More Supposed Google Chrome OS Screenshots


Recommended Posts

shot1u.jpg

shot2thumb.png

Source

These new screenshots are very similar to the ones that were leaked a few weeks back. Even though Google is still not commenting on them just yet, they certainly look legit considering the whole goal of the Chrome OS is to be a simplistic "webtop" of sorts.

Edit: resized first image :)

Edited by BetaAddict

If this is the real Chrome OS - not some fake - it's starting to look extremely nice :) I love the fact there is no frame around the browser, so tabs stick out at the top. The 'dock'-type element at the side is also attractive to me, seeing as I love large icons and Google do design some pretty sexy icons ;)

There is a VERY easy way to tell whether or not the screenshots are from the REAL Chrome OS. None of these released so far are. They are all just amateur hour mock-ups/fakes.

And no, I can't tell you why or how I know this. :D

That is why I made to sure to add "supposed" in the thread title. I can't seem to find the other screenshots from a few weeks back, but it had the dockbar on the top. The rest of it was mostly the same.

Even if these screenshots are fake (I don't know enough about the art of Photoshop to insert a meaningful opinion on the matter), I imagine that the Chrome OS would look fairly similar to this, since the entire idea is to make an OS that is minimal, with the web browser as the primary point of emphasis. Maybe it'll end up being an amalgamation of the three sets of rumored screens:

Set 1

Set 2

Set 3

Am I the only one that notices that among all the rumored images so far, they all seem to be wasting a lot of screen real estate. Out of every alleged screenshot, there seems to be a huge (100-200 pixel minimum) space on every side of the browser, with no maximize button or resizing handle.

Honestly, if the real Chrome OS comes out looking like those, and there is indeed no maximize button/resize handles, than I sure wouldn't use it. That's why I quit using my Mac on a day-to-day basis - most default Mac OS apps (safari, address book, itunes, and especially finder) won't maximize.

Probably a mockup but the tilted mail icon bugs me. I'd rather have it be straight and aligned. Icons look a bit too cartoony and unprofessional looking for my taste.

Honestly, if the real Chrome OS comes out looking like those, and there is indeed no maximize button/resize handles, than I sure wouldn't use it. That's why I quit using my Mac on a day-to-day basis - most default Mac OS apps (safari, address book, itunes, and especially finder) won't maximize.

I hate that Safari doesn't maximize all the way but instead, only makes the browser as big as the web page.

Yeah, the Chrome logo (presumably used to launch the browser) is a huge waste of space. Back when I had my 13.3 inch MacBook, I hid the dock for that very reason. I don't like having a huge space hog taking up horizontal space on a widescreen display. If they moved the Chrome logo to the "dock" (for lack of another term) with the rest of the icons, and if they made the "dock" sizable and free to move or hide, I could see that design working.

There is a VERY easy way to tell whether or not the screenshots are from the REAL Chrome OS. None of these released so far are. They are all just amateur hour mock-ups/fakes.

And no, I can't tell you why or how I know this. :D

There is always the easy tell- tale signs in most fakes proving what they really are 'shopped from. Nothing special anyone else cant figure out.

Totally photoshopped, google knows interfaces pretty well to leave all that space to waste.

Have you every visited the google homepage or searched on their site? There is plenty of white, empty space all around. Even gmail was ridiculously plain for many years before they finally released the labs features and made their API available to others.

why are you guys saying this is photoshoped?

this could be EASILY done by a 10 year old, and without photoshop.

step one, install chrome.

step two, download or make your own wallpaper.

step three, modify the wallpaper so it has a build number and a clock on it.

step four, install objectdock and put google product icons into it.

step five, hide taskbar and desktop icons.

step six, take picture with camera and post online.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!