More Supposed Google Chrome OS Screenshots


Recommended Posts

shot1u.jpg

shot2thumb.png

Source

These new screenshots are very similar to the ones that were leaked a few weeks back. Even though Google is still not commenting on them just yet, they certainly look legit considering the whole goal of the Chrome OS is to be a simplistic "webtop" of sorts.

Edit: resized first image :)

Edited by BetaAddict

If this is the real Chrome OS - not some fake - it's starting to look extremely nice :) I love the fact there is no frame around the browser, so tabs stick out at the top. The 'dock'-type element at the side is also attractive to me, seeing as I love large icons and Google do design some pretty sexy icons ;)

There is a VERY easy way to tell whether or not the screenshots are from the REAL Chrome OS. None of these released so far are. They are all just amateur hour mock-ups/fakes.

And no, I can't tell you why or how I know this. :D

That is why I made to sure to add "supposed" in the thread title. I can't seem to find the other screenshots from a few weeks back, but it had the dockbar on the top. The rest of it was mostly the same.

Even if these screenshots are fake (I don't know enough about the art of Photoshop to insert a meaningful opinion on the matter), I imagine that the Chrome OS would look fairly similar to this, since the entire idea is to make an OS that is minimal, with the web browser as the primary point of emphasis. Maybe it'll end up being an amalgamation of the three sets of rumored screens:

Set 1

Set 2

Set 3

Am I the only one that notices that among all the rumored images so far, they all seem to be wasting a lot of screen real estate. Out of every alleged screenshot, there seems to be a huge (100-200 pixel minimum) space on every side of the browser, with no maximize button or resizing handle.

Honestly, if the real Chrome OS comes out looking like those, and there is indeed no maximize button/resize handles, than I sure wouldn't use it. That's why I quit using my Mac on a day-to-day basis - most default Mac OS apps (safari, address book, itunes, and especially finder) won't maximize.

Probably a mockup but the tilted mail icon bugs me. I'd rather have it be straight and aligned. Icons look a bit too cartoony and unprofessional looking for my taste.

Honestly, if the real Chrome OS comes out looking like those, and there is indeed no maximize button/resize handles, than I sure wouldn't use it. That's why I quit using my Mac on a day-to-day basis - most default Mac OS apps (safari, address book, itunes, and especially finder) won't maximize.

I hate that Safari doesn't maximize all the way but instead, only makes the browser as big as the web page.

Yeah, the Chrome logo (presumably used to launch the browser) is a huge waste of space. Back when I had my 13.3 inch MacBook, I hid the dock for that very reason. I don't like having a huge space hog taking up horizontal space on a widescreen display. If they moved the Chrome logo to the "dock" (for lack of another term) with the rest of the icons, and if they made the "dock" sizable and free to move or hide, I could see that design working.

There is a VERY easy way to tell whether or not the screenshots are from the REAL Chrome OS. None of these released so far are. They are all just amateur hour mock-ups/fakes.

And no, I can't tell you why or how I know this. :D

There is always the easy tell- tale signs in most fakes proving what they really are 'shopped from. Nothing special anyone else cant figure out.

Totally photoshopped, google knows interfaces pretty well to leave all that space to waste.

Have you every visited the google homepage or searched on their site? There is plenty of white, empty space all around. Even gmail was ridiculously plain for many years before they finally released the labs features and made their API available to others.

why are you guys saying this is photoshoped?

this could be EASILY done by a 10 year old, and without photoshop.

step one, install chrome.

step two, download or make your own wallpaper.

step three, modify the wallpaper so it has a build number and a clock on it.

step four, install objectdock and put google product icons into it.

step five, hide taskbar and desktop icons.

step six, take picture with camera and post online.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!