• 0

NOD32 vs. MSE


NOD32 vs. MSE  

235 members have voted

  1. 1. In terms of effectiveness and speed, which anti-virus program is better?

    • NOD32
      89
    • Microsoft Security Essentials
      146


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

MSE, by far. NOD32 has been increasingly becoming bloatware with each new version. If you remember, the 2.5, was it, were the pinnacle of performance antivirus, and now, with version 4, it was, in my opinion, hit rock bottom - slows everything so much, it is often unbearable, and I have a pretty fast PC. MSE on the other hand, has better detection rates (no, not false positives :p) and runs heaps faster.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/829888-nod32-vs-mse/#findComment-591710420
Share on other sites

  • 0

nod32 ftw here.

I tried MSE out on my laptop win7 64bit rtm.

The laptop cpu is crappy but MSE had a rave review claiming it to be very light on cpu so gave it a shot. I immediatly started noticing random cpu spikes to 100% on various things and even when the laptop was just sitting there idle. The killer was a app I use all the time took 20+ secs to startup whilst waiting for the virus scan. On nod32 the app starts right away.

In addition I dont like how MSE cannot be tuned, eg. the phone home cannot be turned off, the real time scanning isnt really tunable it has basic on/off and thats it.

Basically I would say MSE is a good free A/V but comparing it to nod32 is bad as nod32 is in a different league.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/829888-nod32-vs-mse/#findComment-591753370
Share on other sites

  • 0
Polls from the past at Neowin always label NOD32 as the winner. Now, Microsoft Security Essentials is out and there is a lot of great things to be said about it.

In terms of effectiveness and speed, which anti-virus program is better?

nod32 is not as good as it used to be. myself im still using avira premium and i love it, best out there IMO.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/829888-nod32-vs-mse/#findComment-591753372
Share on other sites

  • 0

Free vs. Paid. MSE takes the money here. It's absolutely ridiculous that people are paying to protect their PC's when they have free alternatives like Avira and MSE. It would make sense to have Norton and NOD32 when you have corporate machines but it's absolutely unnecessary for personal computing.

Malwarebytee's Anti Malware and MSE replaced Avira a few months back on both my laptops.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/829888-nod32-vs-mse/#findComment-591754974
Share on other sites

  • 0

Malware is a global phenomenon. :yes:

NOD32 is much better than MSE, especially if you are willing to spend $40 on a license for NOD32SS. Otherwise, stick to MSE; it is better than nothing. I use MSE.

EDIT: *gasp*, NOD32 has been defeated in a Neowinian poll? How ironic. We have (I guess: had) a vast group of ESET fanboys.

Edited by Skullpture
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/829888-nod32-vs-mse/#findComment-591755018
Share on other sites

  • 0
Does this forum really need another thread for NOD32 fanboys? Theyre almost as pathetic as Mac fanboys
EDIT: *gasp*, NOD32 has been defeated in a Neowinian poll? How ironic. We have (I guess: had) a vast group of ESET fanboys.

I dont understand what NOD32 has done to anyone to make those types of comments :wacko:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/829888-nod32-vs-mse/#findComment-591755314
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm using both. NOD32 4.x on my main install of Win7 x64, and MSE inside of XP Mode, and honestly I can't tell if there's much difference, so with that said, I'd probably lean towards MSE for the mere fact that it's free (although I did get my subscription of NOD32 for like 12 bucks so I can't complain there either).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/829888-nod32-vs-mse/#findComment-591755354
Share on other sites

  • 0
MSE is really lightweight, runs fast, and is... free.

And the obvious choice here is.... *drumroll*

But if MSE finds one true virus and Norton (for example) finds 1000000000000 true viruses plus that one virus that MSE found....

Who cares if it is lightweight, runs fast, and is... free?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/829888-nod32-vs-mse/#findComment-591755390
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!