Why did MS change the Control Panel icon on desktop?


Recommended Posts

Isn't it why its there? I guess some people care more about staring at a wallpaper than using their computer

Hmmm. Maybe they just don't see their desktop? I usually have 3-5 opened windows in different sides of screen, so it would be very uncomfortable to minimise them just to launch some app.

Am I the only one who doesn't actually use windows in Windows? I run all of my apps full screen, always have. So I never see the desktop unless everything is closed. Of course I don't have a giant monitor that takes up my entire wall running at 4000x8000 or some crazy resolution either. :laugh:

Am I the only one who doesn't actually use windows in Windows? I run all of my apps full screen, always have. So I never see the desktop unless everything is closed. Of course I don't have a giant monitor that takes up my entire wall running at 4000x8000 or some crazy resolution either. :laugh:

I find working in 1680x1050 full-screen uncomfortable, too mush of head movements :)

I agree but I only have the essentials that I like displayed.

Do you use Control Panel that much that you need a shortcut on desktop?

Also, get rid of the arrow on the firefox icon, looks nasty.

Isn't it why its there? I guess some people care more about staring at a wallpaper than using their computer

Generally clicking start then the program is much quicker than going back to the desktop (unless you have just booted your pc/have not windows open)... i only use the desktop for temporarily storing "unsorted files" saved from the internet or stuff I'm working on - which I then tidy up every few days, on and I let the recycle bin live their as again its "file tidying". This way it lets me remember what I'm working on and what needs putting in its place.

Anything I need to access a lot goes in the task bar. Anything I only occasionally want is good enough in start... especially with quick search finding any program in a few letters - in fact the more you use it the quicker it becomes, I've got so used to it over the last few months I know I can type in two letters combinations and hit enter and the program I want opens.

I agree but I only have the essentials that I like displayed.

1. The Control Panel's an essential? Do you really change system settings that often?

2. Just a tip: If you place your icons on the sides of the screen rather than the center, you can access them while you have windows open.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!