October 2009 Desktops


Recommended Posts

Really distracting wallpaper, could never use that.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Isn't this a 1920 screen? ^^ whats with the rules or lack thereof around here ?

Important Note: Any image posted that is over 800 x 600 will be removed! Use a thumbnail or use a text link to your image. If your image is removed, this is why.

The thumbnail that links to said image is under the requirement, which is what the rule states.

Guys, please remember the following from the first post of the thread:

Thanks :)

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...amp;p=591644634

It doesn't take a lot of time and effort to read the posting guidelines for this thread (as indicated in the first post).

Whoops sorry. I did that last month and no one said anything. Sorry.

and the rules changed when? Ive been posting 1920's the same way forever.

Gip

It's changed since this month. There was a thread about the "Desktop Thread" rules where people mentioned a few annoyances, including me.

It doesn't matter if someone uses a modem or a fast cable connection. It's always annoying to load a page with several screenshots with a resolution of 1280x1024 and up. The thread stays clean with thumbnails and links to the actual desktop. Now, if people could also stuck to the 7th rule, it would be even a cleaner thread. There are loads of posts with the request for a certain wallpaper. It would be much nicer if people could just post the info for stuff they've used on their desktop. It'll make the thread a nicer place to go to for new resouces.

Also, I don't think that this should be talked about in here since it's kinda off-topic. So this'll be my last post about this matter :p

Hey the theme is fairly customised with stylish tweaks but it's Strata04 Redux with tabs on top tweak! - see customisation section :)

Really distracting wallpaper, could never use that.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Isn't this a 1920 screen? ^^ whats with the rules or lack thereof around here ?

How do you mean, too bright on your screen? on my 120cd/m2 calibrated screen it's very neutral and easy on the eyes, not distracting at all!

It's changed since this month. There was a thread about the "Desktop Thread" rules where people mentioned a few annoyances, including me.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=819052

We've always had these rules, we are just enforcing them more strictly now.

So.. let me get this straight.. now one has to make two screenshots.. one at normal size then one shrunk, then.. how does one go about setting that up to work correctly in the thread so the smaller one appears linking to the larger one... as opposed to just a link, which im sure few people will click.

Lastly.. its a SCREENSHOT thread.. who the heck cares if its 'clean'

So.. let me get this straight.. now one has to make two screenshots.. one at normal size then one shrunk, then.. how does one go about setting that up to work correctly in the thread so the smaller one appears linking to the larger one... as opposed to just a link, which im sure few people will click.

Lastly.. its a SCREENSHOT thread.. who the heck cares if its 'clean'

Do you not know how Forum code works?

It's hardly rocket science.

Logically you're calling a clickable image, the same way a clickable text link works except the text is a thumbnail version of the linked image:

[url=http://rickroll.com][img=an image of rick's grin][/url]

@Winswy: It has to be a pleasant place to browse through without needing to wait every time you click "Next". Lets just drop this now before we're going even more off topic.

And by not going off-topic to much I'll post a screenshot of my desktop:

Windows7_24-10-09_Prev.png

Stuff which I've used:

Visual style: Aero by Microsoft

Wallpaper: Microsoft Surface by SeanFletcher

Edited by Capric0rn
So.. let me get this straight.. now one has to make two screenshots.. one at normal size then one shrunk, then.. how does one go about setting that up to work correctly in the thread so the smaller one appears linking to the larger one... as opposed to just a link, which im sure few people will click.

Firstly, you do not have to create two images. The first post states that it's even better for everyone to link to an external image of your desktop. Seeing as you'd rather not simply link to it, out of choice you will need to make two images - one below 100kb and the actual screenshot. To post it in the thread and link to the actual screenshot, use the following code:

[url="URL OF ACTUAL SCREENSHOT"][img=URL OF IMAGE UNDER 100KB][/url]

I did this today and it took around 5 minutes. It seriously doesn't take long. I also uploaded the actual wallpaper to my image host, so I could link to it and help out others. That is optional, but it is preferred and doesn't take any more time, if you are uploading your other images to a host and have the wallpaper on your hard drive.

Now, let's keep this thread on-topic please. If you have any more queries, questions or comments about this, please send me a personal message.

@Winswy: It has to be a pleasant place to browse through without needing to wait every time you click "Next".

Yeah, uhh I think I'm going to have to go ahead and disagree with you there.. yeah.. umm, I believe its much more pleasant not to have to click every link going down the page when they could just as easily displayed.. maybe I'm weird but its far more clicking of images that you may or may not wish to see.. at full view... ergo, far more time wasted IMO :hmmm: btw.. your still waiting for the images to load if you click a link after the page has loaded... so I hardly see a distinction really.

Actually your thumb \ screen is a great example of that.. its a wall.. and a default taskbar, 8 secs of my life i wont get back :/

Seems more likely that Neowin is getting cheap on bandwidth consumption.... maybe?

Whoever asked me if I know forum code.. no, I haven't a clue... otherwise I wouldn't have asked eh? :rolleyes:

Calum... thank you for providing the code and some direction. I'll know better in the future. 'preciate it. :)

Edited by Winswy
You play Second Life :D I think I'm the only one who found everyone there to be kinda freaky O_o

Hehe, yeah I like getting in there sometimes, I agree there's a lot of freaky people in there lol, same thing when you get in Playstation's Home :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!