Recommended Posts

i have a cable modem connected via USB and it's properties 3 things checked (win xp pro):

- client for microsoft networks

- QoS Packet Scheduler

- Internet Protocol (TCP/IP)

i know that TCP/IP is mandatory but do i need the other two ?

for example i disabled QoS before from the group policy editor by giving "%0" as the value so i thought that it's needless to use QoS Packet Scheduler. or shoud i ?

also what does "client for microsoft networks" do ? if i uncheck it what do i get or lose ?

thanx 4 the answers. :alien:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/83271-client-for-ms-networks-do-i-need-it/
Share on other sites

I'd leave client for microsoft networks there.

But QOS you can safely uncheck. You can do the whole GPO edit but that whole tweak was nothing but BS for home users. I'll bet none of us even have QOS aware apps or routers, it's useless for us, and it didn't take 20% of our bandwidth it did nothing, because we didn't have anything using it. So go head and uncheck that one.

The ISP doesn't need to just your stuff.

I'd say foremost it's a bandwidth limiter. Basically whatever % you give the QOS service is how much bandwidth it'll reseverve for your QOS enabled apps when your connections maxxed out. So say your running a IIS server(which is QOS aware), and your hosting a BF1942 server as well on the same PC. That'll probably use almost all your upload speed so the QOS will kick in and make it to where IIS has whatever amount of bandwidth you set the QOS to. So basically whatever you don on your PC shouldn't affect your QOS aware apps. On top of that it supports other stuff two like if you had two internet connections a qos aware app should be able to use them both and maximize throughput. QOS isn't bad.

But I say you probably won't need it because most likely the only 3 programs you have that use it are windows messenger(don't think MSN messenger has it yet), netmeeting, and IIS server. These come with XP so they're on your CD, but chances are you don't want those program hoggin your bandwidth. Secondly it doesn't do anything at all to non QOS aware apps so you can't say reserve 75% of your bandwidth for counterstrike and get a kick a$$ ping.

I'll try and sumarize into something inteligable because I don't even get what I'm typing(been up too long).

QOS isn't made to offer you on your computer a quality connection, it's more so so that other users on the network can get a quality connection to you. Now on a single PC QOS isn't doing much of anything. But put that QOS service on a network with QOS apps, and then it works great because all your critical applications have a guaranteed amount of bandwidth.

Client For Microsoft Networks is only need if you are networking Microsoft Operating Systems.

If you're just using the internet then all you need is the TCP/IP protocall installed, everything else you may remove.

  yodat said:
yep i use just the net as a network connection and i am not connected to a lan or anything like that.

is there any advantages to turn Client For Microsoft Networks OFF, i mean in terms of security or anyhthing like that (less memory usage  :laugh:  ,etc.)

Yes, lower surface area for attack, from a security standpoint.

You'll close listening ports that "Client for Microsoft Network" Opens to listen for network activity.

Also go to the advanced section of your tcp/ip and select "DISABLE NETBIOS over TCP/IP" this will also increase your protection.

oo yeah thanx 4 the tip.

a few days ago i turned off the anonymous login to NetBIOS in the registry also disabled NetBIOS helper service but i forgot the setting you mentioned.

turning off NETBIOS has any side effects ?

ps: i am using sygate personal firewall

Edited by yodat
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meta explains how EU's "unlawful" ad-free choice ruling hurts users and businesses by Paul Hill Meta has decided to appeal a European Commission (EC) decision announced back on April 23 that saw the firm hit with a €200 million fine for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The decision from the Commission was about the binary choice the social media firm was offering to users in the bloc - that they either see personalized ads, or pay a subscription fee to go ad-free. The EC said it wanted Meta to offer an ad-supported version with less personalization. Now, Meta has hit back at the decision, calling it incorrect and unlawful. Under the Digital Markets Act rules, big companies like Meta with significant platforms were labeled as Gatekeepers (large digital platforms with significant market power) and given specific rules to follow, including requiring GDPR consent in relation to DMA-specific personal data use for showing ads to users. Meta believes that the Commission’s April decision against Meta ignored a Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling from July 2023, which, according to Meta, supports offering users the choice between a subscription or receiving a free service supported by personalized ads. The social media giant believes that the EC’s decision flies in the face of the CJEU judgment and precedents and makes Meta the only company in Europe that is not allowed to use the business model in question. The company says that if it was forced to show ads with reduced personalization, then users, advertisers, and platforms would get “poorer outcomes” - it would also likely hurt Meta’s revenues. While Meta may believe what it says, it’s not the only company operating as a Gatekeeper under the Digital Market Act, many other big tech firms are coming under increasing scrutiny as the EC tries to establish a more level playing field so that big firms don’t take advantage of smaller competitors. Meta says that the mandated Less Personalized Ads service from the EC is unviable and ignores commercial realities. It said that the LPA uses around 90% less data than personalized ads resulting in less user engagements and less sales. While users may say they do not want their data used for personalized ads, Meta believes that without personalization, user experience declines with an almost 800% rise in ads being marked as “irrelevant” or “repetitive”. It is important to note that Meta has not provided an actual number for the amount of complaints it receives. Meta also said that the LPA also leads to worse outcomes for EU advertisers with small and medium-sized enterprises most impacted. It said: Meta has called on the EC to “return to a better system of regulation” after expressing concern about a lack of consistent feedback and the shifting of “goalposts” by the Commission while Meta has tried to comply. It has called on the EC to stick to the text of the DMA and not make it about fines.
    • Idiotic Teams strickes again. "Teams, Teams, I was not joking when I said I'd like to smash every tooth in your head Oh Teams Teams, I was not joking when I said By rights you should be bludgeoned in your bed"
    • KB5060829: Microsoft confirms new upcoming Windows 11 24H2 feature is triggering Firewall by Sayan Sen At the end of June, Microsoft released Windows 11 setup and recovery updates (KB5062233/ KB5060843/ KB5062197/ KB5061090) following the month's non-security previews for 24H2 (KB5060829) and 23H2/22H2 (KB5060826). Today, the company has confirmed that KB5060829 is causing some troubles for systems in regards to Firewall. Microsoft says that IT admins and system admins may notice a recurring error entry in the Security event log related to Windows Firewall With Advanced Security wherein the Event Viewer records event ID 2042, labeled “Config Read Failed” with the message “More data is available” each time the device restarts. Although logged as an error, the tech giant notes that this entry does not indicate a malfunction of the Windows Firewall and as such it can be "safely ignored and disregarded," and that Windows Firewall continues to enforce rules and filter network traffic normally as intended. Microsoft assures that "there is no impact to Windows processes associated to this event." IT support teams and even general users often rely on error-level event entries to detect misconfiguration and other issues (Microsoft itself recommends you do so), so unexpected log noise can trigger unnecessary alerts like these. Interestingly, in this case, the logged event stems from an upcoming feature as Microsoft notes that the "event is related to a feature that is currently under development and not fully implemented." No additional information regarding this new feature has been provided at this time. For those who prefer a cleaner log, administrators can filter out event 2042 in Event Viewer or via PowerShell. In Event Viewer, create a custom view filtering out ID 2042 under the Security log and in PowerShell, use the Get-WinEvent -FilterHashtable parameter. Microsoft says that the team is currently working on a fix and an update will be released later. However, no ETA has been shared today. You can find the issue entry here on Microsoft's official Windows Health dashboard website.
    • Concerning the situation at XBOX (title cancellations, studio closures and firing employees): The management at MS gaming division (Booty, Spencer etc.) has to go. Money and time has been wasted in such amounts that those people have to be held accountable and better managers can take the lead. In most other businesses this would have happened ten years or so ago.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      filminutz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      SteveJaye earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Philsl earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      433
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      158
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      146
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      65
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!