Do you need third-party performance software on windows 7?


Recommended Posts

I have PerfectDisk loaded and Norton AV 2009 loaded. I basically did so because I paid for them and didn't want to let that money go to waste.

Once my NAV subscription is up I'll take a look at the free Microsoft Security Essentials app as a replacement. PerfectDisk... I'll use it until a SP breaks it and then I'll go back to the built in tool probably.

  • 4 weeks later...

3rd party performance stuff is not really needed in windows 7 but perfectdisk is a good option, another good way depending on your system is to turn off some windows features like media center and windows movie maker if you don't use them and the XPS stuff if your not gonna use it but results will vary.

O&O Defrag 12 (win 7 compatible) is out next week,along with perfectdisk is the two best defragmentation tools.

O & O is good stuff

But if youre looking for performance boost - I suggest you look somewhere other than a defrag

and if you are looking to Win7 by wondering what software you need to run to make it faster....get a new computer

yeah it's true, win 7's and vista's defrag is better than what it used to be with xp.

you really don't need another one, it's personal preference.

Just wondering, how do you guys know it's not needed? Yes, Vista and 7 has defrag included, but is it as good as or better than or not as good as third party defraggers. Any hard data on that or is it just opinion?

Upcoming TuneUp Utilties app + Microsoft Security Essentials + Bluetack Blocklist Manager = only security/performance software I need.

Totally agree.. don't know about Bluetack blocklist manager..but new TuneUp 2010 with full Win 7 support and Microsoft Security Essentials is the end of headaches with protecting and running Windows smoothly.

Tune Up Utilities have been the best optimization and tuning software I've used through several versions. I'm super glad to support these guys as they make one amazing piece of software. They don't really introduce unnecessary features that often but they constantly improve and their 1-Click Maintenance and optimizations are second to none.

Windows does well on its own. No need for extra crap.

No, it doesn't. I don't understand why after Vista/7, people assume that Windows is almighty and has perfect performance.

I think you do need third-party software to increase performance to the max. PerfectDisk is a must. Registry cleaners and defraggers are useful too (e.g. CCleaner and jv16). I do notice decreased boot time and better performance after using them.

No, it doesn't. I don't understand why after Vista/7, people assume that Windows is almighty and has perfect performance.

I think you do need third-party software to increase performance to the max. PerfectDisk is a must. Registry cleaners and defraggers are useful too (e.g. CCleaner and jv16). I do notice decreased boot time and better performance after using them.

You can't make blanket statements either way. everyone has individual needs. No need to be so aggressive.

IMHO best bet is to Google whatever 3rd party stuff you're looking at. Generally speaking Microsoft looks to provide features/services for everyone in every circumstance with a minimum of potential problems, & often enough it settles for *Good Enough*. 3rd party developers need to do better than that to have *any* hope of survival, so they might well have something you like better, & almost always the more reliable 3rd party apps are at least as good.

Personally in 7 64 for partitioning like Easeus & Paragon -- for backup Acronis or Paragon -- for defrag MyDefrag [used to be Jkdefrag] [uses Windows api] -- occasionally CCleaner.

There are loads of tweaking apps, but generally tend to stay away from those myself, doing a few from tip sites manually -- again Google on whatever you're looking at 1st. IMHO when it comes to 7 & your hardware, it is what it is... you're not turning a P4 into the fastest quad by changing the OS or fiddling with the registry. What you are doing is changing settings that are equally good in the office & for gaming, & making them more suitable for how you run your PC/laptop.

Edited by mikiem

I havent really used any third party tools this time and 7 is working great so far(notice the so far lol)..

I do use the Windows built in defragger and works wonders now.. Microsoft Security Essentials.. CCleaner.. & Revo Uninstaller

I don't use any performance enhancing tools really with Windows 7, except of course a defrag tool. I think that the very best defrag performance tool for NTFS partitions is UltimateDefrag. I don't ever hear anyone mention it, I suppose it isn't very popular. It is under 2MB and is truly the best defrag software for any drive. I do agree that some defrag software is OK for some types of users. I am not downing the included defrag utility included in Windows 7. I just think that this ability is really great.

I will say that there is no way to schedule it, it doesn't come with a massive array of features but what it's true power is, is the ability to place where you want your data at. This probably doesn't mean **** for SSD drives but this is down right badass for rotational drives.

Think about the physics. The inner tracks are naturally faster than the outer tracks. Being able to place certain data (pagefile, windows drivers, prefetch, etc) where you want and separate archive data from data that you need quick access to is really nice. You have to be really careful because you can waste hours defragging your drive only to find out in the end that you configured it wrongly.

There is a learning curve associated with this software but overall it works well. Does anyone know if they are releasing new versions?

Defrag tool - UltimateDefrag 2008

No, it doesn't. I don't understand why after Vista/7, people assume that Windows is almighty and has perfect performance.

I think you do need third-party software to increase performance to the max. PerfectDisk is a must. Registry cleaners and defraggers are useful too (e.g. CCleaner and jv16). I do notice decreased boot time and better performance after using them.

Hey if you get a good placebo effect from running all that crap on top of Windows go for it. But your first statement is an out and out lie. There is no performance to be gained from installing that ****. I tested my system with a stop watch before and after optimization and you guessed it my boot time went up not down after using that crap so placebo away!

Although it does not compare the latest offerings, here's the results of an experiment ran by MaximumPC last year using Vista

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/the_disk_defrag_difference

Surprising enough, the defraggers do a worse job..

+1

Also if you use 3rd party defraggers your superfetch index gets erased IIRC.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!