What Windows 7 SP1 or Internet Explorer 9 should have?


Recommended Posts

I agree that IE9 should be based on WebKit, MS develops Trident too slowly to compete with other browser engines. It should get download manager too.

I believe Microsoft is hard at work on their next generation rendering engine, which I imagine will be in IE9, so I would be shocked if they went to something else... Hopefully it will be good. They are working to be more standards compliant, so that's definitely a step in the right direction.

First: I think windows 7 should warn the user that there hardware is to old and that they should upgrage for better performance...This way it will stop the complainers from complaining about speed and file transfers issues. It's not always the hardware, it could actually be the OS or just the user causing the issues.

Second: I would like a feature that would make it easy to be able to move the icons in the task bar towards the center of the task bar.

third: IE just needs improvement in loading pages more fast and smoothly and render pages better

Windows experience index?

First: I think windows 7 should warn the user that there hardware is to old and that they should upgrage for better performance...This way it will stop the complainers from complaining about speed and file transfers issues. It's not always the hardware, it could actually be the OS or just the user causing the issues.

Second: I would like a feature that would make it easy to be able to move the icons in the task bar towards the center of the task bar.

third: IE just needs improvement in loading pages more fast and smoothly and render pages better

then people are going to complain ,that Microsoft are bullying them to upgrade , MS can't win

1. PLEASE! please bring back the details bar, I cant stand that they removed it in 7. Without the details bar there is no way that one can filter the files in windows explorer. This is the only thing preventing me from switching to windows 7, I cannot use 7 without this feature!

2. Bring back auto arrange & align to grid! What made them remove these things in the first place?

3. What happened to advanced edit in WMP 12? It was one of the best features in WMP, why remove something that worked perfectly? All I can say is WMP has gone all down hill from WMP 10, which was the last good version!

1. PLEASE! please bring back the details bar, I cant stand that they removed it in 7. Without the details bar there is no way that one can filter the files in windows explorer. This is the only thing preventing me from switching to windows 7, I cannot use 7 without this feature!

2. Bring back auto arrange & align to grid! What made them remove these things in the first place?

3. What happened to advanced edit in WMP 12? It was one of the best features in WMP, why remove something that worked perfectly? All I can say is WMP has gone all down hill from WMP 10, which was the last good version!

I agree, add one more thing to do the list, the minimise WMP 12 to task bar and keep it above other documents. I used to love watching video clips or cartoons in the little preview screen while I did work. It made the time fly by. :(

I agree, add one more thing to do the list, the minimise WMP 12 to task bar and keep it above other documents. I used to love watching video clips or cartoons in the little preview screen while I did work. It made the time fly by. :(

I agree 100% with that, MS should bring back the preview screen or atleast enble us to pin the WMP thumbnail on the taskbar!

I much prefer version numbers, rather than the year. Just about everything Microsoft is now named by the version number rather than the year (with the exception of Office, Visual Studio and possibly some more(?)) - Windows 7, Expression Suite 3, Zune 4.0... they should call the next Office "Office 14" and the next Visual Studio "Visual Studio 10" or whatever, to be consistent.

you are absolutely correct. after the blaster and sasser virus' microsoft was forced to redouble it's efforts on security. What was released i would have actually called a free copy of Windows 2004. As necessary as it was it took too many resources from Longhorn. I still think the original vision for longhorn is far better than Vista or 7

Ya, I've read a few interviews over the past few years with MS staff who say that the work done on XP for SP2 was about the same as a new OS release took in the past and your right, it did pull a lot of resources off Vista which is ultimately a major reason it was delayed again and again.

I agree, add one more thing to do the list, the minimise WMP 12 to task bar and keep it above other documents. I used to love watching video clips or cartoons in the little preview screen while I did work. It made the time fly by. :(
I agree 100% with that, MS should bring back the preview screen or atleast enble us to pin the WMP thumbnail on the taskbar!

What you describe/want is already possible in WMP12. It's called the Now Playing mode. Just enable the option "Always on top".

Windows 7 SP1 should (at the latest) fix the stuttering windows animations. And the stuttering "busy" mouse cursor.

I agree and also get tired of ctrl-alt-delete method to try and unstop these hangs on programs, and often times this doesn't work to stop the program from hanging. Not sure what the deal is with this and windows 7 but I'm glad to see it does happen with other people.

2) Smarter system, period. I am not impressed Windows 7 still can NOT do this. :|

Whatever is slowing down the computer, making the computer slow there should be a 'Doctor' in Taskbar notification area WHAT is causing it - File name or process name. And see what solutions are available.

If it's because computer needs to be defragmented. It should tell you that. Or if IE has a bug, tell you that...

I snipped a few windows down there to show the new system troubleshooter. MS hopes that more users will end up using that when their computer is slowing down instead of calling up tech support. Anyway, it's pretty much just a wizard and it runs through telling you what might be slowing down your computer.

It's a little hard to get to right now, so maybe they could simplify it. But under the System and Security category, click Find and Fix Problems, and at the bottom: Check for Performance Issues

20pd21g.jpg

post-152094-1257701261_thumb.jpg

post-152094-1257701266.jpg

post-152094-1257701270.jpg

post-152094-1257701277.jpg

Edited by Trong
Make it easier to select multiple backgrounds. The current checkbox is too small and a simple click too far to one side means the current selections are lost. You have to cancel and start checking the images again.

Ctrl + Click?

Or Shift + Click if you wanna select part of or an entire row?

I agree that IE9 should be based on WebKit, MS develops Trident too slowly to compete with other browser engines. It should get download manager too.

I actually hate how Webkit renders things; text often doesn't look quite "right" to me. Its odd I know, but true. Smoothscrolling in the other non-IE browsers always felt wrong to me too (though Opera 10 does it pretty nicely from what I remember). We already have a pile of browsers all using Webkit and copying each other; I like IE having something unique about it and having some choice.

I'll agree with the extensions and download manager, but only if the DLM is done right (like Opera's for example); Firefox has an abysmal DLM in my opinion.

Three small things I want in IE9 is something like Opera's Speed Dial, spell checking, and right-click context "Go to" command for highlighted text. These three things are the only reason I keep IE7Pro installed with IE8 (and IE7Pro's EasyHomepage recently stopped working for me, so I had to handcode a homepage with hard-coded links... >.< Not that it was hard, just a PITA.).

IE 9.0 sounds fine.

They wouldn't get rid of the Trident engine as it would **** off corporate customers who have Intranet sites based on IE. The WebKit plug-in for IE (from Google) isn't very stable and actually slowed my IE down and whenever I closed a tab it would crash, so I uninstalled it and now I don't suffer from these problems.

I for one would like some performance improvements in IE 9.

For Windows 7, SP1 should just be a collection of bug fixes and nothing else. Just what a Service Pack should be.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      521
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!