ATI graphics will power the next generation xbox?


Recommended Posts

the specs i would see for the next Xbox would be this.

IBM 6 core chips running @ 3.2ghz with architectural changes and enhancement over the current CPU in the Xbox 360 so instead of a 6 threaded chop it be a 16 threaded chip or close to assuming MS uses IBMs newest chips they are developing ti do 12 threads or more per chip.

the GPU will be a DX11 based derivative or so and the system would have 1.2 to 1.5gb of ram now if they chose 1.2 i would assume 200mb would be for the OS witch be running a windows 7 based kernel . i also see an increases in the fast eDram on the system from 10mb up to 64mb

the specs i would see for the next Xbox would be this.

IBM 6 core chips running @ 3.2ghz with architectural changes and enhancement over the current CPU in the Xbox 360 so instead of a 6 threaded chop it be a 16 threaded chip or close to assuming MS uses IBMs newest chips they are developing ti do 12 threads or more per chip.

the GPU will be a DX11 based derivative or so and the system would have 1.2 to 1.5gb of ram now if they chose 1.2 i would assume 200mb would be for the OS witch be running a windows 7 based kernel . i also see an increases in the fast eDram on the system from 10mb up to 64mb

Honestly, releasing anything less than 1.5GB would be retarded. We've heard about the memory complaints for a while now. Hell, the 360 would have had 256MB had Epic not pushed them to make it 512MB for Gears of War 1. Personally, with memory dropping in price rapidly these days, 2GB of GDDR5 shouldn't cost too much, and I'm sure there will be something better by then anyway.

With current crop of ATI video card (58XX) game ported from the Xbox 360 already run at crazy FPS in 2560x1600. Some even run great at 3 Monitor setup (7634x1200). It's really time for a new system because new video card on PC have not meaning whatsoever

Honestly, releasing anything less than 1.5GB would be retarded. We've heard about the memory complaints for a while now. Hell, the 360 would have had 256MB had Epic not pushed them to make it 512MB for Gears of War 1. Personally, with memory dropping in price rapidly these days, 2GB of GDDR5 shouldn't cost too much, and I'm sure there will be something better by then anyway.

actually 256mb was never an option Ms always went for 512 . but either way that is till better then the PS3 witch has only 256mb of ram for the GPU , but yes i think 1.5gb at least be great for the next xbox so developers could push out more realism and have plenty of GPU ram to go around

ATTN: DIRTY LARRY

edit: obviously he was wrong on the release date but he was pretty much on to something with the AMD thing

https://www.neowin.net/news/gamers/09/04/29...oner-than-later

Edited by Massiveterra

With everything on the PC side of things going to 4GB now, desktops/laptops, while netbooks have 1GB. I think even 1.5GB for the next xbox is on the low range. 2GB at the least is what I see, more ram so you can load up higher textures etc, next comes a new optical media to hold all the game data. Before people jump on the bluray bit though, I doubt MS will use that exact tech, there is a big advance in holodisc tech, using a tweaked bluray laser to read the holodisc media. And we're talking 1TB per DVD sized holodisc here.

Since the drive tech is already in use, and just needs to be tweaked (bluray drives), the only pricey side to it would be the holomedia discs themselves. But 1TB is on the huge side, to save costs you could go with a smaller disc, and hold something like 100-500GB. Just an idea, but if we're talking 2012 at the least, who knows what the prices on this tech, or at what level, it will be at.

"A 360 slim is possible and would produce very little heat if MS takes it's time and does it right. "

No. You can not stop the production of the actual heat. Its a basic principal of electronics and thermodynamics, all you can do is find better ways to dissipate it. The issue with the 360 is not the heat produced, but the fact that their cooling solution was poorly designed and was not efficiently moving the heat away from the parts generating it.

Decreasing die size helps by lowering both resistance and capacitance, but eventually we will reach a point where transistors will be so small we need better shielding in order to avoid electron migration from one transistor to the next.

With current crop of ATI video card (58XX) game ported from the Xbox 360 already run at crazy FPS in 2560x1600. Some even run great at 3 Monitor setup (7634x1200). It's really time for a new system because new video card on PC have not meaning whatsoever

I didn't quite get that last part. You say PC gamers have no reason to upgrade their GPUs after 58xx?

I'm expecting a redesigned 360 + Natal in later 2010 or 2011 before we even start to hear about the next Xbox.

I mean, with the moves they did with basically killing off the Premium and slotting in the Elite in it's place, some sorta Natal bundle is on the way for sure.

And by next year they should be able to shrink all the chips to 45-40nm easy, swap out the DVD drive for a slimmer laptop type one and you can get a 360 slim. And before people bang on about "heat and RRoD", overheating isn't the sole reason for the majority of the original RRoD problems as many have found out by managing to fix their systems. A 360 slim is possible and would produce very little heat if MS takes it's time and does it right.

natal will never be incorporated in the 360 machine, some people have it standing vertically, some people play on projectors and their 360 is behind them, some people have their tv's hung on the wall and like there to be nothing below it. a bundle with natal is a definate tho. 100%

360 slim is not likely either, theres too many people with the existing hardrives. the ps3 calls itself slim now and its still bigger than the 360, its not that important, just get the 45nm chips out

Yeah, after thinking about it, 2012 seems a little too close away. Considering MS are pegging Natal as the next generation, or essentially a second generation for the 360, I think 2013 at the absolute earliest. Dev kits are just going to get cheaper and cheaper, along with the console price. We'll eventually be buying XBOX 360 Elites around the $100-$150 price range by 2012, easy, so they'll still sell.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!