Petition 2 - To Infinity Ward


Recommended Posts

PC Gamers,

I?ve come to make a topic here because of a post made by one of your members on the FPSAdmin.com forums prior to the release of Modern Warfare 2 showing support for the game from your clan/members.

As we are very much aware Infinity Ward have yet to respond to the concerns and feedback of the PC Community about Modern Warfare 2. PC Gamers have come under a large amount of criticism for acting out with a petition in advance of the games release without knowing what it would be like.

Well now the game has been released and we do know what it is like. This is a call for anyone within the PC Community to show their support for a new petition entitled ?Modern Warfare 2 (PC) ? Post Release?. The idea behind the new petition is to show Infinity Ward (with a completely clean slate) that we do really still care about the issues and are providing them with the feedback that they need to do good by us.

The petition covers the need for:

- Support for an in-game console;

- Support for the ?/record? feature;

- Support for the lean feature;

- Support for auto-balancing;

- Support for multiple profiles;

- Support for better Graphics and FOV control;

- Support for actual ping readouts in ms (not graphs);

- Support for a tournament game type (like Promod);

Dedicated Server/IWNet specific:

- Support for mod tools and modded Dedicated Servers;

- Support for Punkbuster enabled Dedicated Servers;

- Support for Dedicated Server admins to choose player numbers (Max: 50);

- Support for PC gamers to choose if they wish to connect to an IWNet P2P server or a Dedicated Server (hosted by clans/individuals, etc)

Many PC Gamers are starting to give up on Infinity Ward ever making good of their damaging changes to the community. My response to that, and hopefully yours, is ?let?s give it one last shot?. Let?s unite as one PC Community!

The IW forums post for this is at http://www.infinityward.com/forum/viewtopi...24&t=174552

The petition is at: http://www.petitiononline.com/mw2pcpr/petition.html

Thanks,

CS[Ex]JustJack

[email protected]

www.celtsclan.com

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/845924-petition-2-to-infinity-ward/
Share on other sites

I would do it, however I'm sure people just see it as a waste of time. I really hate to be saying this but they just don't care about the PC platform any more.

As long as people buy the console copies, which is what they are more focused on anyway, then it will not effect (affect?) them anyway :(

Its the sad truth, but that's the way it is now :(

EDIT: And when I mean they, I mean IW, not the users :)

I would do it, however I'm sure people just see it as a waste of time. I really hate to be saying this but they just don't care about the PC platform any more.

Quite, 200k signatures in that last petition, as long as console gamers don't give a **** about 200 ms pings and bullets that bend like in the movie Wanted (hurray for ignorance). Nothing will happen.

On steam?

Anyway, your point?

People are still playing it, boycotting something is NOT getting it, full stop.

You can pirate games and add them to steam as 'non steam games' and I believe one of the pirated versions kept the steam component in-tact but I'm not aware of how that works with the online services thing. Point is people may boycott it and yet still download the pirated release and believe they are still boycotting it by not paying.

I wish the prestige version was available in the UK, I can't find any retailer with it and I would buy it in a second.

I would do it, however I'm sure people just see it as a waste of time. I really hate to be saying this but they just don't care about the PC platform any more.

As long as people buy the console copies, which is what they are more focused on anyway, then it will not effect (affect?) them anyway :(

Its the sad truth, but that's the way it is now :(

EDIT: And when I mean they, I mean IW, not the users :)

Not going to say some people don't see it as a waste of time but theres still a PC Community out there that cares about the game and still wants to try and get IW to turn their decisions around surrounding the PC version.

But you know... you take in the stride of trying to find those that do care.

I stopped reading at this.

"- Support for better Graphics and FOV control;"

As if they are obligated to your opinion to change the game. Changing the graphics is not something a game developer would change in a patch.

They've removed a fair amount of control of graphics settings and FOV control within the game - it's been taken a step backwards from COD4 and it's on DX9. We're not asking them to move it to a better graphics engine.

Quite, 200k signatures in that last petition, as long as console gamers don't give a **** about 200 ms pings and bullets that bend like in the movie Wanted (hurray for ignorance). Nothing will happen.

The petition was started prelaunch so it was almost immediately discredited because people hadn't seen the game. New petition and post launch the aim is to show IW that we've seen their game and these are the changes the PC Community would like.

On steam?

Anyway, your point?

People are still playing it, boycotting something is NOT getting it, full stop.

It's beyond boycotting now. Whether people purchased the game or not everyone on PC is part of the PC Community, this is about speaking as one community about the features and future of the game on PC.

My guess is this will fall on deaf ears.

Only if we let it.

Sorry, but I think this is stupid as well. If you didn't like the features, you shouldn't have bought the game. You can't buy a game and expect to make demands. They've already got your dollar, what do they care if you're angry?

I didn't buy the game. $60 for a feature ripped game, in comparison to their previous version mind you, with a short singleplayer campaign that leaves everyone in confusion and relying on wikis and such to actually figure out what the heck happened.

Honestly, it's probably better to compare this game with a hooker. Sure, she looks great, may have been great in the sack, but it wasn't going anywhere anyway, and you'll probably be left with major regret.

yeah people who bought the game and are like I don't like it change it please are stupid. I haven't bought the game and don't intend too and I'm more happy for it. It's not really difficult to make a mental decision to not buy something.

It's a game. If you don't like it dont play it. It is hardly a requirement for living to make sure Modern Warfare fixes/adds something you don't like.

Do something worthwhile. Even running around in your garden will reap more benefits to you than this petition.

As much as I'd love to support this petition, I don't see it changing anything. A company like Activision and Infinity Ward are in it for the money. If they don't see it as financially viable, they won't spend time and money to make the PC version better. To them, it's good enough already. And to us, it isn't (in terms of PC standards).

Meh, I'll just wait to see if any mates buy it on PC but it seems that most of them bought it on 360/PS3. I just want to play single player, I'm not a big fan of COD's multiplayer especially with that Punkbuster fiasco I suffered where it kicked me out constantly for some crappy API problem. Probs because I was using Win7 beta at the time but meh.

I would not sign this petition, i feel it went from "These are things we NEED" to "Here are some things we need, but while we are at it let's get greedy and throw in things we want" Get the necessities out of the way before you start asking for some other things, IW would look at a small petition of bare things before they look at a long list of huge features and graphical improvements.

I would sign it, if you didnt add all the extra crap. We just need the basics of multiplayer. not all the addons you're asking for.

How do you expect them to give us what we need for pc gaming, if you're making it pointless with the requests?

I would not sign this petition, i feel it went from "These are things we NEED" to "Here are some things we need, but while we are at it let's get greedy and throw in things we want" Get the necessities out of the way before you start asking for some other things, IW would look at a small petition of bare things before they look at a long list of huge features and graphical improvements.

The entire list is based of PC Community feedback on the Infinity Ward forums since the release of the game. Whether you see it as "extra crap" or not this is what the PC Community has asked for. If you don't support it then don't sign it but don't start to put the feedback of other gamers down, which is resonable, because you think its utter rubbish.

Response above pretty much covers both except the graphics part refers to better graphics control which has been downgraded since COD4. None of the requests aren't anything that we haven't had before.

The entire list is based of PC Community feedback on the Infinity Ward forums since the release of the game. Whether you see it as "extra crap" or not this is what the PC Community has asked for. If you don't support it then don't sign it but don't start to put the feedback of other gamers down, which is resonable, because you think its utter rubbish.

Feedback? This seems more like a list of things you think you're entitled to. PC gamers aren't a big of a market as they use to be. Take a look around and you'll notice that a generation has grew up on broadband and online gaming on consoles. PC owners are lucky to get the game these days! Let alone make a list of demands then expect developers to invest time in implementing them.

I'd say vote with your wallet but it won't make an ounce of difference in the CoD franchise.

Edited by Spookie
Feedback? This seems more like a list of things you think you're entitled to. PC gamers aren't a big of a market as they use to be. Take a look around and you'll notice that a generation has grew up on broadband and online gaming on consoles. PC owners are lucky to get the game these days! Let alone make a list of demands then expect developers to invest time in implementing them.

I'd say vote with your wallet but it won't make an ounce of difference in the CoD franchise.

everytime I hear somebody say that I lol and just think of WOW. while true that the overall the console market is bigger than the PC market, pc gamers shouldn't feel lucky they got any game and they should demand quality just like any good gamer will. If it wasn't for PC users, COD wouldn't exist. Games like cod4, wow, total war, etc show that you can make alot of money on the pc very easily if you just make a quality game. All of these games show that if you make a quality game and respect your fanbase like all of those developers do, the PC community will reward you.

too many developers release beta quailty as final products in pc and think oh we'll just patch it and then when it bombs wonder what happened. As all of this relates to MW2, the majority of pc gamers who did decide to actually boycott the game didn't ask for anything special or extra, they only asked for what had already been a staple of the series. Nobody said OMG you should have 256 players because MAG console will QQ, they just asked for the same multiplayer xp they got in the previous game.

IMO the effect of any boycott of the PC product was diminished when people bought the game and then thought activision would change it after they already had their money..i say -_- to those people. Anybody with a brain knows that IW did all of this for money and to charge pc users for content from this point forward. It had nothing to do with piracy, an easy multiplayer experience or nothing, just simply them wanting more money and I'm proud to say they won't get any of mine.

PC owners are lucky to get the game these days!

Thanks to publishers going for all the easy console gamer $$$ we'll be lucky to get a hardcore or realistic game suitable for adults on ANY platform again. MW2 is not an impressive game. It's a competently-made game, with big-budget production value, but it is a fairly generic, overhyped game when it comes to gameplay, innovation, level design, and story/characters. If you've played a CoD game before you might even feel the franchise has gone downhill even though the budget's gotten bigger.

Just like with movies and music, popularity doesn't equal quality. But games are on such tight margins they have no choice but to go for mass popularity, which means they have to dumb things down and make it cross-platform too. Those kinds of restrictions make it very difficult to make a good game. That's not even mentioning how played-out all the franchises and genres have gotten. This is like the sixth CoD game, isn't it!? I think they ran out of war movies and rejected Tom Clancy stories to rip off.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a couple to mention, and they still run great on Windows 11 Adobe Lightroom Version 2 Alcohol 120% CLZ Book, Comic, Game, Movie, & Music Collector (PC - No longer sold / Grandfathered in - now mobile apps/online only) DVDDecrypter ISO Buster Pro version 1.9.1 (Still supports HD-DVD too) Nero Burning Rom 8 (Only the burning software, no backup, media converter, etc)   OpenAL (Runtime) PowerDVD 12 Ultra SPTD (SCSI Pass through Direct Driver) UltraISO Windows Media Encoder 9 WinImage You can tell I still sport an optical drive    
    • Linux 7.1 arrives with an NTFS overhaul and major hardware performance boosts by Paul Hill The founder of the Linux kernel has just announced the availability of Linux 7.1. This is a stable version of the kernel that will now be tested by various Linux distributions before it is shipped to users through update managers. Some users, like those on Debian, for example, might not get it for a long time, if at all, while Fedora users can expect it in the near future. With Linux 7.1 out on time, the merge window for Linux 7.2 is now open, giving contributors the opportunity to send in major new features that have been waiting for the last two months. Torvalds warned that he is currently travelling and will be in another timezone, so timing for the merge window may be irregular due to timezone differences and limited internet access. Torvalds said that he has already fetched early pull requests to allow him to do some offline work, but the travel could still cause disruption. Right now, he is not planning to extend the release, but did consider it. He said he might later regret not extending, though. In terms of this last week of development for Linux 7.1, Torvalds said there were no major or alarming changes. This week consisted mostly of smaller driver updates to GPU, networking, and sound, networking fixes, trace tooling fixes, and misc minor fixes. The shortlog this week lists fixes for driver bugs, memory leaks, I/O and USB fixes, networking and RDMA fixes, DRM/graphics fixes, and tooling and verification improvements. Specific fixes include USB series heap-overflow and buffer overflow fixes, and multiple use-after-free, memory-leak, and refcount corrections across subsystems such as i2c, zram, gpio, and net. There are fixes for graphics drivers, including amdgpu, i915, and virtio, as well as hypervisor and virtualization tweaks affecting mshv, vmbus, and hyperv. According to Phoronix, anyone running Linux 7.1 should look out for the new NTFS driver, Intel FRED for improved performance on Panther Lake and future CPUs, faster graphics with Intel Arc Battlemage, and improvements for older AMD Radeon GPUs. If you are running Linux on your computer and everything is fine, then you don’t need to worry about updating to Linux 7.1 as a priority; just wait for it to be pushed to you. If you have tried Linux on hardware but it didn’t work properly, trying again with a distro that uses Linux 7.1 could cause Linux to work on your machine, thanks to the new hardware support.
    • you can also do this with this tool: PowerSettingsExplorer made by mbk1969 at 3dguru forum.. I found it by accident researching on modern standby and annoying quirks of it in 2022
    • AB Download Manager 1.9.1 by Razvan Serea AB Download Manager is an open-source, feature-rich download manager designed to accelerate downloads, organize files efficiently, and provide seamless control over downloads. With support for multiple connections, resume capability, and an intuitive interface, it enhances the downloading experience for users seeking speed and reliability. The software integrates with various browsers, enabling quick link grabbing and batch downloading. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP protocols, ensuring broad compatibility with different file sources. Users can schedule downloads, set speed limits, and categorize files automatically for better organization. AB Download Manager is lightweight yet powerful, making it a great alternative to proprietary download managers. Its open-source nature allows developers to contribute, customize, and improve the software as needed. Whether you're downloading large files, managing multiple downloads at once, or seeking an ad-free experience, this tool offers a practical and efficient solution. Key features of AB Download Manager: Multi-Connection Support – Accelerates downloads by splitting files into multiple segments. Resume Capability – Allows paused or interrupted downloads to be resumed without starting over. Batch Downloading – Supports downloading multiple files at once for improved efficiency. Browser Integration – Captures download links directly from browsers for seamless operation. HTTP, HTTPS, and FTP Support – Ensures compatibility with a wide range of file sources. Download Scheduling – Enables users to automate downloads at specific times. Speed Limiting – Lets users control bandwidth usage for optimized performance. File Categorization – Automatically organizes downloaded files into designated folders. User-Friendly Interface – Simple and intuitive design for easy navigation. Cross-Platform Compatibility – Works on multiple operating systems. Ad-Free Experience – No intrusive ads or tracking for a clean user experience. AB Download Manager 1.9.1 changelog: Added An option to customize notification sounds (#1259) Fixed Ongoing notification was laggy on Samsung One UI devices (#1269) Improved Updated Translations Minor UI/UX improvements Download: AB Download Manager 1.9.1 | Portable | ~80.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | Android Links: AB Download Manager Website | Github Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • watching him because of the Mr Klinton cat
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      139
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!