Recommended Posts

Its set after Nemesis so they dont have to stick to canon they can make up any old random bullcrap, im having nightmares just imagining Startrek WoW with its gaudy colours.

Yeah customising your own ship just like every starship captain in every trek film/series..........oh wait.

I hate them messing with iconic ship designs and putting sticky-out bits all over it and calling it a ship.

I guess you're afraid of change then. What do you expect them to do? Keep the same ship designs even though it's set so many years after the events of Star Trek: Nemesis?. I'm a die-hard Trekkie and I welcome Star Trek: Online with open arms. It's about time someone made a decent Star Trek game. And in case you didn't know, it's an MMO-game. It's bound to have some similarities to World of Warcraft. That doesn't make it a bad game. Plus, the wonderful people over at Cryptic Studios are working closely with CBS to ensure that whatever they come up with stays true to Star Trek. I bet you didn't know that.

Anyway, closed beta sign-ups are now open! Head over to www.startrekonline.com and sign up for a chance to beta test Star Trek Online. I already submitted my application. Best of luck to everyone. :D

Cant believe any true trekkie could be excited about this game, they are going to make it for the masses rather than for the trekkies, it just happens to be an mmo that is startrek.

Oh believe me .. this is MUCH more for the trekkies and trekkers.

I've been talking with the Devs. :)

I've been following this for a long time, before cryptic took over actually when the original STO was ditched. These guys have a lot better ideas, the character customisation is better, then you can choose federation or klingon and ground missions etc. I can't wait for this tbh and this and SW: Old Republic might be the only games in the next year or so that bring me back to PC gaming as I've gone totally to console now...

fingers crossed :)

I've been following this for a long time, before cryptic took over actually when the original STO was ditched. These guys have a lot better ideas, the character customisation is better, then you can choose federation or klingon and ground missions etc. I can't wait for this tbh and this and SW: Old Republic might be the only games in the next year or so that bring me back to PC gaming as I've gone totally to console now...

fingers crossed :)

Fingers crossed indeed. I really hope this game is good because if it is, it will save Star Trek gaming.

screens i saw in the pc gamer magazine weren't very good, the uniforms look like tos uniforms with bits stuck on shoulders etc, there was even a image of an awful looking alien women, I don't know what kind of rubbish artists they employ....

There was even a picture of a sovereign class ship with bits stuck on the sides. So bad.

Here are two more Star Trek Online impressions, this time from PAX. First one is from Joystiq, and the second is from their sister site Massively. I'm going to message a mod to have the thread title changed to the official Star Trek Online deal since gamescom is way over, and we've included stuff from PAX and soon I'm sure TGS etc. Anyways, here are the links, enjoy:

Joystiq PAX STO Hands On

Massively PAX STO Phasers Locked

I forgot I can still edit the thread title lol so I did it, edited. :)

Ships between TMP era and TNG era which is what Nemesis was essentially in which was well over a 50 year difference the ships didnt look all that different. Ship design, bridge layout, LCARS, everything was similar, this looks like a ship a child would draw with bits stuck to it, this game is made purely for the WoW crowd so it looks all pretty and futuristic.

They are going to destroy Trek canon with this crap.

Jesus Christ, people!!

Look, two things:

1. It's an MMO.

2. You can build your own ship.

As an MMO, you must appeal to as wide an audience as you can to make money. Therefore, more customability the better.

And really, if it bothers you that much to fly an "ugly" or non-"cannon" ship... then BUILD YOURSELF A COPY OF THE ENTERPRISE!!

Ships have changed over the course of the series. Next Generation introduced the splitting of the saucer section. Some liked it,

some didn't. But the point is... if you don't like an updated ship then don't fly one. It's your game, play it YOUR way... but don't

tell me I'm not allowed to like it.

Sorry, I'm just sick of folks trying to dictate what -I- should enjoy. If you'd spend half your time worrying about how YOU

play the game instead of whining about how others are playing... you'd enjoy the experience a hell of a lot more.

The quote was taken, and retort given, in generalization- not to any specific person.

I'm really looking forward to it, I've never really done any proper "MMO's"

I do love Star Trek games, I play Star Trek Armada 2 all the time because I just love the universe and the ships. Elite force 2 was pretty good too, never completed 1 as I gave up on the crap loading times on the PS2.

I also never completed the last chapter of Bridge Commander as the Hybrid Ships at the end obliterate my Soveriegn.

But anyway, hopefully this will be good.

And as to it being Star Trek Cannon, Its like the Force Unleashed is to Star Wars, I think George Lucas said it was Cannon, but obviously the apprentice didn't jump off a cliff and re-spawned 20 times before getting it right, but the story behind it is what the cannon is linked to.

  • 3 weeks later...

OK, here is the (current) STO ships list that they put out today. These class ships will be in the game as playable/etc:

Federation Player Ships

Light Cruisers

* Miranda

* Centaur

* Soyuz

Lieutenant Commander

Science (Science Vessel)

* Nova

* Aurora

* Quasar

Escort (Escort)

* Saber

* Rapier

* Ushaan

Cruiser (Cruiser)

* Constitution

* Excalibur

* Vesper

Commander

Science

(Research Science Vessel)

* Olympic

* Hope

* Horizon

Escort (Heavy Escort)

* Akira

* Zephyr

* Norway (Oslo re-fit)

Cruiser (Heavy Cruiser)

* Constellation

* Stargazer

* Dakota

Captain

Science

(Long Range Science Vessel)

* Intrepid

* Cochrane

* Discovery

Escort (Tactical Escort)

* Defiant

* Vigilant

* Gallant

Cruiser (Exploration Cruiser)

* Galaxy

* Celestial

* Envoy

Admiral

Science

(Deep Space Science Vessel)

* Luna

* Sol

* Polaris

Escort (Fleet Escort)

* Prometheus

* Phoenix

* Cerberus

Cruiser (Battle Cruiser)

* Sovereign

* Noble

* Majestic

Klingon Ships

* Raptor

* Vo'Quv

Other Ships

* Type VII Commercial Laboratory

* CLASSIFIED

* NX-91001

I'm not sure this is gonna paste in properly, so here is the actual page that shows the classes: STO Ship Classes

Enjoy :)

  • 1 month later...

Since the announcement of the release date, I'm looking into getting this. But really need to get on the beta to really make up my mind.

Anyone know what happens when you lose your ship? Is it like Eve where you have to build up from scratch, or like wow you re-spawn and have to repair?

Space combat has me sold it reminds me of Starfleet Command 3 and Bridge Commander online multiplayer mixed into one with shield vectors and being able to transfer power around systems, im very apprehentious about the away team missions/combat though.

Shame my favourite ship the intrepid needs one of the highest ranks to be able to command, even though the Intrepid isnt a science vessel its a scout.

Star Trek Online may launch on Stardate 63554.5 (February 2, 2010), but beginning January 12, fans can beam into the open beta. The intergalactic guinea pig session will take place between January 12 to 26. Players interested in kicking the warp nacelles should head on over to startrekonline.com to enroll.

Punch it! Make it So! etc..! Woohoo!

Since the announcement of the release date, I'm looking into getting this. But really need to get on the beta to really make up my mind.

Anyone know what happens when you lose your ship? Is it like Eve where you have to build up from scratch, or like wow you re-spawn and have to repair?

I'm pretty sure you just get the ship back, but don't quote me on that. lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!