Use of L3 cache when compiling?


Recommended Posts

I compile applications often, and they usually take 1-2 hours. I'm planning to upgrade my dual core rig to a quad core one, but I'd like to pull back on cost.

The latest Athlon X4 620 interests me, because I can make use of all 4 cores to compile the app, and it seems to come in cheaply at US$100. Does not having an L3 cache (the Athlon X4s) affect my compile time significantly? i.e. Is it worth paying total 2-3 times more for a Core i5 750 or a Phenom X4 945 instead of Athlon X4 620?

I'm largely budget-conscious but doesn't mind paying more if it's worth it (Core i7s and its associated platform costs are largely out of range though). Also, I tend leave this computer 24/7 so power may be a factor too. I plan to have 8-16 Gb of DDR3 RAM to maximize the potential of the rig during compilation... Nope I don't play games often.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/830194-use-of-l3-cache-when-compiling/
Share on other sites

I just have to ask what exactly are you compiling that takes 1-2 hours? or is it multiple applications that overall take that long?

guess it depends on what you're compiling i know the hard drive can play an important role in compile speed (i tried compiling on a flash memory stick with 10MB read/write surprisingly took a very long time considering the content)

if its processor bound then i guess a core 2 duo/quad would be a nice upgrade path

could you post the rest of your system specs?

cheers

This seems better for an extra $70 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16819103471

L3 cache, 3ghz vs 2.6ghz on the newer, more slightly efficient architecture plus it's a black edition, so you can probably get some extra mhz if you're into overclocking.

I don't overclock, and I'm on a SATA II 1Tb Seagate 7200.11 drive (which I'll swap out for an SSD when prices drop further).

Rest of my specs? Mobo depends on processor (non-gaming), probably 8-16 Gb ram, the hard drive described above, DVD burner, probably onboard graphics.

Oh, and I compile Mozilla applications, e.g. Firefox / Thunderbird. Each take ~1 hour on my dualcore rig. Athlon X2 5600+, 4Gb DDR2 RAM, that Seagate drive above. WinXP. (I compile in about half that time on Ubuntu though I not often on Linux)

I could be wrong, but wouldn't it also be better for you to have a larger L2 cache instead of an L3 cache? As L2 should be closer to the CPU and faster for it to access.

  Quote
L2 and L3 don't make much difference. L2 pools data for cores and L3 pools data feed between L2 basically. latency of them would be minimal when compiling i'm sure.

So having an L3 cache would help? (yes, I would think that higher clockspeed would help, though increasing the number of cores would help more)

What about Core i7? Will having multithreading on top of the 4 cores prove even better?

That link was a bonus for me RAID O I wanted to find out the price of the i5 processors.

I have just read a 4 page review of the i5 series from APC magazine (check there web review) and it suggests that the chipset that's needed can run a new i7 series that has come out, so after say 2yrs you can just replace the cpu and carry on...

However the price for technology is over rated and yes to achieve your goal with the i5 series you need a new m/board P55 chipset and DDR3 ram and an expensive graphics card.

Think about this sum

Intel Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor $200

Intel DP55KG Extreme M/Board $250

low voltage +2200 6gig DDR 3 ram say 300-400

9800 GT or GTX graphics card say 250-300

9800gt or gtx $300? mm what currency is this in?

as for memory no need to get 2200 ^_^

i've had nothing but bad luck with 2000+ memory and in the end if you get 6 dimms its pointless to have that kind of bandwidth as it can't all be utilized (4 dimms in the case of i5..actually anyone know the maximum bandwidth limit supported by the i5?)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft has some PC VR games that could be played with it.
    • As such, many developers will start dropping Windows 10 support in their products Hi! Actual developer here. No we won't. It really doesn't work that way simply because most Windows devs don't target to a specific release of Windows unless we're using a feature that only exists IN a specific version, and that's pretty unusual. The biggest example would be MSFT killing off Windows Mixed Reality in Win 11, but most stuff we write for Win 10 will just work fine in Win 11 and vice versa. The vast majority of software doesn't rely on these things and will continue working on any recent version of Windows. Heck some of my software still runs on WinXP. Where Win 10 users will be left behind is software that relies on new features in Win 11 but again, we tend not to use those unless we're writing specific apps that need those features. In fact, the biggest danger area isn't apps, it's drivers as hardware makers focus on new machines more than supporting legacy devices.
    • Google Chrome finally lets you change the position of the address bar on Android by Aditya Tiwari Google is rolling out a small but useful update to Chrome. The update makes the address bar in the web browser more customizable and accessible. You can now place it at the top or bottom of the screen, as you prefer. The ability to change the position of the address bar in Google Chrome has started rolling out and will be available to all users over the coming weeks. You can long-press on the address bar and select the "Move address bar to bottom" option. Alternatively, you can also go to Settings > Address bar to customize it. "Depending on the size of your hand and your device, one address bar position may feel more comfortable than the other," the company said in a blog post. "We designed this update to give you the flexibility to choose your preferred location — so you can browse with more ease." The address bar is where you can type website names you want to visit. It's a crucial part of our browsing experience and also doubles as the search bar in Google Chrome. The browser's Android version has been around since 2012, and the address bar's top position has remained the default for most of its time. Over the years, Google has enhanced the address bar with additional features, such as the ability to automatically hide when scrolling up on a web page, thereby offering more screen real estate. A bottom-mounted address bar could be a better option for users with small hands or those who prefer to use their device with one hand. Interestingly, this is not the first time Chrome has had a bottom address bar, as Google briefly experimented with the feature in the past. The bottom address bar even made its way to Chrome for iOS, where you can long-press the address bar to toggle between the two options or change it in the settings. It's hard to digest that it took Google so long to add a simple feature. The defunct Windows Phone had this feature as far back as 2012, and Chrome's rival Safari added a Bottom layout option in 2021. Nonetheless, the latest update brings Chrome in line with other browsers that offer a bottom address bar on Android.
    • That's just my understanding of the courts situation with the law with of AI and when could be copyrighted. Found this article about how different area's of the world are handling copyrights - https://www.cooley.com/news/in...uts-varies-around-the-world AI seems to be a disruptive technology so far, like the internet was. Whenever a disruptive tech comes out, it takes a while on what societies accepts, adapts, rejects, and how it ultimately pans out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      DrRonSr earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Sharon dixon earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Parallax Abstraction earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      956400 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidfegan earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      616
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      227
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      166
    5. 5
      Som
      148
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!