More Supposed Google Chrome OS Screenshots


Recommended Posts

shot1u.jpg

shot2thumb.png

Source

These new screenshots are very similar to the ones that were leaked a few weeks back. Even though Google is still not commenting on them just yet, they certainly look legit considering the whole goal of the Chrome OS is to be a simplistic "webtop" of sorts.

Edit: resized first image :)

Edited by BetaAddict

If this is the real Chrome OS - not some fake - it's starting to look extremely nice :) I love the fact there is no frame around the browser, so tabs stick out at the top. The 'dock'-type element at the side is also attractive to me, seeing as I love large icons and Google do design some pretty sexy icons ;)

There is a VERY easy way to tell whether or not the screenshots are from the REAL Chrome OS. None of these released so far are. They are all just amateur hour mock-ups/fakes.

And no, I can't tell you why or how I know this. :D

That is why I made to sure to add "supposed" in the thread title. I can't seem to find the other screenshots from a few weeks back, but it had the dockbar on the top. The rest of it was mostly the same.

Even if these screenshots are fake (I don't know enough about the art of Photoshop to insert a meaningful opinion on the matter), I imagine that the Chrome OS would look fairly similar to this, since the entire idea is to make an OS that is minimal, with the web browser as the primary point of emphasis. Maybe it'll end up being an amalgamation of the three sets of rumored screens:

Set 1

Set 2

Set 3

Am I the only one that notices that among all the rumored images so far, they all seem to be wasting a lot of screen real estate. Out of every alleged screenshot, there seems to be a huge (100-200 pixel minimum) space on every side of the browser, with no maximize button or resizing handle.

Honestly, if the real Chrome OS comes out looking like those, and there is indeed no maximize button/resize handles, than I sure wouldn't use it. That's why I quit using my Mac on a day-to-day basis - most default Mac OS apps (safari, address book, itunes, and especially finder) won't maximize.

Probably a mockup but the tilted mail icon bugs me. I'd rather have it be straight and aligned. Icons look a bit too cartoony and unprofessional looking for my taste.

Honestly, if the real Chrome OS comes out looking like those, and there is indeed no maximize button/resize handles, than I sure wouldn't use it. That's why I quit using my Mac on a day-to-day basis - most default Mac OS apps (safari, address book, itunes, and especially finder) won't maximize.

I hate that Safari doesn't maximize all the way but instead, only makes the browser as big as the web page.

Yeah, the Chrome logo (presumably used to launch the browser) is a huge waste of space. Back when I had my 13.3 inch MacBook, I hid the dock for that very reason. I don't like having a huge space hog taking up horizontal space on a widescreen display. If they moved the Chrome logo to the "dock" (for lack of another term) with the rest of the icons, and if they made the "dock" sizable and free to move or hide, I could see that design working.

There is a VERY easy way to tell whether or not the screenshots are from the REAL Chrome OS. None of these released so far are. They are all just amateur hour mock-ups/fakes.

And no, I can't tell you why or how I know this. :D

There is always the easy tell- tale signs in most fakes proving what they really are 'shopped from. Nothing special anyone else cant figure out.

Totally photoshopped, google knows interfaces pretty well to leave all that space to waste.

Have you every visited the google homepage or searched on their site? There is plenty of white, empty space all around. Even gmail was ridiculously plain for many years before they finally released the labs features and made their API available to others.

why are you guys saying this is photoshoped?

this could be EASILY done by a 10 year old, and without photoshop.

step one, install chrome.

step two, download or make your own wallpaper.

step three, modify the wallpaper so it has a build number and a clock on it.

step four, install objectdock and put google product icons into it.

step five, hide taskbar and desktop icons.

step six, take picture with camera and post online.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 26H2 absolutely will support ARM Windows just not on devices that came with 26H1. This is evident by the fact I am running 26H2, which on my MacBook Neo and Surface Book, within a VM.
    • Mp3tag 3.35 by Razvan Serea Mp3tag is a powerful and yet easy-to-use tool to edit metadata (ID3, Vorbis Comments and APE) of common audio formats. It can rename files based on the tag information, replace characters or words from tags and filenames, import/export tag information, create playlists and more. The program supports online freedb database lookups for selected files, allowing you to automatically gather proper tag information for select files or CDs. Mp3tag supports the following audio formats: Advanced Audio Coding (aac) Free Lossless Audio Codec (flac) Monkeys Audio (ape) Mpeg Layer 3 (mp3) MPEG-4 (mp4 / m4a / m4b / iTunes compatible) Musepack (mpc) Ogg Vorbis (ogg) OptimFROG (ofr) OptimFROG DualStream (ofs) Speex (spx) Toms Audio Kompressor (tak) True Audio (tta) Windows Media Audio (wma) WavPack (wv) Mp3tag 3.35 changelog: This version introduces a new Files options page, enhanced toolbar customization, support for RF64 WAV files, improved Discogs and MusicBrainz tag sources, and many other improvements and fixes. See the Release Notes for more details. Download: Mp3tag 64-bit | 5.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Mp3tag 32-bit | 5.2 MB Link: Mp3tag Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The FIFA World Cup is not US centric.
    • It’s amusing how Microsoft is pushing IT admins as if this was a major, game-changing update. In reality, it’s just an enablement package that bumps the build number, which is disappointing compared to the more substantial 22H2 and 24H2 releases. Technically, 25H2, 26H1, and the upcoming 26H2 are essentially the same, differing only in support schedules. They could have included the Windows K2 improvements here, but chose not to. The era of Windows being in the backburner continues, and this 26H2 release feels like an afterthought. Shame, Nadella, shame.
    • Microsoft, totally not confusing /s 25H2 - Current for non-Arm based Windows 26H1 - Current for Arm based Windows 26H2 - Only for non Arm Windows
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!