Strange Lag when extracting/installing something


Recommended Posts

Right lads this might be a normal thing but I thought, well bugger me I will just see if anyone has the same problem (if I may call it a problem)

When I use Winrar or 7zip to extract something there is a lag in the whole system (including installing a game or program), things open up with a certain delay. Now when I look up at TaskManager, there is hardly any CPU usage. Its not so much of a problem but like I said it sort of pester me.

Win7 Ult 64bit

Q6600

4GB of Ram

ATI 3850HD 512MB

Should that be a normal thing..!

  allan said:
Give it a few days for the system (and superfetch) to settle in and see if it's still an issue.

I have got my Windows 7 copy early than the public release through my subscription, so no I hardly believe it is the superfetch.

  M.F.D.K said:
I have got my Windows 7 copy early than the public release through my subscription, so no I hardly believe it is the superfetch.

Yeah, I did too, though I only just got around to installing it the other day. I've already started to notice a diffence in "snappiness" with each passing day - though I guess that's not the issue with your system. Sorry - just a thought.

And re: neufuse's post - Although I had Defender (and the Defender service) disabled with Vista, when I upgraded to 7 (yeah, I did an upgrade - had to for a number of reasons) I found that Defender & the service were reenabled & I had to set the service back to "disabled"

  Draconian Guppy said:
Yeah me too. I thought I was going mad... :s

Not to say you aren't, you know :D

As was the case with Vista, Windows 7 superfetch will take a few days to "learn your system & habits" and "settle down". As it does, everything from boot time to app loading should get a little quicker.

Windows 7 has been very smooth and snappy after a couple of days or so, so i understand you've got to give it a bit of time to settle down. Its been great and everything works great, as i mentioned it before, its not so much of problem, but would be great to find out why

its lagging, might be due to overclocking, although i hardly believe thats the case since i never experienced a heating or throttling problem, games work great and apps open up almost instantly.

  neufuse said:
do you have an anti-virust/spyware/ or still have windows defender installed and running? those tend to to realtime scanning which can cause these pauses and lags

I use MSE combined with windows firewall.

  M.F.D.K said:
Windows 7 has been very smooth and snappy after a couple of days or so, so i understand you've got to give it a bit of time to settle down. Its been great and everything works great, as i mentioned it before, its not so much of problem, but would be great to find out why

its lagging, might be due to overclocking, although i hardly believe thats the case since i never experienced a heating or throttling problem, games work great and apps open up almost instantly.

I've had MSE slow down like crazy when downloading large files after its done, when the real time scanning kicks in, I see large pauses while it scans it... also get this during large file copy operations too.. turn it off an snappy as heck, I get the same result with ESET NOD32 and its a good power system im doing this on (i7 920 system with 6GB DDR3 RAM)

  • 1 month later...

I still need an answer to this problem, it's really hard to find a solution.

I also get freezes/lag when extracting something big / installing an app or game / when transferring things between harddrives.

The transfer rate between the harddrives is a bout 40-50mb/s.

My specs:

Gigabyte P35

Q6600

2GB ram

8800gts

Win 7 64bit ultimate

I run Microsoft Security Essentials for AV, ran NOD32 before but that didn't help.

Windows Defender is turned off.

Pagefile is not on my windows drive, haven't noticed any difference.

Any tips or reason why things lock up and lag?

All drivers are updated and should be installed correctly.

You're right. That IS odd.

How old is the HDD with Windows 7 on it?

Are we talking about IDE hard drives here that have a 20mb/sec maximum transfer rate?

Or are we talking about PATA 60mb/sec or SATA 2 110mb/sec drives?

Having your pagefile on a seperate hard drive is a great start, some AV's are known to slow down machines quite severely tho.

They are both sata drives, the motherboards sata controller is in RAID mode right now due to I had a raid before but not anymore, do you think if I switch to AHCI mode it might get fixed? I did not have any issues before in XP though when I had it in raid mode. I have the latest intel driver for the sata controller (ICH9)

How full (or empty) is your ram during this time? In the past I have had WinRAR use up nearly all my ram as it was extracting large files, to the point my system lagged horribly until it was done and my ram was freed once again from the evil clutches of WinRAR.

I personally do not have this problem with 7zip though.

I took a peek at the taskmanager while transferring stuff from one drive to the other and noticed that where it says "Physical Memory", there is:

Total

Cached

Available

Free

I don't know what the difference between available and free is but when I'm idle, free is at about 250-300mb, but when I transfer or extract stuff it goes down to 0 (zero). Could it just be that I need more ram? or can I configure it so that it doesn't cache as much ram to other useless stuff?

I'm thankful for any suggestions.

The important value is Available I think.....Free is how much ram you have free after superfetch has preloaded stuff, Available is how much ram you have if Superfetch was to unload everything it was holding (which it does if you do need that ram). If that number drops very low (200-300MB) you will often have crappy system performance until whatever action you are doing is finished.

Well, i have no real issue with extracting in WinRar. I set my temporary extraction path in Winrar to the same drive that i store things on as well though.

Default behaviour of winrar is extracting to RAM, then dump to C: temp folder, then copy/move to D: storage/extraction location.

This takes two long copy operations as the file is written to C: temporarily, then moved to the hard drive you actually want it extracted to.

With the temporary extraction folder set to the same drive you're storing the extracted content on, it's one long copy operation.

Winrar extracts teh file into ram and then into say, D:\rartemp and then moves it to the appropriate location on the same hard drive -

which as you should know already, move operations on the same hard drive under windows/NTFS are almost instant.

Just the path reference is re-written so it appears to be at d:\blah\extracted-path and the actual data remains in the same spot.

You can change the temporary extraction path for all winrar actions by going to options > settings > paths and unticking "Use only for removable disks".

This shouldn't affect any installers/uninstaller actions though. It might be worthwhile if you just double checked you have actually disabled the pagefile on c: and haven't simply created a 2nd pagefile on another hard drive.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have always wondered if there is any difference between .BAT and .CMD files!
    • I will confirm the Vista hate was ridiculous. They had a point before SP1 and too many didn't use newer components at launch, misleading some to believe it was bad. It really wasn't (after SP1.) The jump from 98/ME to XP didn't get a bad reaction at all from what I remember. 8 was awful. 10 for the most part ran pretty well but people disliked the telemetry and standard MS shenanigans, but 11 is definitely worse in some ways.
    • What I can confirm to not be exaggerations or misinformation is the slowness of the standard right click menus and the Task Manager in Windows 11, even on brand spanking new bare installs.
    • Linux 6.16-rc2: Smaller than usual, but with notable network and bcachefs tweaks by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel, has just released the second release candidate of Linux 6.16. Following the release of Linux 6.15, developers submitted their new features to be merged with Linux 6.16. These release candidates are focused on polishing the kernel before release, following the merging of new features. In his weekly mailing list post, Torvalds noticed that things were pretty quiet this week and that this could be due to developers taking a summer vacation or just taking a break following a large merge window a few weeks ago. This isn’t uncommon at this point in the cycle and Torvalds expects more activity next week. Networking and bcachefs dominate changes The second release candidate, despite being small, still brings some notable changes, namely network drivers, Bluetooth drivers, and bcachefs, a copy-on-write filesystem for Linux. The improvements to network drivers have a direct impact on end users, it means that newer networking hardware works out of the box when you install Linux and existing problematic drivers get fixed. There were also improvements made to the Rust infrastructure and core networking changes. Implementing Rust in the kernel is good for users as it has memory safety built in, leaving hackers less to attack in Linux systems. Rust has received backlash by some opinionated Linux developers who don’t want to learn a new language, but it doesn’t look like it’s going anywhere. Under the hood: specific fixes This week, a diverse set of developers have contributed fixes to the kernel that improve kernel stability, Bluetooth connectivity, file sharing over SMB, and virtualization performance. Some specific changes this week include: Fixes for CPU burning, firmware stats, and use-after-free (UAF) issues with the ath11k and ath12k Wi-Fi drivers. Various fixes for UAF, NULL pointer differences and advertising issues in Bluetooth drivers. Improvements to Server Message Block (SMB) related to directory cache reuse and a fix for performance regression with deferred closes. In KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine), there are fixes for SEV-SNP support, memory pre-faulting, and ARM64 selftests. The SMB fixes are notable because it's an important protocol in networked Windows environments. It helps with file sharing, printer sharing, and Active Directory integration. By improving Linux’s support for this protocol, readers using SMB in Linux to talk to Windows machines will have a smoother experience. Ongoing development Linux 6.16 is due to get seven or eight release candidates over the cycle so there are now five or six weeks until the stable version arrives. Even when it is out, most people’s first use of this kernel will be when distributions decide to ship it, as they can be tricky to install manually. Stay tuned each week as we bring you all the new changes which each new release candidate.
    • Just checked my B650 Motherboard again, nothing there as yet, Guess 800 series getting it first, which i can understand as that's newer series, and chipset. I'll check again in a few days or a week depending on how busy i am
  • Recent Achievements

    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      624
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      276
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      152
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      115
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!