xp doesn't see my 3gb of ram, hep me


Recommended Posts

here a screenshot

since your available memory is more than 2GB, yet photoshop sees less then i believe you will need to move to 64bit architecture as 2GB mem per app is the limit of x86(32bit) architecture.

since your available memory is more than 2GB, yet photoshop sees less then i believe you will need to move to 64bit architecture as 2GB mem per app is the limit of x86(32bit) architecture.

Actually 3.25Gb is the limit of x86 architecture, however, XP has a limit of 2Gb of memory per process.

I would still recommend moving to x64 architecture simply because that is the way computers are headed, not to mention you'll need it if you plan to upgrade to 4Gb or more memory.

Edited by neo158
Actually 3.25Gb is the limit of x86 architecture, I would still recommend moving to x64 architecture simply because that is the way computers are headed, not to mention you'll need it if you plan to upgrade to 4Gb or more memory.

yes actual limit of 32bit architecture is 2^32=4GB, but the OS sees only upto 3.25GB, but for a single app limit is 2GB (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778%28VS.85%29.aspx).

Actually 3.25Gb is the limit of x86 architecture, I would still recommend moving to x64 architecture simply because that is the way computers are headed, not to mention you'll need it if you plan to upgrade to 4Gb or more memory.

No, it is not. The virtual address spaces on 32-bit Windows are split half and half (2GB/2GB) between the application and the OS. To go beyond 2GB, the application has to manually map pages of memory in and out of the virtual address space, which means implementing your own memory manager. In 64-bit Windows it's 4GB/0GB for 32-bit apps, and 8TB/8TB for 64-bit apps.

Neither of them are "architectural" limits, they are Windows design limits.

32-bits = 4GB. If you have a 512MB video card, that has to fit in there. The OS can see all 4GB, but there's more than just your RAM that needs to use that address space. :)

hdhood's information about the 2GB partitioning is correct. There is information on how to configure your system to use 4GB tuning and large-address-aware applications here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb...28VS.85%29.aspx

It's not for the faint of heart, though.

yes actual limit of 32bit architecture is 2^32=4GB, but the OS sees only upto 3.25GB, but for a single app limit is 2GB (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778%28VS.85%29.aspx).

thank all of you !

but if i use the swicht /3GB in boot.ini , could have an advantage?

maybe i could dismount 1gb of ram , and keep only 2gb of ram

thank all of you !

but if i use the swicht /3GB in boot.ini , could have an advantage?

You could do that, yes. Assuming Photoshop supports it. The only issue is that it reduces the operating system's part of the address space to just 1GB, which is not that much on modern systems. You can always just try it and see how it goes. Did you look into if Photoshop has any memory mangement settings?

maybe i could dismount 1gb of ram , and keep only 2gb of ram

What would that accomplish other than giving the system 1GB less to work with? It's not like having the extra GB there hurts anything just because PS can't use it (because Adobe is poop).

You could do that, yes. Assuming Photoshop supports it. The only issue is that it reduces the operating system's part of the address space to just 1GB, which is not that much on modern systems. You can always just try it and see how it goes. Did you look into if Photoshop has any memory mangement settings?

thanks

yes photshop can see more then 2gb but it's the only program

What would that accomplish other than giving the system 1GB less to work with? It's not like having the extra GB there hurts anything just because PS can't use it (because Adobe is poop).

because i can't see a benefit ,a gain having 3gb of ram

Well, it could be used by another program running at the same time. The point is that it doesn't hurt and does no damage. Removing it won't do anything useful. It won't improve performance or anything.

exactly, it will be useful for OS.

since if you use 3gb virtual address space for app & 1Gb for OS, then with only 2GB physical memory OS will also share it, it will be a net loss for photoshop.

if even /3gb switch doesn't works, you can try photoshop CS4 that does some memory management. best you move to x64.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
    • I did test it a month or so back, but ... the results I expect to be on the first page are not there.
    • Neowin is saying these are good prices? Thats crazy. As others have said they are just ######. Time for big tech to bring down the prices for real not this fake crap.
    • The iFlyTek AINote 2 is among the thinnest E-Ink tablets. It has an EMR stylus, a built-in fingerprint reader, and plenty of built-in AI features. You had me until "and plenty of built-in AI features." That and any company that still does the iProduct naming trope is an immediate pass. It suggests the company isn't very imaginative or creative and is trying to piggyback off another company's success. Extremely lame. Also kind of expensive. Better choices at lower prices out there.
    • These are not "great" prices... just "less awful". Apparently "Those who forget the past are doomed to pay higher prices and think they've won."
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!