Recommended Posts

I am trying to connect an HDMI cable from my computer to my TV. The cable I currently have is about 3-4 feet too short. I have a friend who might let me have his five foot HDMI cable so I started thinking. If I used an adapter to put the two different cables together, that would prevent me from having to buy another cable.

I know each time a digital signal goes through something it loses quality, but if it is just going through an HDMI to HDMI adapter will it really degrade that much?

You're thinking of an analog signal. Digital signals don't lose quality, you either get a reliable signal or you don't. A HDMI cable is like a USB cable, if you add an extension you don't start losing pieces of your files.

I am trying to connect an HDMI cable from my computer to my TV. The cable I currently have is about 3-4 feet too short. I have a friend who might let me have his five foot HDMI cable so I started thinking. If I used an adapter to put the two different cables together, that would prevent me from having to buy another cable.

I know each time a digital signal goes through something it loses quality, but if it is just going through an HDMI to HDMI adapter will it really degrade that much?

How long will the cable be in total. with hdmi as the signal is digital, the signal degrades yes, but that doesn't necessarily translate to the data degrading. Proper hdmi cables should output the same signal the other end as they get in. The signal degradation you get with digital cables merely means you'll get a shorter range on the cables before the data signals get de-synced or lose to much definition to be properly decoded, and you'll get noticeable artifaction or total signal loss.

So if the adapter and cables is of good quality, you should be ok. if the total length of the cable is quite long though, you might consider getting a new single cable instead. or at least make sure the cables you have are of good quality.

Well, if the price of a longer cable is an issue, I'd get the adapter and just try. There is a difference though. Two shorter cables together is not necessarily the same as one long cable, because the short ones only have to be designed to keep noise to an acceptable level over that specific distance.

You're thinking of an analog signal. Digital signals don't lose quality, you either get a reliable signal or you don't. A HDMI cable is like a USB cable, if you add an extension you don't start losing pieces of your files.

No, HDMI is not like USB at all. HDMI transmits the elements of the video signals separately (i.e red, green and blue over separate wires in RGB mode) pixel by pixel with no error correction and no ability to retransmit in case of errors. USB or Ethernet on the other hand, have both of these so that they can pretty much still work over a piece of string. In other words, if there is too much noise on the connection, it can affect individual pixels (and even the individual elements of each pixel).

HDMI cables work up to 50 feet, if i'm not mistaken.

If they're made, tested and certified for it.

since there are multiple cables inside a HDMI cable, the sygnals in them can desync depending on cable quality and abuse of the cable.

Also he's talking about using an adapter, to connect to hdmi cables, any connectors add significant signal loss(in strength) compared to a plain copper cable.

Generally as long as he gets a picture it's ok. but if he gets bad blocking/artifacting (or any) or complete signal loss, then obviously things have gotten bad in the cable. the good thing is that digital signals usually works just fine until they break down completely, with a small gap of "blocking" in between.

The thign is that in a cable, a ditital, one and zero signal like this, _█_ doesn't come out like that, while it travels inthe cbale, it gets stretched out, the edges get rounded, eventually it looks like a sinus curve, no problem, it still works then. too long, the the peak get's to low and the lows get to high to the receiver to recognize the start and end of 1 and 0's. but before this happens, the difference in the individual signal cables inthe hdmi cables case the signals in them to degrade differently, and thus desync, resulting in data that can't be decoded.

I actually need something at least 18 feet. I'll start looking up adapters on Monoprice. I would be be looking for female to female correct?

Edit: This discussion has just been made mute. I have a friend who has a laptop HDMI connector and I will just use my existing cable and his laptop. Sorry for the trouble.

I actually need something at least 18 feet. I'll start looking up adapters on Monoprice. I would be be looking for female to female correct?

Edit: This discussion has just been made mute. I have a friend who has a laptop HDMI connector and I will just use my existing cable and his laptop. Sorry for the trouble.

Female to female coupler:

http://www.monoprice.com/products/product....=1&format=2

You're thinking of an analog signal. Digital signals don't lose quality, you either get a reliable signal or you don't. A HDMI cable is like a USB cable, if you add an extension you don't start losing pieces of your files.

The signal itself, digital or not, will most likely suffer from the connector thing. But the signal is 100% "error free" (because of the digital modulation technique, error correction, etc) up to a certain level. And I doubt he will reach that level.

  • 2 years later...

Having issues when using hdmi connectors - signal does not work and trying to understand why

For 1 example 

Have 2 3m hdmi cables , i use each one seperately (ie connect lap top and it works fine)

Now if I want to put a female-female connector in between it does not work get no signal at TV

Do I need some type of hdmi crossover cable, can figure it out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!