PC Hardware Problem


Recommended Posts

Ok now this started a couple months ago. Back then it wasn't this bad like it is now. Then it just used to be subtle slowness. Now its worse. Whenever I try to install anything it takes 3-4 times longer than it should. If I try to unzip anything(includes self extracting exe's) it goes so painfully slow. In just general use of the PC it will pause for a few seconds or more. Internet browsing is a pain. I'll get full system pauses if I have more than 2 or 3 tabs open.

Now I've run a few apps to test a few things. First I ran Memtest (regular & +), HDTune and Western Digital Diagnostics and none of them found anything wrong. I know its a hardware problem because I experience similar problems in Linux(Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy).

One problem I really have is that I don't have any spare parts to test on my hardware so I can try to pinpoint what the troublemaker is. I also don't know anyone that would have any.

I did a small little test of my own where I selected a file approximately 270-290MB on both hard drives and copied them to another folder on their own respective drives. The IDE drive file copied in 10-15secs. The SATA drive file took over 10mins to copy(Prolly would have been more I hadn't stopped it). I don't know if that might give an indication as to where to start.

To make matters worse I just don't have the money to buy a new mobo/cpu/memory. I'm hoping someone here may be able to help me in some way figure this out. Oh and if you're looking for my system specs they're in my signature.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/845106-pc-hardware-problem/
Share on other sites

I believe I might have a 30GB IDE drive laying around here somewhere that I might be able to use for this experiment. I would rather not install on the 80GB in the system now because it has all my stuff on it right now. I'll give it a shot tomorrow.

In your Linux boot environment, post the results of:

sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sda

(assuming sda is the drive in question)

And compare it to the results using the other drive you have. I would be interested in seeing what that shows for drive throughput.

In your Linux boot environment, post the results of:

sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sda

(assuming sda is the drive in question)

And compare it to the results using the other drive you have. I would be interested in seeing what that shows for drive throughput.

Compare with the 80GB IDE drive? I'll give it a shot as soon as I can.

And just for your comparison purposes, here are the results for my mid-budget PC that is about a year and a half old.

mark@mark-core2:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sda
[sudo] password for mark: 

/dev/sda:
 Timing cached reads:   1676 MB in  2.00 seconds = 837.79 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  186 MB in  3.03 seconds =  61.48 MB/sec
mark@mark-core2:~$

The "buffered" reads are the ones we are after.

Well I ran what you wanted and here's my results:

SATA

/dev/sda:

Timing cached reads: 1752 MB in 2.00 seconds = 875.75 MB/sec

Timing buffered disk reads: 130 MB in 3.02 seconds = 42.99 MB/sec

IDE

/dev/sdb:

Timing cached reads: 1642 MB in 2.00 seconds = 820.42 MB/sec

Timing buffered disk reads: 146 MB in 3.03 seconds = 48.13 MB/sec

I was assuming that "sdb" was my 80GB drive.

Sorry for being late with this. Something had come up.

Not a problem.

I'm not seeing a large difference between the two. Now, hdparm is just a quick check from the start of the drive. There is a tool that takes a longer closer look: bonnie++

You can install it with a sudo apt-get install bonnie++. Run it from the terminal, same as the other command. It spits out a lot of numbers, so make your terminal window about twice as wide, so you get good formatting.

You can try running that and see if you get any differences?

But other than that, I would have to conclude that you have similar performance between the two drives in Linux.

EDIT: A little info on bonnie++

http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-hard-d...ware-howto.html

Ok I'm sorry but I'm doing something wrong here. I'm trying to type in the command similar to the hdparm one but I'm getting nowhere. This is what I'm trying to use: sudo bonnie++ -tT /dev/sda and I've also tried sudo bonnie++ -t /dev/sda. I'm obviously doing it wrong.

bonnie is not the same program as hdparm, so it doesn't accept the same parameters.

The link I sent shows you how to use it:

How do I use bonnie++?

Simply type bonnie++ or bonnie:

$ bonnie++

OR

$ bonnie

So you just need to type "bonnie" in your terminal.

And after that, you have about 10 minutes or more of testing, if I recall correctly. Go make a sandwich or something while it does it checks. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!