• 0

Can't install ANY OS!


Question

I'm stumped - pure and simple.

The third computer in our house just got retired since we got a new system for me, my wife got my old system, and her old system was to be donated to a local charity.

As of about 2 weeks ago the system had been running like a champ - no issues of any kind. System had been loaded with XP Home with SP3.

After I got my wifes new system up and running to her satisfaction with all old files restored I wiped the old hard drive using dban and took the OEM system restore DVD and let it run. Normal XP install follows with all the normal stuff (create and format partition, time zone, language etc). Final reboot occurs and when rebooting system hangs with the Windows logo and the progress bar. Tried several things to no success.

Had my XP Pro w/SP2 full retail version available since I put a full version of Windows 7 of my wifes computer so I reformatted and tried installing that - same result.

DL'd and burned an i386 Kubuntu 9.10 iso and tried installing that. Similar result - error said something about "no such device" but I would have to try reinstalling again to copy the error code.

I have tried 3 different hard drives and also ran Memtest on the RAM.

Somebody give me a suggestion on what I should try next?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/844558-cant-install-any-os/
Share on other sites

17 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Tried changing the data cable from the HDDs?

Maybe the SATA/IDE controller is ****ed.

Older computer i.e. pre-SATA. But yes, I've tried that too.

Mother board is a FIC VC37GV with an Intel 845GV chipset

Processor is a Celeron D

HDD is a Western Digital WD1200JB

CD/DVD is a NEC ND-2500A

  • 0

I had this with a brand new laptop that had never had anything installed. I did a "full" format rather than the "quick" format and that solved the issue.

I also had it with another hard drive that had been in use but suddenly went wrong. Linux would install fine but Windows wouldn't. I gave up and used another HD. If you have a spare HD knocking around you should try it, at least as a test.

  • 0
Unplug the power cord, then take the CMOS battery off, the memory out of its slots and unplug the HDD. Wait a few minutes then connect all back together.

Boot from an Ubuntu CD and wipe the entire HDD with the partition manager.

Tried a Ubuntu 9.04 LiveCD this time (maybe Kubuntu 9.10 was too new?). Didn't matter. When I tried running from the CD here's the message I got:

init: rc-default main process (2878) terminated with status 127

  • 0

UPDATE

Well, tried everything I can think of to this point.

- removed the CMOS battery to reset BIOS to factory defaults. FIC has no BIOS updated available anywhere that I could find for this board.

- ran Ubuntu LiveCD

- ran Disk Check to make sure it was a good burn

- ran full Memtest86 with no errors

- tried running the Live CD and go an error that it couldn't find a live file system

- tried installing from the Ubuntu CD and got the same rc-default error I listed in a previous post

- tried doing an Ubuntu install from USB to isolate if it was my CD drive causing the problem - same error as before so CD drive is eliminated.

- repeated the same procedures as above after trying another hard drive - same error so HDD is eliminated.

- repeated the same procedure as aabove after replacing the IDE cables - same error as before so cables are eliminated.

- tried installing XP Pro again. Everything seemed fine until the last reboot when the Windows logo and progress bar came up it froze the second pass of the progress bar animation - left it for hours and no progress. Hard reboot via power button and same thing.

Anybody got any ideas?

  • 0

What spare parts do you have laying around? Do you have an extra power supply? I had a problem with my PSU that required me to do a cold boot in order to get it to boot. It could also be the mother board. Check the capacitors to see if they are ruined (the tops should be flat or slightly indented). If you have a spare computer your can swap all the components aside from the suspect ones and find the faulty component that way.

  • 0
It could be related to video or RAM.

If you any spare parts you could try swapping them.

It's not the RAM - ran the full gamut Memtest 86 without error.

Also isn't the Video - tried both the onbaord intel graphics and the ATI PCI graphics and same errors.

I'm really thinking either the MBD or Proc is fried somehow.

  • 0

Have you tried a bare-minimum install environment?

  • Only one HDD as primary master and CD/DVD drive as primary slave, configured by jumper.
  • Only one RAM stick, in slot0.
  • No PCI cards.
  • No USB devices plugged in (my HP printer once tried to **** up the initial driver installation leading to a reboot chain)
  • On-board LAN cards, sound chip, modem disabled.

Also, you might want to investigate on what changed from the time it did work, and till the time it stopped working. :huh:

Omkar

  • 0
Quick thought is the mobo capacitors could have popped. Once the system heats up with the load of the OS, it could be locking.

A quick physical inspection could confirm.

No visible signs of any blown capacitors - probably would have shown up while running Memtest86 since that took about 30 minutes anyway.

  • 0

Still waiting for the new motherboard and CPU but figured I'd try something different. Since I had already upgraded the other 2 computers in the house to 64-bit Windows 7 or Windows 7/Kubuntu and had used full versions of Windows 7 Pro for each meant that I also had the 32-bit DVDs as well so I figured "Why Not?".

Dropped the DVD in, booted the machine, and waited for the install to hang just like every other Windows 98 SE, XP Home w/SP1, XP Pro, XP Pro w/SP2, Ubuntu 9.04, Kubuntu 9.10, Ubuntu 9.10 (CD), Ubuntu 9.10 (USB), install I had thus far attempted. To my utter astonishment Win 7 32-bit installed without missing a beat :huh:

After the required period of jumping for joy reality sank in. In theory you'd think "Problem Solved" - nope. I've already used the associated product key for my Windows 7/Kubuntu machine and it would not accept the key from a spare Windows 7 64-bit upgrade disk that came with the new computer.

So here's where I stand:

- I have a working install of 32-bit Windows 7

- I've already used the associated product key for my Windows 7/Kubuntu machine

- I have an available key from an unused Windows 7 64-bit upgrade

Anybody know of a legal solution to my dilemma? What do you think the chances are of MS letting me swap my 64-bit product key for a 32-bit product key?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If only Windows would have a toggle switch named "Get the latest updates as soon as possible" inside Windows Update settings... But nah, let's hide the new stuff inside a controlled feature rollout, even if the user is explicitly asking for the new stuff as soon as possible.
    • After watching the Apple event earlier this week it is quite the contrast. Apple is going back and tweaking the code to make things more efficient in many areas of MacOS. Windows is boosting your electric build to hide their issues.
    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!