Windows 7 Slow Welcome Screen and Unresponsive Desktop


Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if a solution has been found before, as I've tried searching here and on Google and I've come up with nothing.

Anyway, here's my problem. I go to boot into Windows 7 and the boot is rather quick, up until the Welcome Screen. To give a rough estimate on times, once Windows 7 starts loading (the animated flag) until when the screen goes black (right before the Welcome Screen) takes about 12 seconds. Once the welcome screen starts going it takes almost another 10 seconds before it loads. Then when it finally reaches my desktop, the icons on my superbar are white file icons for several seconds then they change back, and my computer continues to be unresponsive for about another 10 seconds after that.

I have tried the usual, including disabling services and making sure nothing is running at startup. This has happened even on a fresh load.

Here are my two questions...

1. Am I achieving a normal boot time for my specs? I have seen several videos where the welcome screen is rather instant, unlike on my system.

2. Is anyone else experiencing a rather unresponsive desktop on boot?

I don't think that my system should have either of these problems, especially the unresponsive desktop for several seconds after boot. XP has neither of these problems, and I am usually able to boot in 15 seconds or so (from memory, I haven't used XP for a while now, but I do know it was much quicker than 7) and reach a usable desktop almost immediately. Other than that, Windows 7 flies on this machine.

Here are my specs if you can't see my signature.

Windows 7 x86 RTM (and x64; I've tried both, no difference)

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 2.66 GHz

Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR-800

BFG GeForce 9800 GT OC 512MB

ST380815AS 80GB SATA 7200RPM (Boot Drive)

Hitachi HDS721515PLA380 160GB SATA 7200RPM (Game/Backup Drive)

Fujitsu MHZ2080BH G2 80GB SATA 5400RPM (Backup Drive)

Thanks!

I wouldn't call it bad, but it's not normal either. Especially for a fresh (clean?) load.

Having those hdds though, that's going to be the trouble there for sure.

That's what I was thinking. It doesn't seem horrible by any means, but it's not exactly great either, and the unresponsive desktop is really frustrating.

Having all of them connected at one time, or are you referring to the hard drives themselves being slow? I know the one I am using for my boot drive came out of an HP that didn't have this issue with Vista (I know this is a different OS altogether, but I figured it was worth mentioning).

That's what I was thinking. It doesn't seem horrible by any means, but it's not exactly great either, and the unresponsive desktop is really frustrating.

Having all of them connected at one time, or are you referring to the hard drives themselves being slow? I know the one I am using for my boot drive came out of an HP that didn't have this issue with Vista (I know this is a different OS altogether, but I figured it was worth mentioning).

I have much worse specs than you and it hangs for a few seconds after entering the password. Really irritating. I convinced it is an issue with Windows itself because I have seen it happen across multiple setups.

I haven't seen it happen on any Windows 7 computer with good specs. We run it at work on Netbooks and yes, it can take 10-30 seconds to get to the desktop (depending if your profile has been cached or not), which I think is fair enough.

If your machine/s aren't up to scratch, then thats the cause usually...

I haven't seen it happen on any Windows 7 computer with good specs. We run it at work on Netbooks and yes, it can take 10-30 seconds to get to the desktop (depending if your profile has been cached or not), which I think is fair enough.

If your machine/s aren't up to scratch, then thats the cause usually...

What are the specs of these good machines? I would like to know for comparison. My machine is by far the best system of the market, but I would consider it pretty powerful.

Well considering I just loaded it on my spare Intel iMac (1st gen) which has 1 (ONE) gb of ram and an 80gb WD hdd in it and it doesn't stall at the login screen, would that answer your question?

The main system I have here (am on it now), is more powerful than the one in your sig without issues. My friend's PC matches most of the specs of yours, and she has no issues either. Different HDD's though, which again, is my suggested culprit.

Well considering I just loaded it on my spare Intel iMac (1st gen) which has 1 (ONE) gb of ram and an 80gb WD hdd in it and it doesn't stall at the login screen, would that answer your question?

The main system I have here (am on it now), is more powerful than the one in your sig without issues. My friend's PC matches most of the specs of yours, and she has no issues either. Different HDD's though, which again, is my suggested culprit.

Thanks for the quick response.

I may try reloading Windows on a spare 160GB Western Digital Drive. It's around the specs of a WD Blue if I'm not mistaken. Do you think that would be any better?

Remove all the drives from your PC. Put the WD blue in and try it, do a format, load fresh.

I think you'll get good results. Not as good as a Black, but shouldn't be bad either!

Ehh, if you have the cash, splash out on a Raptor - that's what powers my main system. ;)

I was having a similar issue on my two Windows7 laptops, one 32bit, one 64bit (I haven't installed it on a non-laptop yet). After logging in the 'Welcome' screen/message would stay there and spin for ~30secs before finally showing me my desktop. I can't remember where I found it on the 'net, but it my issue was caused because I had changed my desktop background to a solid color. Change it to an image... voila! Welcome only lasts 2-3secs. Go figure.

The paging file shouldn't be causing this. It's more than likely a hardware issue or a shell extension causing problems.

The page file has ALWAYS caused this, even under xp & 2000!

Moving it to another physical hard drive has always sped up windows boot and responsiveness by up to 4 times normal.

Moving it to another partition on the same drive is no good, it has to be on a seperate hdd to windows so you get two lots of HDD bandwidth available to windows.

SSD's are not excluded from this strategy, they're not that much faster than IDE's.

Could be an application too.. Do you have any antivirus installed??? Kaspersky?

I have heard kaspersky has a bug and it will make the desktop unresponsive for a while.

I have Microsoft Security Essentials installed, but this also happened without any antivirus program installed.

The page file has ALWAYS caused this, even under xp & 2000!

Moving it to another physical hard drive has always sped up windows boot and responsiveness by up to 4 times normal.

Moving it to another partition on the same drive is no good, it has to be on a seperate hdd to windows so you get two lots of HDD bandwidth available to windows.

SSD's are not excluded from this strategy, they're not that much faster than IDE's.

I tried this, and the boot times were actually worse with the page file on a different drive.

Remove all the drives from your PC. Put the WD blue in and try it, do a format, load fresh.

I think you'll get good results. Not as good as a Black, but shouldn't be bad either!

Ehh, if you have the cash, splash out on a Raptor - that's what powers my main system. ;)

I think that's what I'm going to end up trying. I don't have enough money to drop on a Raptor right now, but I wish I did :(.

Here are the times I recorded using my iPod Touch's stopwatch.

Page File on C: Drive

21 seconds to Welcome Screen

32 seconds to Desktop

38 seconds to Responsive Desktop

Page File on Seperate Drive

36 seconds to Welcome Screen

48 seconds to Desktop

57 seconds to Responsive Desktop

The only thing that I have seen anything that has done this was a client of mine installed AVG ontop of MSE which was corrected by removing AVG and reinstalling MSE

I would open the System Configuration Utility and goto the startup tab and uncheck each non microsoft program one by one and restart until you find the offending software

The only thing that I have seen anything that has done this was a client of mine installed AVG ontop of MSE which was corrected by removing AVG and reinstalling MSE

I would open the System Configuration Utility and goto the startup tab and uncheck each non microsoft program one by one and restart until you find the offending software

I only have two startup programs, which include MSE and my Logitech Setpoint software for my mouse. I hadn't even installed setpoint until a week ago, and this problem was happening prior to that.

Page File on C: Drive

21 seconds to Welcome Screen

32 seconds to Desktop

38 seconds to Responsive Desktop

Page File on Seperate Drive

36 seconds to Welcome Screen

48 seconds to Desktop

57 seconds to Responsive Desktop

That's quite a noticeable effect, and would lead me to think that maybe it's this second drive that's causing the problem. I'd certainly try just using one HDD; removing the others, and format/re-install. If you've got time, repeat this for all your drives to try and see if one drive is particularly slower than the others.

That's quite a noticeable effect, and would lead me to think that maybe it's this second drive that's causing the problem. I'd certainly try just using one HDD; removing the others, and format/re-install. If you've got time, repeat this for all your drives to try and see if one drive is particularly slower than the others.

I believe I tried disconnecting the other drives and using only the one, but it can't hurt to try again. I'll let you know if that helps at all.

If that doesn't make a difference I will try using the other drive I was talking about earlier.

One other thing that occurs to me... It may seem obvious, but have you checked that you have SATA drivers installed? I know when I installed 7 it was running OK-ish, but ran much better when I went and got the proper drivers from the Dell (in my case) website. In fact, I had to grab quite a few drivers for various hardware before everything was working just right.

I believe I tried disconnecting the other drives and using only the one, but it can't hurt to try again. I'll let you know if that helps at all.

If that doesn't make a difference I will try using the other drive I was talking about earlier.

Can you look at the Cpu resource usage in task manager?

One other thing that occurs to me... It may seem obvious, but have you checked that you have SATA drivers installed? I know when I installed 7 it was running OK-ish, but ran much better when I went and got the proper drivers from the Dell (in my case) website. In fact, I had to grab quite a few drivers for various hardware before everything was working just right.

I've looked all over, my motherboard's website, Intel, Google, and I can't find a SATA driver for my motherboard (ECS Elitegroup G31T-M) :(

My motherboard disk does include a SATA RAID driver though, is that what I'm looking for? Does the Chipset driver include a SATA Driver? I can get that off of the motherboard's website as well.

Can you look at the Cpu resource usage in task manager?

cpuboot.jpg

Here is a screenshot of the Task Manager displaying my CPU usage right after boot. It doesn't go above 50% for each core, but does spike randomly. Is that normal?

The O.P. also said he did a fresh install and got the problem - so we've ruled out ANY external application.

SATA drivers (unlikely) or hard drives are the only remaining thing that could produce this sort of problem.

It's also NOT related to the page file, moving it to another drive is going to achieve nothing, or degrade performance in many cases.

BB:

That's normal, services are starting and getting ready for use. (Indexing, Superfetch, etc).

In your device manager - what IDE controllers do you have listed?

They'll have the SATA controllers there, i'll let you know which driver/s you may need, if any.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!