• 0

is it just me, or does Kaspersky not run so good these days?


Question

been using for a good 4 years, license just ran out on my 2009 AV, so switched to the ISS 2010 as some kind person here gave me a free serial number froma win7 promo. anyway, i hardly use all its faeatrues, really just as an AV, with pro active defense off etc. but, my PC now takes AAAaages to boot now, never used too! my mum just bought a three user license too from PC world, hers and my dads Laptops are complaining of the same issue so she tells me!!

dont get me wrong, i loved Kaspserky in the past, just wondering if anyone else is feeling this bloat recently too?

Cheers G

Recommended Posts

  • 0

what is ISS 2010 ?

I use KAV 2010 on my laptop....vista ultimate. seems ok....although this newer 2010 version has gotten more flashy and lots of moving pictures in the menu which is a sign they are following Norton's bloat style.... I have to look at it later when I get home.....how it performs during a scan, cpu/ram usage..

  • 0

It's not just you. I used the one from the from the party pack before I renewed my NOD32 license and it had a noticeable impact on performance. It received an update immediately after install and caused a BSOD. Not a good way to win a potential customer.

  • 0
I have Kaspersky Internet Security 2010, if I ditch what and get MSE do I need a new firewall or is Vista's firewall enough, I connect to the internet through a router.

Comodo firewall is decent. http://www.comodo.com/home/download/downlo...p?prod=firewall

Install just the firewall.

  • 0
on my wifes laptop downloads speed drop 40% when kaspersky is on

the same thing i've been experiencing, so i turned it off and now speeds are back to normal. Thinking about just leaving it off and using the firewall on the router.

  • 0

Definitely not just you. My dad has 2-3 licenses of it and still runs it on his PC and on a server box. It slows things down BIG time but he doesn't want to switch until the licenses expires. I've been telling him about MSE but since it's still a fairly new AV he isn't 100% confident about it yet. I used to use Kaspersky for awhile too but realized how much it slowed down my system as a whole. Not worth it.

  • 0
Definitely not just you. My dad has 2-3 licenses of it and still runs it on his PC and on a server box. It slows things down BIG time but he doesn't want to switch until the licenses expires. I've been telling him about MSE but since it's still a fairly new AV he isn't 100% confident about it yet. I used to use Kaspersky for awhile too but realized how much it slowed down my system as a whole. Not worth it.

I hear ya.

Tell him to go with Avira.

2nd behind G-Data in protection rate according to av-comparatives.org, light as hell (~8 MBs most of the time), and since implementing their new updating system, every update is like ~80 kb lolz.

Rock solid.

  • 0

yeah you are right kaspersky 2010 is not at all good it is very heavy for the system,i recently shifted to norton 2010 (for my desktop) and bit defender internet security 2010 (for laptop) both of them are very good alternatives . now the system is very smooth in its operations!!!

if you want 3 months of trial of bit defender go to this link

http://www.bitdefender.com/media/trials/ro...r_isecurity.exe

  • 0

actually, (and as the OP of this thread), i gave it another go! It was the ISS i have via my mums spare license. I didnt want/need have the crap thats on their, i.e proactove defense etc, so i done a custom install this time with only the essentials, i.e. web AV, IM AV, etc etc. Runs very smooth again!

Reccomend it now!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!