Use of L3 cache when compiling?


Recommended Posts

I compile applications often, and they usually take 1-2 hours. I'm planning to upgrade my dual core rig to a quad core one, but I'd like to pull back on cost.

The latest Athlon X4 620 interests me, because I can make use of all 4 cores to compile the app, and it seems to come in cheaply at US$100. Does not having an L3 cache (the Athlon X4s) affect my compile time significantly? i.e. Is it worth paying total 2-3 times more for a Core i5 750 or a Phenom X4 945 instead of Athlon X4 620?

I'm largely budget-conscious but doesn't mind paying more if it's worth it (Core i7s and its associated platform costs are largely out of range though). Also, I tend leave this computer 24/7 so power may be a factor too. I plan to have 8-16 Gb of DDR3 RAM to maximize the potential of the rig during compilation... Nope I don't play games often.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/830194-use-of-l3-cache-when-compiling/
Share on other sites

I just have to ask what exactly are you compiling that takes 1-2 hours? or is it multiple applications that overall take that long?

guess it depends on what you're compiling i know the hard drive can play an important role in compile speed (i tried compiling on a flash memory stick with 10MB read/write surprisingly took a very long time considering the content)

if its processor bound then i guess a core 2 duo/quad would be a nice upgrade path

could you post the rest of your system specs?

cheers

This seems better for an extra $70 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16819103471

L3 cache, 3ghz vs 2.6ghz on the newer, more slightly efficient architecture plus it's a black edition, so you can probably get some extra mhz if you're into overclocking.

I don't overclock, and I'm on a SATA II 1Tb Seagate 7200.11 drive (which I'll swap out for an SSD when prices drop further).

Rest of my specs? Mobo depends on processor (non-gaming), probably 8-16 Gb ram, the hard drive described above, DVD burner, probably onboard graphics.

Oh, and I compile Mozilla applications, e.g. Firefox / Thunderbird. Each take ~1 hour on my dualcore rig. Athlon X2 5600+, 4Gb DDR2 RAM, that Seagate drive above. WinXP. (I compile in about half that time on Ubuntu though I not often on Linux)

I could be wrong, but wouldn't it also be better for you to have a larger L2 cache instead of an L3 cache? As L2 should be closer to the CPU and faster for it to access.

  Quote
L2 and L3 don't make much difference. L2 pools data for cores and L3 pools data feed between L2 basically. latency of them would be minimal when compiling i'm sure.

So having an L3 cache would help? (yes, I would think that higher clockspeed would help, though increasing the number of cores would help more)

What about Core i7? Will having multithreading on top of the 4 cores prove even better?

That link was a bonus for me RAID O I wanted to find out the price of the i5 processors.

I have just read a 4 page review of the i5 series from APC magazine (check there web review) and it suggests that the chipset that's needed can run a new i7 series that has come out, so after say 2yrs you can just replace the cpu and carry on...

However the price for technology is over rated and yes to achieve your goal with the i5 series you need a new m/board P55 chipset and DDR3 ram and an expensive graphics card.

Think about this sum

Intel Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor $200

Intel DP55KG Extreme M/Board $250

low voltage +2200 6gig DDR 3 ram say 300-400

9800 GT or GTX graphics card say 250-300

9800gt or gtx $300? mm what currency is this in?

as for memory no need to get 2200 ^_^

i've had nothing but bad luck with 2000+ memory and in the end if you get 6 dimms its pointless to have that kind of bandwidth as it can't all be utilized (4 dimms in the case of i5..actually anyone know the maximum bandwidth limit supported by the i5?)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Cjam 2.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.0.0.0 fixes: Fixed a bug where the folder list was not updating on the vmp3 screen Download: Cjam 2.0 | 1.3 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Honestly, i either don't care, mind, use, or had any problem with those. 11 is really good for me, has a lot of little refinements, looks great, if i wanted to tweak/fix it's behavior i would with a range of tools, and wouldn't come back to the 2010's looking Win 10 even at gunpoint.
    • You dont want a expensive hp laptop either managed to get 3 new zbooks and they all died on me.
    • Nothing inherently wrong, but why buy 2021 tech in 2025? Assuming you were aiming for 6-10 years of usage, better to buy something current.
    • I have begun using Windows 11 native passkey feature. i have four passkeys set up so far. Three work fine, One has never worked. I have removed it and recreated it several times, still no luck. Anyway, on the websites in which it works, it works geat. No more two 2FA.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Cole Multipass earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Alexander 001 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      icecreamconesleeves earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      PAC0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      PAC0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      567
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      187
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      185
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      113
    5. 5
      Som
      109
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!