time travel.. something to think about..


Recommended Posts

hey somebody here talking about that airplane thing..

like u travel faster in time then others are or something..

i read it somewhere..

but i never understood the whole idea.

can somebody here make it into simpler words?

hey somebody here talking about that airplane thing..

like u travel faster in time then others are or something..

i read it somewhere..

but i never understood the whole idea.

can somebody here make it into simpler words?

Time is relative to speed.

So the faster you go, the slower time goes for you (although, you experience time the same.. time is going slower for you compared to people going.

We see this in everyday things, like GPS satelites which are rotating around the earth, need there clocks adjusting every 24hours as they become 0.5seconds out of sync with earth time.

I believe time travel forwards or backwards isn't possible, It think what could be possible is being able to go from one place to another through a wormhole or something. so someone from the UK could jump through something and end up in New York.

It would be cool IMO.

If time travel was possible, someone from future might have already traveled back and be living with us right now.

Yes but they wouldn't come back here, travelling in time is only theoretically possible if you jump between time lines, so we would know nothing about it, ever, even if people were time travelling all day every day.

Time is relative to speed.

So the faster you go, the slower time goes for you (although, you experience time the same.. time is going slower for you compared to people going.

We see this in everyday things, like GPS satelites which are rotating around the earth, need there clocks adjusting every 24hours as they become 0.5seconds out of sync with earth time.

this is weird..

what i read was that its slower for the person in another frame .. as in position..

if he is static that is.

or if u got 2 person.. its slower for the one further.. ur something..

:s

and its also relative to the gravity..

:s correct me please..

Yes but they wouldn't come back here, travelling in time is only theoretically possible if you jump between time lines, so we would know nothing about it, ever, even if people were time travelling all day every day.

Huh? I'm really lost. Somebody time-travels back to some time but does not arrives there??? Then whats the use?

I never understood this Schr?dinger's cat thing. I have read about it many times, but I just don't get it...

This make my brain feel really small:no:: .

I tend to favor String Theory myself...

String theorists believe in the existence of multiple or parallel universes. Assuming this theory holds true, time travel would take you to an alternate reality or universe. Whatever you do there will only affect that particular timeline, not yours. In essence, the Grandfather Paradox won't be an issue.

Huh? I'm really lost. Somebody time-travels back to some time but does not arrives there??? Then whats the use?

This make my brain feel really small :no: .

OK, put simply. Very, very small things cannot make decisions by themselves. If given a choice, very small things will act out all choices simultaneously. It's not until somebody looks for one of these choices that the very small thing will make one in the eye of the observer! The act of observing is the decider.

Hence, Schr?dinger's cat is both alive and dead in the box until you open it, and then it will be either one. You can't trick very small things to make their own decisions, that was proved in practice here with what is known as the "Double Slit experiment".

Put a pea in the narrow end of a funnel, and put lots of slits of cardboard at the other end and blow the pea through, you'd image it to travel between two slits of cardboard right? In quantum mechanics, it travels through them all at the same time. The difference between the pea and the "very small thing" is that due to it's size, the pea is manipulated by other forces such as gravity, how hard you blow and even the friction of the funnel, these things "observe" the pea and interact with it which is what makes the decision. The "very small thing" is so small that nothing really interacts with it, hence no force can help it choose what slots to travel between, so it travels through them all.

You might say it bears no relevance to real life as we only really interact with big things, but big things are made of bazillions of small things.

Relevance to Time Travel? Well, what happens to all of these other possibilities that the act of observing plucks one outcome from? Do they simply collapse when the choice is made? Do they carry on regardless totally separately to this time line?

Isn't the amount of power theoretically required for "time travel" to work like... All of the solar energy our Sun generates through it's entire lifetime and then some?...

Yes, apparently the amount of power needed to go back in time at the present, cannot be recreated on Earth.

One thing that bug me about time travel, is that if you move in time, but stay at the exact same place, aren't you going to end up in the middle of nowhere in space? I mean, planets, solar system and even galaxies are always in movement...

So time travel would be completely useless unless they find a way to control where you'll end up in space...

I was watching a pbs show a while back that theorised that if a time machine was invented in the future, people would only be able to go back in time as far as the first instant it was turned on. The machine would create a wormhole through two points in time. It's like making a tunnel through a mountain, nobody can go through it until both ends are connected. This would explain why there are no time travellers arriving currently.

OK, put simply. Very, very small things cannot make decisions by themselves. If given a choice, very small things will act out all choices simultaneously. It's not until somebody looks for one of these choices that the very small thing will make one in the eye of the observer! The act of observing is the decider.

Hence, Schr?dinger's cat is both alive and dead in the box until you open it, and then it will be either one. You can't trick very small things to make their own decisions, that was proved in practice here with what is known as the "Double Slit experiment".

Put a pea in the narrow end of a funnel, and put lots of slits of cardboard at the other end and blow the pea through, you'd image it to travel between two slits of cardboard right? In quantum mechanics, it travels through them all at the same time. The difference between the pea and the "very small thing" is that due to it's size, the pea is manipulated by other forces such as gravity, how hard you blow and even the friction of the funnel, these things "observe" the pea and interact with it which is what makes the decision. The "very small thing" is so small that nothing really interacts with it, hence no force can help it choose what slots to travel between, so it travels through them all.

You might say it bears no relevance to real life as we only really interact with big things, but big things are made of bazillions of small things.

Relevance to Time Travel? Well, what happens to all of these other possibilities that the act of observing plucks one outcome from? Do they simply collapse when the choice is made? Do they carry on regardless totally separately to this time line?

Thanks man! for the explanation.

I was watching a pbs show a while back that theorised that if a time machine was invented in the future, people would only be able to go back in time as far as the first instant it was turned on. The machine would create a wormhole through two points in time. It's like making a tunnel through a mountain, nobody can go through it until both ends are connected. This would explain why there are no time travellers arriving currently.

This sounds logical.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!