• 0

is it just me, or does Kaspersky not run so good these days?


Question

been using for a good 4 years, license just ran out on my 2009 AV, so switched to the ISS 2010 as some kind person here gave me a free serial number froma win7 promo. anyway, i hardly use all its faeatrues, really just as an AV, with pro active defense off etc. but, my PC now takes AAAaages to boot now, never used too! my mum just bought a three user license too from PC world, hers and my dads Laptops are complaining of the same issue so she tells me!!

dont get me wrong, i loved Kaspserky in the past, just wondering if anyone else is feeling this bloat recently too?

Cheers G

Recommended Posts

  • 0

what is ISS 2010 ?

I use KAV 2010 on my laptop....vista ultimate. seems ok....although this newer 2010 version has gotten more flashy and lots of moving pictures in the menu which is a sign they are following Norton's bloat style.... I have to look at it later when I get home.....how it performs during a scan, cpu/ram usage..

  • 0

It's not just you. I used the one from the from the party pack before I renewed my NOD32 license and it had a noticeable impact on performance. It received an update immediately after install and caused a BSOD. Not a good way to win a potential customer.

  • 0
I have Kaspersky Internet Security 2010, if I ditch what and get MSE do I need a new firewall or is Vista's firewall enough, I connect to the internet through a router.

Comodo firewall is decent. http://www.comodo.com/home/download/downlo...p?prod=firewall

Install just the firewall.

  • 0
on my wifes laptop downloads speed drop 40% when kaspersky is on

the same thing i've been experiencing, so i turned it off and now speeds are back to normal. Thinking about just leaving it off and using the firewall on the router.

  • 0

Definitely not just you. My dad has 2-3 licenses of it and still runs it on his PC and on a server box. It slows things down BIG time but he doesn't want to switch until the licenses expires. I've been telling him about MSE but since it's still a fairly new AV he isn't 100% confident about it yet. I used to use Kaspersky for awhile too but realized how much it slowed down my system as a whole. Not worth it.

  • 0
Definitely not just you. My dad has 2-3 licenses of it and still runs it on his PC and on a server box. It slows things down BIG time but he doesn't want to switch until the licenses expires. I've been telling him about MSE but since it's still a fairly new AV he isn't 100% confident about it yet. I used to use Kaspersky for awhile too but realized how much it slowed down my system as a whole. Not worth it.

I hear ya.

Tell him to go with Avira.

2nd behind G-Data in protection rate according to av-comparatives.org, light as hell (~8 MBs most of the time), and since implementing their new updating system, every update is like ~80 kb lolz.

Rock solid.

  • 0

yeah you are right kaspersky 2010 is not at all good it is very heavy for the system,i recently shifted to norton 2010 (for my desktop) and bit defender internet security 2010 (for laptop) both of them are very good alternatives . now the system is very smooth in its operations!!!

if you want 3 months of trial of bit defender go to this link

http://www.bitdefender.com/media/trials/ro...r_isecurity.exe

  • 0

actually, (and as the OP of this thread), i gave it another go! It was the ISS i have via my mums spare license. I didnt want/need have the crap thats on their, i.e proactove defense etc, so i done a custom install this time with only the essentials, i.e. web AV, IM AV, etc etc. Runs very smooth again!

Reccomend it now!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      137
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!