Recommended Posts

i have a cable modem connected via USB and it's properties 3 things checked (win xp pro):

- client for microsoft networks

- QoS Packet Scheduler

- Internet Protocol (TCP/IP)

i know that TCP/IP is mandatory but do i need the other two ?

for example i disabled QoS before from the group policy editor by giving "%0" as the value so i thought that it's needless to use QoS Packet Scheduler. or shoud i ?

also what does "client for microsoft networks" do ? if i uncheck it what do i get or lose ?

thanx 4 the answers. :alien:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/83271-client-for-ms-networks-do-i-need-it/
Share on other sites

I'd leave client for microsoft networks there.

But QOS you can safely uncheck. You can do the whole GPO edit but that whole tweak was nothing but BS for home users. I'll bet none of us even have QOS aware apps or routers, it's useless for us, and it didn't take 20% of our bandwidth it did nothing, because we didn't have anything using it. So go head and uncheck that one.

The ISP doesn't need to just your stuff.

I'd say foremost it's a bandwidth limiter. Basically whatever % you give the QOS service is how much bandwidth it'll reseverve for your QOS enabled apps when your connections maxxed out. So say your running a IIS server(which is QOS aware), and your hosting a BF1942 server as well on the same PC. That'll probably use almost all your upload speed so the QOS will kick in and make it to where IIS has whatever amount of bandwidth you set the QOS to. So basically whatever you don on your PC shouldn't affect your QOS aware apps. On top of that it supports other stuff two like if you had two internet connections a qos aware app should be able to use them both and maximize throughput. QOS isn't bad.

But I say you probably won't need it because most likely the only 3 programs you have that use it are windows messenger(don't think MSN messenger has it yet), netmeeting, and IIS server. These come with XP so they're on your CD, but chances are you don't want those program hoggin your bandwidth. Secondly it doesn't do anything at all to non QOS aware apps so you can't say reserve 75% of your bandwidth for counterstrike and get a kick a$$ ping.

I'll try and sumarize into something inteligable because I don't even get what I'm typing(been up too long).

QOS isn't made to offer you on your computer a quality connection, it's more so so that other users on the network can get a quality connection to you. Now on a single PC QOS isn't doing much of anything. But put that QOS service on a network with QOS apps, and then it works great because all your critical applications have a guaranteed amount of bandwidth.

Client For Microsoft Networks is only need if you are networking Microsoft Operating Systems.

If you're just using the internet then all you need is the TCP/IP protocall installed, everything else you may remove.

  yodat said:
yep i use just the net as a network connection and i am not connected to a lan or anything like that.

is there any advantages to turn Client For Microsoft Networks OFF, i mean in terms of security or anyhthing like that (less memory usage  :laugh:  ,etc.)

Yes, lower surface area for attack, from a security standpoint.

You'll close listening ports that "Client for Microsoft Network" Opens to listen for network activity.

Also go to the advanced section of your tcp/ip and select "DISABLE NETBIOS over TCP/IP" this will also increase your protection.

oo yeah thanx 4 the tip.

a few days ago i turned off the anonymous login to NetBIOS in the registry also disabled NetBIOS helper service but i forgot the setting you mentioned.

turning off NETBIOS has any side effects ?

ps: i am using sygate personal firewall

Edited by yodat
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Never use an in-browser password manager. It creates a barrier to using any other web browser.
    • I have always wondered if there is any difference between .BAT and .CMD files!
    • I will confirm the Vista hate was ridiculous. They had a point before SP1 and too many didn't use newer components at launch, misleading some to believe it was bad. It really wasn't (after SP1.) The jump from 98/ME to XP didn't get a bad reaction at all from what I remember. 8 was awful. 10 for the most part ran pretty well but people disliked the telemetry and standard MS shenanigans, but 11 is definitely worse in some ways.
    • What I can confirm to not be exaggerations or misinformation is the slowness of the standard right click menus and the Task Manager in Windows 11, even on brand spanking new bare installs.
    • Linux 6.16-rc2: Smaller than usual, but with notable network and bcachefs tweaks by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel, has just released the second release candidate of Linux 6.16. Following the release of Linux 6.15, developers submitted their new features to be merged with Linux 6.16. These release candidates are focused on polishing the kernel before release, following the merging of new features. In his weekly mailing list post, Torvalds noticed that things were pretty quiet this week and that this could be due to developers taking a summer vacation or just taking a break following a large merge window a few weeks ago. This isn’t uncommon at this point in the cycle and Torvalds expects more activity next week. Networking and bcachefs dominate changes The second release candidate, despite being small, still brings some notable changes, namely network drivers, Bluetooth drivers, and bcachefs, a copy-on-write filesystem for Linux. The improvements to network drivers have a direct impact on end users, it means that newer networking hardware works out of the box when you install Linux and existing problematic drivers get fixed. There were also improvements made to the Rust infrastructure and core networking changes. Implementing Rust in the kernel is good for users as it has memory safety built in, leaving hackers less to attack in Linux systems. Rust has received backlash by some opinionated Linux developers who don’t want to learn a new language, but it doesn’t look like it’s going anywhere. Under the hood: specific fixes This week, a diverse set of developers have contributed fixes to the kernel that improve kernel stability, Bluetooth connectivity, file sharing over SMB, and virtualization performance. Some specific changes this week include: Fixes for CPU burning, firmware stats, and use-after-free (UAF) issues with the ath11k and ath12k Wi-Fi drivers. Various fixes for UAF, NULL pointer differences and advertising issues in Bluetooth drivers. Improvements to Server Message Block (SMB) related to directory cache reuse and a fix for performance regression with deferred closes. In KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine), there are fixes for SEV-SNP support, memory pre-faulting, and ARM64 selftests. The SMB fixes are notable because it's an important protocol in networked Windows environments. It helps with file sharing, printer sharing, and Active Directory integration. By improving Linux’s support for this protocol, readers using SMB in Linux to talk to Windows machines will have a smoother experience. Ongoing development Linux 6.16 is due to get seven or eight release candidates over the cycle so there are now five or six weeks until the stable version arrives. Even when it is out, most people’s first use of this kernel will be when distributions decide to ship it, as they can be tricky to install manually. Stay tuned each week as we bring you all the new changes which each new release candidate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      625
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      276
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      152
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      115
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!