Intel SSD now brings TRIM support


Recommended Posts

DO NOT UPGRADE LOTS OF PEOPLE ARE HAVING PROBLEMS WITH DRIVE FAILING - RUMERS SAY THAT ITS A 50:50 CHANCE OF FAILER

http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/intel-p...nder-windows-7/

Enjoying the speed of one of Intel's recently-launched 34nm SSDs? We've good news, as your already-potent drive is now likely to get a whole lot quicker courtesy of a couple of new Intel-provided tools.

With Microsoft's Windows 7 now out in the open, Intel has served up support for the operating system's TRIM command with the introduction of new firmware and an SSD Optimiser app.

Intel reckons the firmware update will deliver up to a 40 per cent increase in sequential write speeds on its 34nm X25-M 160GB drive, and what's useful is that Intel's SSD Optimiser will provide TRIM-like functionality on Windows XP and Windows Vista, too.

Itching to give it a go? The firmware upgrade can be found at www.intel.com/go/ssdfirmware and the Intel SSD Optimiser is over at www.intel.com/go/ssdtoolbox.

Soruce

Edited by master2k27
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/838620-intel-ssd-now-brings-trim-support/
Share on other sites

but intel has the best paformace and even more with this new firmware update

but also the min size is 80GB what is yours?

i was geting OCZ Agility too where does it say it supports TRIM

64GB. The new 1.4 firmware came out 2 weeks ago with TRIM support.

Well, I know the Intel drive is faster, but for the price I paid, it made sense. All I wanted was overall snappiness in Windows, and I got it with the OCZ (7.3 score on Windows 7 Rating). I doubt I'd see a huge difference with the Intel drive. But like I said, Intel drives are awesome and that's what I'll go for when prices go down.

DO NOT UPGRADE LOTS OF PEOPLE ARE HAVING PROBLEMS WITH DRIVE FAILING - RUMERS SAY THAT ITS A 50:50 CHANCE OF FAILER
If you're going to make a statement like that, you'd better provide some evidence. There's no ****ing way a company like Intel would mass-distribute a product that they knew to have a 50% failure rate, though it looks like they pulled the download.

And if it's true, it's yet another reminder that SSD's are still infant technology. The reliability of flash-based storage is still questionable and I won't be upgrading to SSD's for another couple of years.

If you're going to make a statement like that, you'd better provide some evidence. There's no ****ing way a company like Intel would mass-distribute a product that they knew to have a 50% failure rate, though it looks like they pulled the download.

You'd think so, but considering how many bricked drives there are from the thread in the above link, it looks like they didn't test very thoroughly. I find it hard to believe a problem like this would completely slip through testing.

If you're going to make a statement like that, you'd better provide some evidence. There's no ****ing way a company like Intel would mass-distribute a product that they knew to have a 50% failure rate, though it looks like they pulled the download.

http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/intel-p...nder-windows-7/

It happens. I remember my Seagate being bricked because of firmware issues a couple months back

duh i know SSD is a new tec

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1463671

and the intel website too

Thank goodness I didn't have any problems with my SSD. I did have to reboot after logging into Windows 7 the first time but after that it worked fine.

but restart you pc then it might go

If you're going to make a statement like that, you'd better provide some evidence. There's no ****ing way a company like Intel would mass-distribute a product that they knew to have a 50% failure rate, though it looks like they pulled the download.

And if it's true, it's yet another reminder that SSD's are still infant technology. The reliability of flash-based storage is still questionable and I won't be upgrading to SSD's for another couple of years.

fail !

I was at the intel channel conference today and they "announced" this little tidbit.. looks like the interweb broke it yesterday..

Just wanted to give everyone the heads up!

Intel's new (in disguise) products will have an MSRP starting at $85 for a 40gb ssd

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1111/14/

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/...-2485-msrp.aspx

http://www.kingston.com/press/2009/flash/10c.asp

Reading the reviews, it has a 7.5 out of 7.9 Windows 7 experience index. This could mean KILLER load times and performance for the OS at a REALLY reasonable price. We're talking a rated 170mb/s read speed that actually goes up to over 230mb/s. The write speed can be scoffed at, but it's not much worse than a standard drive, and the sequential write speed is where it's at, anyways.

I was at the intel channel conference today and they "announced" this little tidbit.. looks like the interweb broke it yesterday..

Just wanted to give everyone the heads up!

Intel's new (in disguise) products will have an MSRP starting at $85 for a 40gb ssd

http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1111/14/

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/...-2485-msrp.aspx

http://www.kingston.com/press/2009/flash/10c.asp

Reading the reviews, it has a 7.5 out of 7.9 Windows 7 experience index. This could mean KILLER load times and performance for the OS at a REALLY reasonable price. We're talking a rated 170mb/s read speed that actually goes up to over 230mb/s. The write speed can be scoffed at, but it's not much worse than a standard drive, and the sequential write speed is where it's at, anyways.

resonable price , very good

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!