Is is a good idea to use Windows Server as a router?


Recommended Posts

A copy of Windows is going to cost more than a router. I would get a router, but if you're going to use the PC, you might as well put Linux or FreeBSD on it. Windows is a waste of money.

Agreed. Not to mention the power costs alone will waste extra $$$

I was going to say the power cost would end up way more than the router over a few years.

MAYBE if you use your Windows Server PC all the time, than you could possibly do it. But if you are ONLY using it as a router, I strongly suggest no.

why would you want to use a windows server as router for a home network? Or a linux server for that matter

- it consumes more power

- is generally less stable

- costs more

Unless you have a very good reason it would be a waste of time and money

Thanks for the input!

cost is not an issue since i already have that computer running as a file server and for some other uses. I do have access to msdnaa for windows server.

So the quetion is simple, who will perform better? If a dedicted router will perform better then I guess I'll spend the extra cost to get one. Otherwise why not use the PC as a router?

Thanks for the input!

cost is not an issue since i already have that computer running as a file server and for some other uses. I do have access to msdnaa for windows server.

So the quetion is simple, who will perform better? If a dedicted router will perform better then I guess I'll spend the extra cost to get one. Otherwise why not use the PC as a router?

I'm guessing this is your home network? There's no real difference. If you already have the machine up and running you have nothing to lose by giving it a try.

'I've heard too many stories on bad routers that always crash/drop connections etc etc under heavy use"

This can be true for some home routers.. But using windows is going to give you less features and more complexity. Unless your running say ISA or something your going to be very limited in what you can do, or at min its going to be more complicated to setup.

If you want to leverage pc hardware to use as your router -- then go the linux router distro gateway way, pfsense, ipcop, smoothwall, m0n0wall, etc. Or if you want to use it as a file server, domain controller, email, etc. etc. Then go with a distro like ClarkConnect or SME Server which are distros designed to be a gateway for your network while also providing file sharing features, content filtering, caching, etc.

I have run all the above listed distros at one time or another, and currently use pfsense -- I would personally never go back to the limitations of a soho router. When I can leverage a junk p3 800 for example as a screaming router with all the bells and whistles.

'I've heard too many stories on bad routers that always crash/drop connections etc etc under heavy use"

This can be true for some home routers.. But using windows is going to give you less features and more complexity. Unless your running say ISA or something your going to be very limited in what you can do, or at min its going to be more complicated to setup.

If you want to leverage pc hardware to use as your router -- then go the linux router distro gateway way, pfsense, ipcop, smoothwall, m0n0wall, etc. Or if you want to use it as a file server, domain controller, email, etc. etc. Then go with a distro like ClarkConnect or SME Server which are distros designed to be a gateway for your network while also providing file sharing features, content filtering, caching, etc.

I have run all the above listed distros at one time or another, and currently use pfsense -- I would personally never go back to the limitations of a soho router. When I can leverage a junk p3 800 for example as a screaming router with all the bells and whistles.

Hey thanks, looks like I can give SME Server a try!

yes it's a home network with 3 clients. It's just that I've heard too many stories on bad routers that always crash/drop connections etc etc under heavy use, so i thought a PC might be a good alternative.

Well, that is true to some extent, but the kind of heavy use in question can really only be generated in one way on a home network, and that is with Bittorrent. These routers normally do address translation in addition to just routing (so you can have multiple clients with just one public IP address), which is somewhat more demanding. It's possible to configure a torrent client in such a way that it will attempt to open hundreds or even thousands of connections a second and maintain thousands of open connections. This can overwhelm a router, and is really outside of the kind of use they were designed for. In fact, if you tried hard enough you could even encounter hard limits such as the port number being a 16-bit variable, which results in a total limit of about 64,500 connections (which don't necessarily have to be open, they can have different states) for the whole network (assuming the address translation implementation can handle that load). This isn't much of a real problem, since it can be resolved by just changing the settings.

"Hey thanks, looks like I can give SME Server a try! "

I would suggest you try CC before SME.. CC community version is FREE, some people don't look at the site enough and think that CC costs money -- only for the enterprise version that comes with support.

"Hey thanks, looks like I can give SME Server a try! "

I would suggest you try CC before SME.. CC community version is FREE, some people don't look at the site enough and think that CC costs money -- only for the enterprise version that comes with support.

haha you got that right, I saw the word buy and 30 day trail and left the site.. anyway thanks again.

Windows Server with Routing and Remote Access works way better than home routers and and is comparible to a enterprise router from Dell but you still would need to buy a switch to allow more than one pc on the network.

also with the Linux suggestions I have to say that there are tons of great distros to try

The plus to using a server is you dont have to power cycle the damn thing like 99% of the home routers I have used after a year of heavy use

I am currently using a PowerEdge 1430 Server with Server 2008 for routing hooked into PowerConnect 5424 switch and a D-Link WBR-1310 for wifi access

Edited by winrez
why would you want to use a windows server as router for a home network? Or a linux server for that matter

- it consumes more power

- is generally less stable

- costs more

Unless you have a very good reason it would be a waste of time and money

You do know that most "home" routers are running some sort of linux on them? so your stability comment is kinda incorrect .

If you don't care about price and want the ultimate in configuration and features, give Windows Server a try... I think you'd get more use out of it once you try some of it's more advanced features, and file sharing and remote access, terminal server, active directory, and such are much more functional and useful to have around.

If you want wireless pick up a nice Cisco access point - run dedicated channels for each type of WiFi and w/ and w/o encryption if you want for best performance. ^_^

The plus to using a server is you dont have to power cycle the damn thing like 99% of the home routers I have used after a year of heavy use

Is this a joke? A yearly reboot? Do you run Windows for years without installing any updates?

I am currently using a PowerEdge 1430 Server with Server 2008 for routing hooked into PowerConnect 5424 switch and a D-Link WBR-1310 for wifi access

Please tell me this is doing more than just routing on a home network. Talk about overkill.

Virtually all home users would be better of with a dedicated cheapo router. Running a full-blown server OS just adds unneeded complexity without offering anything of value.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!