• 0

Turbo C for Windows 7


Question

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Is there a reason you want to use Turbo C? I'd highly recommend trying Code::Blocks which also lets you compile C apps as well as C++.

Highlights:

* Open Source! GPLv3, no hidden costs.

* Cross-platform. Runs on Linux, Mac, Windows (uses wxWidgets).

* Written in C++. No interpreted languages or proprietary libs needed.

* Extensible through plugins

Compiler:

* Multiple compiler support:

o GCC (MingW / GNU GCC)

o MSVC++

o Digital Mars

o Borland C++ 5.5

o Open Watcom

o ...and more

* Very fast custom build system (no makefiles needed)

* Support for parallel builds (utilizing your CPU's extra cores)

* Multi-target projects

* Workspaces to combine multiple projects

* Inter-project dependencies inside workspace

* Imports MSVC projects and workspaces (NOTE: assembly code not supported yet)

* Imports Dev-C++ projects

Debugger:

* Interfaces GNU GDB

* Also supports MS CDB (not fully featured)

* Full breakpoints support:

o Code breakpoints

o Data breakpoints (read, write and read/write)

o Breakpoint conditions (break only when an expression is true)

o Breakpoint ignore counts (break only after certain number of hits)

* Display local function symbols and arguments

* User-defined watches (support for watching user-defined types through scripting)

* Call stack

* Disassembly

* Custom memory dump

* Switch between threads

* View CPU registers

Interface:

* Syntax highlighting, customizable and extensible

* Code folding for C++ and XML files.

* Tabbed interface

* Code completion

* Class Browser

* Smart indent

* One-key swap between .h and .c/.cpp files

* Open files list for quick switching between files (optional)

* External customizable "Tools"

* To-do list management with different users

  • 0

Turbo C is an antique software, designed for the DOS-era. There are many incompatibilities with the C standards as well as with today's OSs (such as direct hardware access). Its better to move to more modern compilers, including Visual C/C++ (Express editions are free), GCC or LLVM. Heck, if you must, use Turbo C++ (the one that was re-launched in 2006). The Explorer edition is free.

Turbo C v2: http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/20841

Turbo C++ 2006 Explorer: http://www.turboexplorer.com/cpp

  • 0
have you tried XP mode ?

link

My motherboard does not support Hardware Virtualization

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - - - ---- - -- -- --- --

I know the software is way old but i still have to learn in order to get pass

  • 0
My motherboard does not support Hardware Virtualization

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - - - ---- - -- -- --- --

I know the software is way old but i still have to learn in order to get pass

unfortunately ,you are out of luck then.

sry

  • 0

Well, you aren't going to find it "for Windows 7." It was a commercial DOS product back in 1990. The 32-bit versions of Windows do have a DOS emulator, but I'm not sure if it will run TC. Another option is a virtual machine like QEMU which you've posted a screenshot of (or VirtualBox or VirtualPC). You'd then have to install a DOS variant (like FreeDOS) in this, and then Turbo C in that.

As for getting Turbo C itself, the only legal way appears to be this: http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/21751

Anything else would be piracy and illegal, and against the Neowin rules.

  • 0

Antique Software: Turbo C++ version 1.01,

This museum version of Turbo C++ is available free of charge to registered users of C++Builder 2007 or later,

RAD Studio 2007 or later or Embarcadero All-Access.

Antique Software: Turbo C version 2.01,

These historical files are provided to the Borland community free of charge.

They may be downloaded and used "as is" for personal use only.

.edit, nvm.

  • 0

So I assume this is for a class (since you're talking about passing), but what kind of class requires the use of 20 year old software? (especially if it's incompatible with what's in use today, you'll be taught things that are wrong/outdated/etc.)

  • 0

It should work I would think under DOSBox as well.. a while back, purely for laughs, I managed to get Turbo Pascal 5.5 going under it with little difficulty. Not even sure why I bothered, but... if that fails, of course fire up a virtual machine and just install MSDOS. To be honest, it's more trouble than it's worth though. Back in the day it was great, but it's absolutely painful to use nowadays, let alone useless as you won't be able to run anything you compile except under the emulator. Plenty of freebies out there that are up to date. Visual C++ Express for example. (Or a full blown 2010 Pro if you qualify for DreamSpark, among other freebies that MS provides.)

http://www.microsoft.com/express/Windows/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!