What Windows 7 SP1 or Internet Explorer 9 should have?


Recommended Posts

I agree that IE9 should be based on WebKit, MS develops Trident too slowly to compete with other browser engines. It should get download manager too.

I believe Microsoft is hard at work on their next generation rendering engine, which I imagine will be in IE9, so I would be shocked if they went to something else... Hopefully it will be good. They are working to be more standards compliant, so that's definitely a step in the right direction.

First: I think windows 7 should warn the user that there hardware is to old and that they should upgrage for better performance...This way it will stop the complainers from complaining about speed and file transfers issues. It's not always the hardware, it could actually be the OS or just the user causing the issues.

Second: I would like a feature that would make it easy to be able to move the icons in the task bar towards the center of the task bar.

third: IE just needs improvement in loading pages more fast and smoothly and render pages better

Windows experience index?

First: I think windows 7 should warn the user that there hardware is to old and that they should upgrage for better performance...This way it will stop the complainers from complaining about speed and file transfers issues. It's not always the hardware, it could actually be the OS or just the user causing the issues.

Second: I would like a feature that would make it easy to be able to move the icons in the task bar towards the center of the task bar.

third: IE just needs improvement in loading pages more fast and smoothly and render pages better

then people are going to complain ,that Microsoft are bullying them to upgrade , MS can't win

1. PLEASE! please bring back the details bar, I cant stand that they removed it in 7. Without the details bar there is no way that one can filter the files in windows explorer. This is the only thing preventing me from switching to windows 7, I cannot use 7 without this feature!

2. Bring back auto arrange & align to grid! What made them remove these things in the first place?

3. What happened to advanced edit in WMP 12? It was one of the best features in WMP, why remove something that worked perfectly? All I can say is WMP has gone all down hill from WMP 10, which was the last good version!

1. PLEASE! please bring back the details bar, I cant stand that they removed it in 7. Without the details bar there is no way that one can filter the files in windows explorer. This is the only thing preventing me from switching to windows 7, I cannot use 7 without this feature!

2. Bring back auto arrange & align to grid! What made them remove these things in the first place?

3. What happened to advanced edit in WMP 12? It was one of the best features in WMP, why remove something that worked perfectly? All I can say is WMP has gone all down hill from WMP 10, which was the last good version!

I agree, add one more thing to do the list, the minimise WMP 12 to task bar and keep it above other documents. I used to love watching video clips or cartoons in the little preview screen while I did work. It made the time fly by. :(

I agree, add one more thing to do the list, the minimise WMP 12 to task bar and keep it above other documents. I used to love watching video clips or cartoons in the little preview screen while I did work. It made the time fly by. :(

I agree 100% with that, MS should bring back the preview screen or atleast enble us to pin the WMP thumbnail on the taskbar!

I much prefer version numbers, rather than the year. Just about everything Microsoft is now named by the version number rather than the year (with the exception of Office, Visual Studio and possibly some more(?)) - Windows 7, Expression Suite 3, Zune 4.0... they should call the next Office "Office 14" and the next Visual Studio "Visual Studio 10" or whatever, to be consistent.

you are absolutely correct. after the blaster and sasser virus' microsoft was forced to redouble it's efforts on security. What was released i would have actually called a free copy of Windows 2004. As necessary as it was it took too many resources from Longhorn. I still think the original vision for longhorn is far better than Vista or 7

Ya, I've read a few interviews over the past few years with MS staff who say that the work done on XP for SP2 was about the same as a new OS release took in the past and your right, it did pull a lot of resources off Vista which is ultimately a major reason it was delayed again and again.

I agree, add one more thing to do the list, the minimise WMP 12 to task bar and keep it above other documents. I used to love watching video clips or cartoons in the little preview screen while I did work. It made the time fly by. :(
I agree 100% with that, MS should bring back the preview screen or atleast enble us to pin the WMP thumbnail on the taskbar!

What you describe/want is already possible in WMP12. It's called the Now Playing mode. Just enable the option "Always on top".

Windows 7 SP1 should (at the latest) fix the stuttering windows animations. And the stuttering "busy" mouse cursor.

I agree and also get tired of ctrl-alt-delete method to try and unstop these hangs on programs, and often times this doesn't work to stop the program from hanging. Not sure what the deal is with this and windows 7 but I'm glad to see it does happen with other people.

2) Smarter system, period. I am not impressed Windows 7 still can NOT do this. :|

Whatever is slowing down the computer, making the computer slow there should be a 'Doctor' in Taskbar notification area WHAT is causing it - File name or process name. And see what solutions are available.

If it's because computer needs to be defragmented. It should tell you that. Or if IE has a bug, tell you that...

I snipped a few windows down there to show the new system troubleshooter. MS hopes that more users will end up using that when their computer is slowing down instead of calling up tech support. Anyway, it's pretty much just a wizard and it runs through telling you what might be slowing down your computer.

It's a little hard to get to right now, so maybe they could simplify it. But under the System and Security category, click Find and Fix Problems, and at the bottom: Check for Performance Issues

20pd21g.jpg

post-152094-1257701261_thumb.jpg

post-152094-1257701266.jpg

post-152094-1257701270.jpg

post-152094-1257701277.jpg

Edited by Trong
Make it easier to select multiple backgrounds. The current checkbox is too small and a simple click too far to one side means the current selections are lost. You have to cancel and start checking the images again.

Ctrl + Click?

Or Shift + Click if you wanna select part of or an entire row?

I agree that IE9 should be based on WebKit, MS develops Trident too slowly to compete with other browser engines. It should get download manager too.

I actually hate how Webkit renders things; text often doesn't look quite "right" to me. Its odd I know, but true. Smoothscrolling in the other non-IE browsers always felt wrong to me too (though Opera 10 does it pretty nicely from what I remember). We already have a pile of browsers all using Webkit and copying each other; I like IE having something unique about it and having some choice.

I'll agree with the extensions and download manager, but only if the DLM is done right (like Opera's for example); Firefox has an abysmal DLM in my opinion.

Three small things I want in IE9 is something like Opera's Speed Dial, spell checking, and right-click context "Go to" command for highlighted text. These three things are the only reason I keep IE7Pro installed with IE8 (and IE7Pro's EasyHomepage recently stopped working for me, so I had to handcode a homepage with hard-coded links... >.< Not that it was hard, just a PITA.).

IE 9.0 sounds fine.

They wouldn't get rid of the Trident engine as it would **** off corporate customers who have Intranet sites based on IE. The WebKit plug-in for IE (from Google) isn't very stable and actually slowed my IE down and whenever I closed a tab it would crash, so I uninstalled it and now I don't suffer from these problems.

I for one would like some performance improvements in IE 9.

For Windows 7, SP1 should just be a collection of bug fixes and nothing else. Just what a Service Pack should be.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!