Top Gear Series 14

[RadishTM Veteran]

Funny as hell and that 133 Car was a good nippy machine, did any one notice the very HOT girl when Jeremy Clarkson did the news.. the girl in the middle, damm fit :p

You talking about the brunette/ginger chick? :p

Radish?

[peacemf]

girl was hot :)

ross kemp was funny!

[Sethos]

No Top Gear next week, that makes me a sad panda :(

[Spookie]

P.S. Man in boot - Ross Kemp ROFL!

I caught that too, nice touch. :p

[tsupersonic]

The tunnel was awesome :laugh:

[red.]

Brilliant episode, just so funny with all that was said and done :laugh: (Y)

Radish™

Haha, that was great.

[MikeChipshop Member]

Did anyone else notice a distinct lack of James May... i mean he was there during the studio shot bits but that was all really.

Maybe that was the reason the beeb put 'James May on the moon' on beforehand?

I shall be writing a stern letter the BBC this afternoon... *snort*

:p

[red.]

Looks like i quoted the wrong post. I meant the Ross Kemp bit. And yeah, i did notice that James May wasn't in it too much.

[crazzy88ss]

wasn't a very impressive episode :/

[san.W10]

boring ep.

the airport vehicle race was really boring.

they should not do that challenge again, it has been done so many times already. :sleep:

[+jamesyfx Subscriber²]

I thought it was a great episode. Besides, the previous episodes had the entire episode pretty much having them building their own car and James May having a Caravan Balloon thing - it's about time they had a more varied episode.

Besides, the producer stated they're gonna tone down those huge challenges eventually.

Shame the HD broadcast was abut 2 hours late though... Stupid BBC.

[.Kompressor]

great one....

[crazzy88ss]

the airport vehicle race was really boring.

I actually liked that one for once.

[richardsim7]

I loved Clarkson's review :laugh:

[MikeChipshop Member]

Also the airport vehicle race.... a bit of a rip off of a certain chocolate companies ad...

[san.W10]

Not Happy With This Season So Far? Read Andy’s Response

There’s a rather lengthy thread on our forums where some people are saying that they’ve been unhappy with this season for a variety of reasons, but mostly because it wasn’t car related enough.

Andy Wilman, the executive producer of Top Gear and the fourth man behind the show, has responded to those types of concerns in a very well written blog post today. If you’re one of those people who feel Top Gear has gone in the wrong direction, then I strongly advise you to read it and then watch next week’s Bolivia special.

blog link/- http://transmission.blogs.topgear.com/2009...-where-were-at/

-----------------

Behind The Scenes With Jenson Button

http://www.topgear.com/uk/videos/new-serie...s-jenson-button

[MR_Candyman]

nobody but me seen ep 5 yet?

[what]

Yeah I saw it, was pretty lame to be honest.

[Remysaus]

Nothing special, had it's moments though :) I lol'd hard when James May's 'art' was on fire. :laugh:

[Sethos]

I'm honestly not looking forward to Top Gear each week any more. Despite being a massive fun, the predictable nature of the show has got to me now, after a few years. All the joke rehashes are just mind-numbingly annoying. "Oh it's on fire" yes, "haha" that is still funny after that many years - Oh you broke something? Gee, marvellous and you make a hash of things on purpose? How very innovative.

I remember Top Gear in the golden days, they actually managed to make it look like they were trying hard yet failing; that was fun! Now they aren't even bothering and it's like they are practically reading the script as they set fire to things, spray themselves in the face with air-fresheners and ruining every other thing they touch.

[HawkMan]

I'm honestly not looking forward to Top Gear each week any more. Despite being a massive fun, the predictable nature of the show has got to me now, after a few years. All the joke rehashes are just mind-numbingly annoying. "Oh it's on fire" yes, "haha" that is still funny after that many years - Oh you broke something? Gee, marvellous and you make a hash of things on purpose? How very innovative.

I remember Top Gear in the golden days, they actually managed to make it look like they were trying hard yet failing; that was fun! Now they aren't even bothering and it's like they are practically reading the script as they set fire to things, spray themselves in the face with air-fresheners and ruining every other thing they touch.

I just wish they'd take their projects more seriously and not intentionally make it crap. like their electric car, wich with the base they had could have been awesome. or their latest art car.

[Sethos]

I just wish they'd take their projects more seriously and not intentionally make it crap. like their electric car, wich with the base they had could have been awesome. or their latest art car.

Definitely - I mean, of course you expect them to fail in some aspects but I want them to give it their best and actually want to do a proper job, then all the hilarious stuff should come naturally because something is bound to go wrong all on its own without them planning every joke, every fire and how the entire project is bound to "fail" from the very start.

[Vice]

It was alrite. I agree with the posters above me the shows gotten a little to rehearsed. They need to try letting things happen organically.

[crazzy88ss]

This show was utter crap.

And I hate how they put in 5% effort into their project. They come up with some pretty good ideas and then screw it up on purpose. Ugh. I want them to try things like driving to the north pole, or driving across an African country again. REAL things that nobody's done before. THOSE are what make top gear truly epic.

[what]

Yeah, Sunday's show was terrible. Why **** something up on purpose when you have something brilliant? Like May's sculpture. I don't want to bring the license fee into any of this, but they really are wasting it on destroying perfectly decent things.

The Bolivia special this week should be brilliant though. If it isn't, I'll be severely disappointed, and the production team will have a lot to answer for.