Modern Warfare 2 wallhacks already released


Recommended Posts

It's been less than 48 hours since the PC release of Modern Warfare 2, and multiplayer has already been abused by script kiddies. Could this be an omen of things to come? Check out footage of the wallhacking below.

Fortunately, the people who developed the hack are asking for money in return; hence, hopefully this will slow the uptake until Infinity Ward can get a patch out.

?So how are those dedicated servers coming?

Source: http://gamerlimit.com/2009/11/modern-warfa...ready-released/

"We are taking away dedicated servers and offering IW Net to completely clamp down on and prevent cheatin.... ehhh.... Dedicated servers are bad".

And PC gamers think they're being cheated by IW :laugh:

It's your cheating PC-playing colleagues who are cheating you, ultimately.

No you're cheated by IW/Activision "PR Speak".

They tried to say how what they were doing would be the holy grail of cheat prevention, when all it really was was adding steam protection, something other games have had for years. Steam is a good anti-cheat system, but it's not invincible, it's superior when coupled with dedicated servers so you can pick servers with regulars you can trust, ability to votekick and servers with good admins who respond quickly to cheating claims that VAC hasn't yet caught.

Right now in matchmaking you're stuck with a cheat for the whole duration unless you quit.

Huh? There'll be hacks for the 360 without a doubt.

Nope.

Only cheating you'll see on PS3/360 will be through glitches, and glitches are easily patched.

You can't run unsigned code/applications on consoles so therefore there will be no wallhacks/aimbots.

Yeah i was talking to my friend about this last night, IW and its "IWNET will stop cheaters", now if you get a cheater in the game you cant even fecking kick them, i was going to buy this game for MP after playing some MW1 9v9 and actually preferring it to massive 20v20+ servers. But not now.

I know it's still early, but what exactly is the issue in this video? There's a guy killing other guys, looks like standard MP to me.

Wow! Did you really watch the video? His gun follows players while they're behind walls, immediately shooting their heads the moment they come into view. Also does such shots with a machine gun from an amazingly long range too!

Wow! Did you really watch the video? His gun follows players while they're behind walls, immediately shooting their heads the moment they come into view. Also does such shots with a machine gun from an amazingly long range too!

Probably because he watched it in such a tiny window you cant make out the boxes around enemies or that hes using an aimbot unless you click through or go fullscreen.

Wow! Did you really watch the video? His gun follows players while they're behind walls, immediately shooting their heads the moment they come into view. Also does such shots with a machine gun from an amazingly long range too!

I guess I skipped the first few seconds, I just saw him doing close range kills the first time.

snip

Nope.

Only cheating you'll see on PS3/360 will be through glitches, and glitches are easily patched.

You can't run unsigned code/applications on consoles so therefore there will be no wallhacks/aimbots.

Not all true - COD4 had some serious hacks on both ps3 and xbox 360 if I recall

Cant access youtube from where I am right now but it should be on youtube

also, AND **** *** IW

Not all true - COD4 had some serious hacks on both ps3 and xbox 360 if I recall

Cant access youtube from where I am right now but it should be on youtube

also, AND **** *** IW

That was because IW left the command console in the console versions and a glitch allowed access to it. MW2 doesn't even have a console any more, not even on the PC.

The cheats being used were merely commands in the game, such as noclip and other modifiers devs have access to, or historically players when they start games with command line modifiers.

There cannot be aimbots/wallhacks on consoles unless consoles can run unsigned code.

That was because IW left the command console in the console versions and a glitch allowed access to it. MW2 doesn't even have a console any more, not even on the PC.

The cheats being used were merely commands in the game, such as noclip and other modifiers devs have access to, or historically players when they start games with command line modifiers.

There cannot be aimbots/wallhacks on consoles unless consoles can run unsigned code.

Pretty sure I read that someone "hacked" the console back in - sounds like it was just disabled through a config or the like.

The hack he is using is a wall hack, it places boxes and lines towards other players showing information on were they are. The person playing can then get ready to shoot them before he can see them. As far as I can tell there is no aim bot been used there, just wall hacks

The hack he is using is a wall hack, it places boxes and lines towards other players showing information on were they are. The person playing can then get ready to shoot them before he can see them. As far as I can tell there is no aim bot been used there, just wall hacks

Hes headshotting people with HMGs from across the other side of map, im pretty sure it is an aimbot as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!