More Supposed Google Chrome OS Screenshots


Recommended Posts

shot1u.jpg

shot2thumb.png

Source

These new screenshots are very similar to the ones that were leaked a few weeks back. Even though Google is still not commenting on them just yet, they certainly look legit considering the whole goal of the Chrome OS is to be a simplistic "webtop" of sorts.

Edit: resized first image :)

Edited by BetaAddict

If this is the real Chrome OS - not some fake - it's starting to look extremely nice :) I love the fact there is no frame around the browser, so tabs stick out at the top. The 'dock'-type element at the side is also attractive to me, seeing as I love large icons and Google do design some pretty sexy icons ;)

There is a VERY easy way to tell whether or not the screenshots are from the REAL Chrome OS. None of these released so far are. They are all just amateur hour mock-ups/fakes.

And no, I can't tell you why or how I know this. :D

That is why I made to sure to add "supposed" in the thread title. I can't seem to find the other screenshots from a few weeks back, but it had the dockbar on the top. The rest of it was mostly the same.

Even if these screenshots are fake (I don't know enough about the art of Photoshop to insert a meaningful opinion on the matter), I imagine that the Chrome OS would look fairly similar to this, since the entire idea is to make an OS that is minimal, with the web browser as the primary point of emphasis. Maybe it'll end up being an amalgamation of the three sets of rumored screens:

Set 1

Set 2

Set 3

Am I the only one that notices that among all the rumored images so far, they all seem to be wasting a lot of screen real estate. Out of every alleged screenshot, there seems to be a huge (100-200 pixel minimum) space on every side of the browser, with no maximize button or resizing handle.

Honestly, if the real Chrome OS comes out looking like those, and there is indeed no maximize button/resize handles, than I sure wouldn't use it. That's why I quit using my Mac on a day-to-day basis - most default Mac OS apps (safari, address book, itunes, and especially finder) won't maximize.

Probably a mockup but the tilted mail icon bugs me. I'd rather have it be straight and aligned. Icons look a bit too cartoony and unprofessional looking for my taste.

Honestly, if the real Chrome OS comes out looking like those, and there is indeed no maximize button/resize handles, than I sure wouldn't use it. That's why I quit using my Mac on a day-to-day basis - most default Mac OS apps (safari, address book, itunes, and especially finder) won't maximize.

I hate that Safari doesn't maximize all the way but instead, only makes the browser as big as the web page.

Yeah, the Chrome logo (presumably used to launch the browser) is a huge waste of space. Back when I had my 13.3 inch MacBook, I hid the dock for that very reason. I don't like having a huge space hog taking up horizontal space on a widescreen display. If they moved the Chrome logo to the "dock" (for lack of another term) with the rest of the icons, and if they made the "dock" sizable and free to move or hide, I could see that design working.

There is a VERY easy way to tell whether or not the screenshots are from the REAL Chrome OS. None of these released so far are. They are all just amateur hour mock-ups/fakes.

And no, I can't tell you why or how I know this. :D

There is always the easy tell- tale signs in most fakes proving what they really are 'shopped from. Nothing special anyone else cant figure out.

Totally photoshopped, google knows interfaces pretty well to leave all that space to waste.

Have you every visited the google homepage or searched on their site? There is plenty of white, empty space all around. Even gmail was ridiculously plain for many years before they finally released the labs features and made their API available to others.

why are you guys saying this is photoshoped?

this could be EASILY done by a 10 year old, and without photoshop.

step one, install chrome.

step two, download or make your own wallpaper.

step three, modify the wallpaper so it has a build number and a clock on it.

step four, install objectdock and put google product icons into it.

step five, hide taskbar and desktop icons.

step six, take picture with camera and post online.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nothing is stopping you from continuing with your testing cadence. If updates are released every 2 weeks instead of 4, and you test once every 4 weeks, the exact same amount of patches will still be available for you in those 4 weeks. For example: Before 4th week - patch 1, 2, 3, 4 After 2nd week - patch 1 and 2 4th week - patch 3 and 4 Still the same amount after 4.
    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!