Speed of managing files Windows 7 vs Vista vs XP


Speed of managin files. Windows 7 vs Vista vs XP  

90 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think Windows 7 manages files (copy, paste...) as slow than in Vista?

    • Yes. 7 and Vista manage files identically
      14
    • Yes. XP manages files faster than Vista/7
      23
    • No. 7 manages files faster than Vista
      53


Recommended Posts

I have tested Windows 7 RTM during 2 months, and I think Windows 7 manages files (copy, paste, cut...) same than in Vista. I don't see any improve in performance. Also the GUI is a bit slow compared with XP.

What do you think, 7 has improved or is like Vista?

XP sucks all system resources during the copy, so it may appear faster but it's bad from a multitasking perspective.

Vista/7 preserves the responsiveness of the whole system and also the copy process is fully transactional (Transactional-NTFS), resulting more reliable than XP's one

Edited by franzon

Windows 7 Professional x64 creates backups on my system in 15 minuters, wheras in Vista it took twice as long.

To restore, Windows 7 Pro x64 does it twice as quick.

These are all using Norton Ghost 14.

For me XP is faster not in performance, but in workflow. The biggest issue I have with managing files in Windows 7 is lack of information on free disk space in the folders. I have to go up to My Computer to see how much free space I freed up instead of looking down at the status bar. That just ****es me off more than anything.

XP sucks all system resources during the copy, so it may appear faster but it's bad from a multitasking perspective.

Vista/7 preserves the responsiveness of the whole system and also the copy process is fully transactional (Transactional-NTFS), resulting more reliable than XP's one

Vista and 7 both cause huge system instabilities when copying large amounts of data (10GB+), takes 2-3 times longer than XP, and generally will lock up if you click inside the copy window at anytime during the process.

I never had these problems on XP (SP2 / SP3)

Personally I don't even notice a difference. The one thing I hate is that Windows 7 likes to fully shut down a hdd when it hasn't been in use, so when I go to access it, it takes a while for it to warm up and spin before it accesses. Windows XP seems to have the hdd constantly going or something of that matter, so I never had a noticeable "warm up" lag.

You probably won't notice any differences between different versions of Windows, but they all suck. I still think that file management could be improved, especially by introducing queuing. For example, if I copy and paste two large files separately into another partition or usb drive, both will begin transferring at the same time. This not only takes longer, but tends to defragment the file. Plus, Windows does certain things like calculating time, which usually adds some time to the transfer. A great program that I have been using for months now is Teracopy, which basically sets itself as the default file management program.

Personally I don't even notice a difference. The one thing I hate is that Windows 7 likes to fully shut down a hdd when it hasn't been in use, so when I go to access it, it takes a while for it to warm up and spin before it accesses. Windows XP seems to have the hdd constantly going or something of that matter, so I never had a noticeable "warm up" lag.

You can change that in the Power Plan advanced settings but it parks the heads so it prolongs the life of the drive (or so I read at TechNet). It also gives it a rest and conserves power.

Vista and 7 both cause huge system instabilities when copying large amounts of data (10GB+), takes 2-3 times longer than XP, and generally will lock up if you click inside the copy window at anytime during the process.

I never had these problems on XP (SP2 / SP3)

I never had these problems on Vista. Your problems are caused by poorly-written antivirus software or 3rd-party ide/sata drivers

I don't use the recycle bin but I just copy and pasted 5 image files all at least 2MB onto my desktop and that was instant. Deleting them was also instant. No dialog. I don't have transfer issues, I can click in the copy dialog as much as I want.

This is on my Studio XPS 1340 with a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo with 4GB RAM, not a supercomputer by any means.

Vista and 7 both cause huge system instabilities when copying large amounts of data (10GB+), takes 2-3 times longer than XP, and generally will lock up if you click inside the copy window at anytime during the process.

I never had these problems on XP (SP2 / SP3)

I never had these issues on any system running Windows Vista (RTM, SP1, SP2) or Windows 7. File copies have always been quick, and responsiveness of Windows Explorer has been perfectly fine.

It is about the same for me, but then I don't use the default windows file copier. I wouldn't be - at all -surprised if explorer on 7/Vista is slower.

What is different though is that on the same specs, with *fetch features disabled (no cheating), XP manages loading applications faster than 7.

i use Directory Opus ($120 file manager, no i did not buy it) and it copies files quicker than any version of Explorer, in my experience.

i trust it to large copy jobs, as it gives more options during operations (like "Yes to rename all new files") and it never cancels halfway thru over something stupid like bad permissions or lack of disk space.

i do agree about the progress bars. deleting one file should not spawn a 2 second progress window.

XP sucks all system resources during the copy, so it may appear faster but it's bad from a multitasking perspective.

Vista/7 preserves the responsiveness of the whole system and also the copy process is fully transactional (Transactional-NTFS), resulting more reliable than XP's one.

Unfortunately your advice will fall on deaf ears - it is a lot easier to complain that diagnose problems or accept that things are done differently on Windows Vista and 7.

Someone noted instability - there are reasons for instability and 9/10 they have nothing to do with Microsoft.

1 gig copied in seconds. I don't know what you are comparing to, but if you are using a 5400RPM HDD and comparing it to a 7200RPM HDD then there is no comparison. Same goes for Laptops to desktops and old Hardware to new hardware.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!