Recommended Posts

Everyone should own and use a disk imaging utility. There are many good ones, including free options (http://www.thefreecountry.com/utilities/backupandimage.shtml). It is the safest, most secure method of providing a backup to which you can restore at any time (it should be used on a regular basis). If you just want to backup your registry, you can use ERUNT (free) or just use regedit and export the registry to a location of your choosing (though ERUNT is an outstanding utility).

Start > All Programs > Accessories > System Tools > System Restore

once there, it will show an option to create a Restore Point. this should force a manual restore point to be made.

Restore points are also automatically made when installing programs that use the Windows Installer (.msi)

Unfortunately, the built in System Restore is great - until you need it. It always seems to fail only when it's most needed. Okay, for some people System Restore always works but........... In my opinion, the options I mentioned above are by far your best bet(s).

Wow, I completely overlooked the System Restore option under System Tools. Thing is, I have also heard that it's not the best tool to use as it might fail you. It's funny that I searched for it before, but didn't see it there. My eyes are clearly failing me. :hmmm: I'm going to try +allan's solutions first and see if those do the job. If not, I'll just use System Restore.

Thank you +allan and Wuffy. I really appreciate all of your help. :happy:

There is only one problem with system restore and this has happened to me

Once when I tried to restore back to a point before I "accidentally" got rid of all of those annoying Acer custom programs on my laptop for WiFi, for Blue tooth, for power settings, every other little thing under the sun and other little things progs I am NEVER going to use like that weird one with the key icon. But later I realized that the standard windows ones were either not installed as OEM (probably because of conflicts) so I was left with nothing. Then when I tried to use system restore, it would sort of restore, restart the computer, then come up with an error message saying nothing had been restored. So nothing worked. In the end I just used the hidden recovery partition (THANKYOU ACER!!!!) and all was good.

So yeah, the real problem is that the Windows System restore is good in case you have INSTALLED something you later realized was a virus or something (that wasn't picked up by Nod32 or Norton) and THEN you can use the system restore. But what sucks is that it will never EVER restore personal files or documents. That's why the Mac Time Capsule was really good (until it broke 6 months later).

So like allan says, get a disk imaging utility and backup as much of your stuff regularly (like once every two months) r rewritable DVDs

(I wish they would hurry up with easily avaliableblu-ray writers)

Cheers

So yeah, the real problem is that the Windows System restore is good in case you have INSTALLED something you later realized was a virus or something (that wasn't picked up by Nod32 or Norton) and THEN you can use the system restore. But what sucks is that it will never EVER restore personal files or documents. So like allan says, get a disk imaging utility and backup as much of your stuff regularly (like once every two months) r rewritable DVDs

(I wish they would hurry up with easily avaliableblu-ray writers)

Cheers

That's why it's called system restore. Your personal files are not part of the system.

So yeah, the real problem is that the Windows System restore is good in case you have INSTALLED something you later realized was a virus or something (that wasn't picked up by Nod32 or Norton) and THEN you can use the system restore. But what sucks is that it will never EVER restore personal files or documents. That's why the Mac Time Capsule was really good (until it broke 6 months later).

I know Vista Business/Ultimate and 7 Professional/Ultimate have Previous Versions where you can restore your personal files.

personally i found system restore is utterly useless: whatever problem caused system failure on the first place is still there after restore, and you will run into it again later

i setup my system so i have one drive for OS and one drive for documents/musics/downloads/misc, and a portable hard drive dedicated to make OS drive images; so if something went haywire, i can always restore the entire OS hard drive image, instead just system files, and leave all my personal files alone

....a portable hard drive dedicated to make OS drive images; so if something went haywire,....

Yes, that's the same way that I've got mine setup--it's the best (only?) way...

An image of the OS drive/partition and a backup of the media/doc files.

I use both Ghost and Acronis to image the OS, depending on the system. And Retrospect for the media/docs.

Ntfsbackup is the built in back up manager that can save a systems state and data, but is just horrible to use.

I would strongly suggest in investing in Acronis True Image for your back up needs. I have the server enterprise running on all my servers at work and all the images are backed up nightly.

System restore is just crap...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!