Well I have switched from MSE back to NOD32


Recommended Posts

Memory usage on MSE is a bit higher than when I used to use avast, but I haven't had any of the CPU usage issues you experienced, and my CPU is inferior to yours. Also, the thing that puts me off using NOD32 is that (apart from the fact its free VS not free) its detection rates haven't been overly wonderful, last time it was tested, it was only in the low 80% region compared to 94 or something like that for Kaspersky

The lowest machine I've installed MSE on is a Celery 1.4Ghz and 512MB of RAM. It did slow the machine down a bit, but it was still usable. Even with the slowdown, I'd still install it over AVG, Avira, and Avast. Why you ask?

AVG - LOL

Avira - Stupid Ad and sometimes has problems with false positives

Avast - Its actually ok, but I don't really understand the need for a new free key once per year. I get sick of trying to explain to people how to get a new key only to say eff it and go do it for them.

I'm running the current MSE Beta (1743) and so far, not alot has changed in MSE yet. They need to seriously improve the full scan time along with the CPU usage as Warwagon mentioned. Kaspersky used to be my AV of choice, but got tired of its stupid little quirks and the little problems it caused here and there with basic OS operation.

Yeah, I actually liked Avast for the fact that it's detection rates were good compared to AVG or Avira when I needed something removed off of my grandmother's computers, along with a few friends of the family. Picked up stuff that AVG missed. Not my favorite though simply because of how it looks and functions. From what I remember, the scanner imitated a "media player" even, which I found to be a bit questionable when all I want is a simple anti-virus for people that aren't the most computer literate. Makes my life easier in being able to demonstrate, educate, and saves me minutes on my cellphone even. :p

I didn't know there was a new beta version of MSE out though. Any notable changes that you're aware of?

I don't know about you mate, but I can easily say I have installed MSE on 18 computers and none of them are showing any signs of MSE hogging down the system. The lowest system i installed MSE on is a Pentium III 550mhz i think and 256MB, there was no slow down what so ever.

I've installed it on various systems, including ones similar to that low-specced machine, and I also experienced no slow-down at all. It's also very efficient and scores highly on virus-attacking tests etc.

The CPU usage is sometimes noticeable, but nothing out of the ordinary.

I'll just leave a quick tip to those who are using MSE within Windows 7:

If you usually connect to windows shares within your network (\\serverx\\whatever), do not run full scans.

Select custom instead and check the drives you want to scan. There's a bug that makes MSE scan previously accessed locations, even if they're not mapped to a drive.

last time it was tested, it was only in the low 80% region compared to 94 or something like that for Kaspersky

I don't know where you got that information, but all the known AV tests (av-comparatives.org, virus bulletin, malware research group...) show that Nod32 is ahead of Kaspersky and surpassed only by a few other engines in some specific tests (on-demand mainly). For the record, Kaspersky has been falling down the list since the beginning of this year in terms of performance, RAP tests, on-demand... etc.

No idea how anyone can dislike this program... it's using 40MB of RAM now... which is literally nothing on most computers anyways... and I have it on my Dad's old computer, no problems, never even notices he has it on 90% of the time.

I recommend this program to all my friends, not one has had a problem.

When it comes to free protection, I think MSE is the best I've come across. AVG Home use to be decent but is now very sluggish and the ads are annoying. All the free ones I think have ads or at least nag screens to upgrade to their pay-for editions.

What I want is an antivirus that responds when a virus is found, deletes the virus and then puts a big message on my screen that says something along the lines us: "Threat Eliminated! Your system is now 100% virus free!"

Seems like whenever a virus is found you can delete the file or put it in a virus vault...but there is never a definitive "you are no longer infected" message to give me a nice warm feeling. I'm always left feeling paranoid.

Because what if it missed something. It can tell you it eliminated that file, but there is no way to guarantee it didn't miss something else.

mse has not been too good for me as out of like 5 pcs only 1 works good with it and it was an older one yet on a faster one mse chugged along and slowed all down so i had to remove it and the speed is back.

I was just finishing my sisters laptop. I still have MSE installed on it. I was installing Office 2007 on it and MSE was taking up between 20 to 67% CPU during the install of Office 2007.

Does MSE use the same engine as OneCare?

I only ask because i thought that OneCare wasn't very good.

Forefront

I was just finishing my sisters laptop. I still have MSE installed on it. I was installing Office 2007 on it and MSE was taking up between 20 to 67% CPU during the install of Office 2007.

So it was doing its job, which would be scanning while something is installing?

This is Microsoft Security Essentials during the install of Office 2007 Service pack 2 on a customers laptop.

<snip>

fqjTuKvlFa_Shopped.jpg

Joking aside, you must have the worst luck. Are you using the same install as you used elsewhere? Is it the release version? Did you get it straight from Microsoft? Have you tried downloading and installing another downloaded copy?

Just a thought because out of the 80+ computers I've done this on, I've yet to see your results much less hear any complaints. :/

i always turn off MSE when i''m installing a game or s/w.

53r6gg.png

right now, I'm copying videos from handy cam. but i dont think MSE is scanning anything right now. 35MB @idle :D

recently when i tried to install HP printer drivers, the installation stalled at 60% (step 3/4) for more than 20mins., turning off MSE didnt help, i had to kill the install to & re-install the drivers.

btw, why is there so many svchost files open :/ , how many does MSE open?

fqjTuKvlFa_Shopped.jpg

Joking aside, you must have the worst luck. Are you using the same install as you used elsewhere? Is it the release version? Did you get it straight from Microsoft? Have you tried downloading and installing another downloaded copy?

Just a thought because out of the 80+ computers I've done this on, I've yet to see your results much less hear any complaints. :/

Funny thing is, its someones elses computer not my own. I got it from Microsoft, the release version and its a clean install of windows.

I've installed it on a bunch of computers ,never really been happy with the memory or CPU usage. As to the guy who installed it on his PII with 256 meg of ram. I would never install MSE on anything less than 512. Let alone a PII, they don't have much CPU usage to work with let alone having MSE take up 70% of it while installing an application. I just think its also a CPU hog while doing any kind of scanning. It's not like i'm trying ot hate it. I really wanted to be impressed.

Funny thing is, its someones elses computer not my own. I got it from Microsoft, the release version and its a clean install of windows.

I've installed it on a bunch of computers ,never really been happy with the memory or CPU usage. As to the guy who installed it on his PII with 256 meg of ram. I would never install MSE on anything less than 512. Let alone a PII, they don't have much CPU usage to work with let alone having MSE take up 70% of it while installing an application. I just think its also a CPU hog while doing any kind of scanning. It's not like i'm trying ot hate it. I really wanted to be impressed.

maybe XP is the problem!

MSE slows me down only when i open the download folder, where i have a lot of downloads

i always turn off MSE when i''m installing a game or s/w.

53r6gg.png

right now, I'm copying videos from handy cam. but i dont think MSE is scanning anything right now. 35MB @idle :D

recently when i tried to install HP printer drivers, the installation stalled at 60% (step 3/4) for more than 20mins., turning off MSE didnt help, i had to kill the install to & re-install the drivers.

btw, why is there so many svchost files open :/ , how many does MSE open?

I think that after Windows XP, Microsoft split services up into more svchosts, so that in the event that a service host crashed, it wouldn't take out so many other services.

I'm not sure what you're machines are getting hit with. I can't seem to find anything wrong with MSE.

I noticed you showing a pic of it chewing up over 55% of the CPU when install Office 2007 SP2. I'm installing CoD World at War and it seems to be choking up no CPU cycles at all. Maybe it is my quad core? I expected to see ~25% CPU usage from it (100% on a comparable single core machine)... Getting ~0% was a shocker.

I'll look again when patching up since that would be more similar to your case.

post-16763-1258955220_thumb.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!