Proper use of the Photoshop trademark


Recommended Posts

Hoover is a brand name... yet what do most people call the machines which sucks up dirt from your carpet? a Hoover!

don't see them going batsh** crazy about it. they love it for the free publicity.

Edited by Grunt

I'd bet Adobe is doing this because they want to disassociate the product "photoshop" with any negativity that it get's when it's an image badly edited or has negative connotations. lol especially the images that are used with bad intentions.

they'd rather be associated with the best photo editors than the crappy or evil ones... lol basically.

Google also state they discourage the use of the term 'Googled'. This is standard practice - genericising a process with a brand name in it (i.e. photoshopping for 'image enhancement' etc.) dilutes the brand.

That said, when choosing the name for their new search product, Microsoft spoke of the importance of ensuring Bing is easily turned into a verb. It works both ways - having your trademark used as part of a generic process can bring publicity but it can also associate it with poor practices.

Hoover is a brand name... yet what do most people call the machines which sucks up dirt from your carpet? a Hoover!

don't see them going batsh** crazy about it. they love it for the free publicity.

I'd call it a vacuum... Hoovering is what the girlfriend is good at.

Lol @ Brian.

I dunno about Microsofts plan to turn "Bing" into a verb. to 'Google' something rolls off the tongue. to 'Bing' something feels kinda awkward.

Maybe it will catch on.

but its always going to be 'photoshopped' for image enhancement/modification. No-one is ever going to say "Thats paint.NETed" or "Paint Shop Pro'd" lol

#Edit

"thats so gimped" works :p

that's not meant for the general public. It are guidelines for companies using the Photoshop (excuse me: Adobe Photoshop Software) brand in their advertising or whatever.

Like for example, a company makes a plugin for photoshop and sell it. On their site they should say: this is a plugin for the Adobe Photoshop Software packet ...

Adobe couldn't give a toss about the general public making a verb of their brand, on the contrary, free publicity. However, other companies and advertising companies have to use it like it should be used as a brand. Otherwise you dillute your brand name.

Lol @ Brian.

I dunno about Microsofts plan to turn "Bing" into a verb. to 'Google' something rolls off the tongue. to 'Bing' something feels kinda awkward.

Maybe it will catch on.

but its always going to be 'photoshopped' for image enhancement/modification. No-one is ever going to say "Thats paint.NETed" or "Paint Shop Pro'd" lol

#Edit

"thats so gimped" works :p

*sigh* Once again, another one of the girlfriend things... You google a search term; you bing... Well. Yeah.

I remember reading about that a while ago. People went nuts at Adobe for being so anal about their brand.

I made this:

[yes it's photoshopped]

Did your image get the same response then as it got this time? A deadly silence.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Huh? I have an Aeron Remastered and the backrest cannot go up or down (only the lumbar is adjustable). Yes, the Doro C300 Pro V2's backrest can be locked, but the locking mechanism is so weak that when you recline and lean back the backrest moves with your body. I think the whole purpose of this chair is that all of the moving parts (except for the rocking, which can be locked in place) are supposed to move with your body, as you shift your weight, that's why I couldn't get used to it. Some people might like it though. Its redeeming factor is the price, I mean it costs like a quarter of what a new Herman MIller (Aeron) costs.
    • Well done Massie. This is how to treat the Fox News filth.   
    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!