Modern Warfare 2 wallhacks already released


Recommended Posts

If you're talking to me, then you better be about to unleash links to those aimbots and wallhacks for my PS3/360 if you want to avoid embarrassment.

Cute, like I am going to post links that will surely put my account in jeopardy of being banned just to prove you a fool, then I would also be the fool.

To understand that there are hacks freely available for your precious console games you must first understand that your precious console gets hacked first to allow it to run whatever you want.

How truly embarrassing this must be for you...

And guess what guys, peeps are already working on cracking the IWNET crap, making it MP for free (coop already works, regular MP in a few days). :laugh: IW and Dildovision got owned.

Thank God in a few years PC gamers like you won't have a game to play with

Thank God in a few years PC gamers like you won't have a game to play with

I do wonder if IW/Activision will give those who ask a refund.

Here is a direct quote from IW - "Cheat / Hack Free Games: The biggest benefit of using IWnet by far is the fact that you don't have to worry about joining a server full of aim-bots, wallhacks, or cheaters. Or relying on the server admin of the server to constantly be monitoring, banning, and policing it. Modern Warfare 2 on PC allows us to control the quality of the game much more than ever before as well as utilizing the VAC (Valve-Anti-Cheat) system to keep games clean of hackers and cheaters."

too bad, they ruin every game, and for what? Sad little creatures

We can place the blame on them and however true that is it's not going to change anything or do any good. The way to make it better is to give the community proper tools to deal with the cheaters. A top down approach to detecting hackers will never be as effective as people in the game seeing someone cheating and then banning him.

Thank God in a few years PC gamers like you won't have a game to play with

Hahahahahhaha

Piracy on consoles is even easier. Burn, pop the disk, yay. When they bury the PC, I'll just get me a console. Until then I expect better than some piece of sh*t console port on my PC. I'll be playing Dragon Age.

Cute, like I am going to post links that will surely put my account in jeopardy of being banned just to prove you a fool, then I would also be the fool.

To understand that there are hacks freely available for your precious console games you must first understand that your precious console gets hacked first to allow it to run whatever you want.

How truly embarrassing this must be for you...

:laugh:

Precccciouuuuus!

Come back to me when people are running 3rd party aimbots/wallhacks on consoles and not messing around with the console in COD4.

I guess the thought of playing on a Level Playing Field was too much to ask of anybody these days. I started out on Ghost Recon and yeah, I'll admit that I had played some games with MODS and such but NOT any of these AIMBOTS !

Am 53yrs old and I paid for this game to play with others on a "Level Playing Field" with no hacks, just user skill and have fun playing it with others, I dreamed of getting back into a clan with seasoned vet's like myself and having fun, BUT NO !

This game may not live up to my standards but somewhere out here, theres a game where ONE uses skill and NOT hacks to gloat about !

i hate idiots like this i doubt ill be buying it for pc now

my cd key is banned from playing cod4 because some idiot used a wall hack that every kill he got his name changed to that persons name

i dont know if i was hardware banned but 98% servers i cant play on

And PC gamers think they're being cheated by IW :laugh:

It's your cheating PC-playing colleagues who are cheating you, ultimately.

Not sure how you come up with the word "colleague" to describe cheaters.

Analogy: a football player that plays for the Dallas Cowboys doesn't consider a player for the Patriots a colleague, but rather a rival.

What do you mean "already". Since MW2 has the same engine as CoD4 the same hacks can be used with minor modification. Chances are is that there were hacks ready for use before the game was even released. The same is true for almost every game though, through various leaks of games and what not almost every game has hacks made for it before it even hits store shelves.

@scratch; if i recall correctly previous CoDs that use PB do not hardware ban, all global bans are based soley on your GUID which is based on you cd key.

I never understand the fun on wallhacking or aimbotting thing, wouldn't it get boring when you have no one to challenge you because, hence the superpowers of your hacks.. :huh: . I would understand when you using it on a SP campaign where it might be part that you can't complete or whatever even though that still takes away the point of the game being challenging.

I never understand the fun on wallhacking or aimbotting thing, wouldn't it get boring when you have no one to challenge you because, hence the superpowers of your hacks.. :huh: . I would understand when you using it on a SP campaign where it might be part that you can't complete or whatever even though that still takes away the point of the game being challenging.

Part of the reason they do it is just to **** people off. There are so many people that take pleasure in that.

Cute, like I am going to post links that will surely put my account in jeopardy of being banned just to prove you a fool, then I would also be the fool.

To understand that there are hacks freely available for your precious console games you must first understand that your precious console gets hacked first to allow it to run whatever you want.

How truly embarrassing this must be for you...

Your the only one embarrassing yourself it's an internet forum, someone may have been wrong (although he's not) get over it it doesn't make them a fool.

Hahahahahhaha

Piracy on consoles is even easier. Burn, pop the disk, yay. When they bury the PC, I'll just get me a console. Until then I expect better than some piece of sh*t console port on my PC. I'll be playing Dragon Age.

In a way this is true. And thank god for Dragon Age lol.

Edited by stunts
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!