FOSS alternative to Exchange?


Recommended Posts

Hope this is the right place to ask.

To make a somewhat long and complicated story short, we're looking at moving our company E-mail off of a dedicated appliance and onto a server running some kind of centralized E-mail system. Our support company wants to implement MS Exchange. I do not want to implement MS Exchange. The reasons are mainly licensing costs, closed/proprietary systems, and the fact that I worked somewhere before that used Exchange and had no end of problems with it.

I'm hoping to find a free (as in beer - for the purposes of this topic, consider me unwilling to pay any money at all for the software itself) open-source alternative to Exchange so I can hopefully save the company some money and save myself the problems we had with Exchange at my old organization.

I'm a one-person department, so I'm looking for something that is easy to install, setup, and maintain. I do not have the luxury of reading manuals for more than a few minutes at a time to figure out what I need to do, as my time is already split between about 20 things at any given time of day.

If Exchange really, truly, honestly is the best E-mail system out there, which I frankly doubt, then that's fine and I'll go with it. As it is, however, I'm relatively sure that there must be something superior to Exchange that costs less and avoids vendor lock-in to Microsoft.

Any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/846962-foss-alternative-to-exchange/
Share on other sites

Sounds like your exchange was never set up correctly. In 4yrs at my job I have never had to touch my Exchange 2003 boxes unless I am running updates, and I have 3 servers with email for over 2,500 people.

Why doesn't your company just outsource it's email to a hosted exchange provider? I was in a similar situation to you, having to manage an email server with little time or inclination to learn what was necessary and eventually we switched to an external provider. Ultimately, it costs us less to do that than to put up with downtime and other hassles associated with managing a server without the right experience.

BTW, Exchange is great and I can't praise it enough. Exchange and Outlook make a killer combination.

100% agree with the outsourcing of MS Exchange. You can do this very cost effectively, not sure if it would be cheaper than MS licensing costs in the case of 2500 users. You could either have someone manage your current setup for you (consultant, etc.) or you could move to a hosted Echange model.

I just set up a small business with this service from 123Together, you can go to http://www.123together.com/ to read more about them. I am in no way affiliated with this company.

Also, if you are looking at Free/Open Source, sendmail and postfix are two great options. Exchange is a really elegant solution, especially for calendaring and collaboration (Office Communication Server). Coming from a die-hard UNIX guy, I can't say enough good things about Exchange.

There are plenty of F/OSS mail servers out there, but you are not going to find a free alternative that comes close to replicating Exchange Server. You're really doing this wrong with the 'I don't want Exchange' attitude, because Exchange truly is a brilliant piece of software. I'd echo the reccomendations for a hosted exchange solution.

+1 Zimbra

We are in the process of mirgrating to Zimbra, having set-up a Zimbra server I can say that it is a joy to work with.

I would be happy to help with any questions you might have but Zimbra would be something you should look into ASAP.

Thanks for all the input. I'm not sure about hosted Exchange, I'd kinda prefer to keep things in-house if possible. I think I'm going to have to take a good, long look at the latest version of Exchange and see what all it has to offer, since it seems to get high accolades around here.

Also, with regard to Zimbra, my next question is to the point of client-side compatibility. Will Outlook work with Zimbra as more than just a POP3 client? What about calendar sharing? BlackBerry syncing? And the big one - does Outlook interoperability cost money?

Also, if we go with Zimbra, I'm planning on running it on a Linux server (which may actually be a requirement, as I can't recall offhand if there was a Windows version or not). Is there a distro that's particularly well-suited to run it? Debian, Slackware, SuSE, Fedora...?

Thanks again!

...

Also, if we go with Zimbra, I'm planning on running it on a Linux server (which may actually be a requirement, as I can't recall offhand if there was a Windows version or not). Is there a distro that's particularly well-suited to run it? Debian, Slackware, SuSE, Fedora...?

Thanks again!

Generally, for server work, I would go with something a little less consumer-y. You don't need the latest "packages of the day", and want stability and a proven, tested track record.

Something along the lines of Red Hat (it is popular and built for servers)? Use the free clone of it: CentOS (Y)

Generally, for server work, I would go with something a little less consumer-y. You don't need the latest "packages of the day", and want stability and a proven, tested track record.

Something along the lines of Red Hat (it is popular and built for servers)? Use the free clone of it: CentOS (Y)

I run CentOS 5 on a server here at work. It runs an internal wiki and a Subversion respository. Had no troubles with it. Another option I would suggest is the latest Ubuntu LTS release. What I do like about CentOS is the gui based tools for configuration.

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
    • Watch Louis Rossmann's recent experience on YouTube about trying to get a warranty replacement from Samsung. It's crazy.
    • That is the thing, how many of these people don't realise they are using AI? If they use Google Search they have no choice but to use AI. So yes, maybe half of American adults do use and I expect a lot of Uk adults do to, but I bet most of them don't realise it. Myself, i avoid the rubbish.
    • They use FREE AI. They aren't paying for this meme-generating slopware...
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!