FOSS alternative to Exchange?


Recommended Posts

Hope this is the right place to ask.

To make a somewhat long and complicated story short, we're looking at moving our company E-mail off of a dedicated appliance and onto a server running some kind of centralized E-mail system. Our support company wants to implement MS Exchange. I do not want to implement MS Exchange. The reasons are mainly licensing costs, closed/proprietary systems, and the fact that I worked somewhere before that used Exchange and had no end of problems with it.

I'm hoping to find a free (as in beer - for the purposes of this topic, consider me unwilling to pay any money at all for the software itself) open-source alternative to Exchange so I can hopefully save the company some money and save myself the problems we had with Exchange at my old organization.

I'm a one-person department, so I'm looking for something that is easy to install, setup, and maintain. I do not have the luxury of reading manuals for more than a few minutes at a time to figure out what I need to do, as my time is already split between about 20 things at any given time of day.

If Exchange really, truly, honestly is the best E-mail system out there, which I frankly doubt, then that's fine and I'll go with it. As it is, however, I'm relatively sure that there must be something superior to Exchange that costs less and avoids vendor lock-in to Microsoft.

Any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/846962-foss-alternative-to-exchange/
Share on other sites

Sounds like your exchange was never set up correctly. In 4yrs at my job I have never had to touch my Exchange 2003 boxes unless I am running updates, and I have 3 servers with email for over 2,500 people.

Why doesn't your company just outsource it's email to a hosted exchange provider? I was in a similar situation to you, having to manage an email server with little time or inclination to learn what was necessary and eventually we switched to an external provider. Ultimately, it costs us less to do that than to put up with downtime and other hassles associated with managing a server without the right experience.

BTW, Exchange is great and I can't praise it enough. Exchange and Outlook make a killer combination.

100% agree with the outsourcing of MS Exchange. You can do this very cost effectively, not sure if it would be cheaper than MS licensing costs in the case of 2500 users. You could either have someone manage your current setup for you (consultant, etc.) or you could move to a hosted Echange model.

I just set up a small business with this service from 123Together, you can go to http://www.123together.com/ to read more about them. I am in no way affiliated with this company.

Also, if you are looking at Free/Open Source, sendmail and postfix are two great options. Exchange is a really elegant solution, especially for calendaring and collaboration (Office Communication Server). Coming from a die-hard UNIX guy, I can't say enough good things about Exchange.

There are plenty of F/OSS mail servers out there, but you are not going to find a free alternative that comes close to replicating Exchange Server. You're really doing this wrong with the 'I don't want Exchange' attitude, because Exchange truly is a brilliant piece of software. I'd echo the reccomendations for a hosted exchange solution.

+1 Zimbra

We are in the process of mirgrating to Zimbra, having set-up a Zimbra server I can say that it is a joy to work with.

I would be happy to help with any questions you might have but Zimbra would be something you should look into ASAP.

Thanks for all the input. I'm not sure about hosted Exchange, I'd kinda prefer to keep things in-house if possible. I think I'm going to have to take a good, long look at the latest version of Exchange and see what all it has to offer, since it seems to get high accolades around here.

Also, with regard to Zimbra, my next question is to the point of client-side compatibility. Will Outlook work with Zimbra as more than just a POP3 client? What about calendar sharing? BlackBerry syncing? And the big one - does Outlook interoperability cost money?

Also, if we go with Zimbra, I'm planning on running it on a Linux server (which may actually be a requirement, as I can't recall offhand if there was a Windows version or not). Is there a distro that's particularly well-suited to run it? Debian, Slackware, SuSE, Fedora...?

Thanks again!

...

Also, if we go with Zimbra, I'm planning on running it on a Linux server (which may actually be a requirement, as I can't recall offhand if there was a Windows version or not). Is there a distro that's particularly well-suited to run it? Debian, Slackware, SuSE, Fedora...?

Thanks again!

Generally, for server work, I would go with something a little less consumer-y. You don't need the latest "packages of the day", and want stability and a proven, tested track record.

Something along the lines of Red Hat (it is popular and built for servers)? Use the free clone of it: CentOS (Y)

Generally, for server work, I would go with something a little less consumer-y. You don't need the latest "packages of the day", and want stability and a proven, tested track record.

Something along the lines of Red Hat (it is popular and built for servers)? Use the free clone of it: CentOS (Y)

I run CentOS 5 on a server here at work. It runs an internal wiki and a Subversion respository. Had no troubles with it. Another option I would suggest is the latest Ubuntu LTS release. What I do like about CentOS is the gui based tools for configuration.

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • lots of people us facebook for stuff, threads though no
    • Can you read? I've said I'm willing to pay more for a notchless (no notch) 3:2 screen.
    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      100
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!