FOSS alternative to Exchange?


Recommended Posts

Hope this is the right place to ask.

To make a somewhat long and complicated story short, we're looking at moving our company E-mail off of a dedicated appliance and onto a server running some kind of centralized E-mail system. Our support company wants to implement MS Exchange. I do not want to implement MS Exchange. The reasons are mainly licensing costs, closed/proprietary systems, and the fact that I worked somewhere before that used Exchange and had no end of problems with it.

I'm hoping to find a free (as in beer - for the purposes of this topic, consider me unwilling to pay any money at all for the software itself) open-source alternative to Exchange so I can hopefully save the company some money and save myself the problems we had with Exchange at my old organization.

I'm a one-person department, so I'm looking for something that is easy to install, setup, and maintain. I do not have the luxury of reading manuals for more than a few minutes at a time to figure out what I need to do, as my time is already split between about 20 things at any given time of day.

If Exchange really, truly, honestly is the best E-mail system out there, which I frankly doubt, then that's fine and I'll go with it. As it is, however, I'm relatively sure that there must be something superior to Exchange that costs less and avoids vendor lock-in to Microsoft.

Any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/846962-foss-alternative-to-exchange/
Share on other sites

Sounds like your exchange was never set up correctly. In 4yrs at my job I have never had to touch my Exchange 2003 boxes unless I am running updates, and I have 3 servers with email for over 2,500 people.

Why doesn't your company just outsource it's email to a hosted exchange provider? I was in a similar situation to you, having to manage an email server with little time or inclination to learn what was necessary and eventually we switched to an external provider. Ultimately, it costs us less to do that than to put up with downtime and other hassles associated with managing a server without the right experience.

BTW, Exchange is great and I can't praise it enough. Exchange and Outlook make a killer combination.

100% agree with the outsourcing of MS Exchange. You can do this very cost effectively, not sure if it would be cheaper than MS licensing costs in the case of 2500 users. You could either have someone manage your current setup for you (consultant, etc.) or you could move to a hosted Echange model.

I just set up a small business with this service from 123Together, you can go to http://www.123together.com/ to read more about them. I am in no way affiliated with this company.

Also, if you are looking at Free/Open Source, sendmail and postfix are two great options. Exchange is a really elegant solution, especially for calendaring and collaboration (Office Communication Server). Coming from a die-hard UNIX guy, I can't say enough good things about Exchange.

There are plenty of F/OSS mail servers out there, but you are not going to find a free alternative that comes close to replicating Exchange Server. You're really doing this wrong with the 'I don't want Exchange' attitude, because Exchange truly is a brilliant piece of software. I'd echo the reccomendations for a hosted exchange solution.

+1 Zimbra

We are in the process of mirgrating to Zimbra, having set-up a Zimbra server I can say that it is a joy to work with.

I would be happy to help with any questions you might have but Zimbra would be something you should look into ASAP.

Thanks for all the input. I'm not sure about hosted Exchange, I'd kinda prefer to keep things in-house if possible. I think I'm going to have to take a good, long look at the latest version of Exchange and see what all it has to offer, since it seems to get high accolades around here.

Also, with regard to Zimbra, my next question is to the point of client-side compatibility. Will Outlook work with Zimbra as more than just a POP3 client? What about calendar sharing? BlackBerry syncing? And the big one - does Outlook interoperability cost money?

Also, if we go with Zimbra, I'm planning on running it on a Linux server (which may actually be a requirement, as I can't recall offhand if there was a Windows version or not). Is there a distro that's particularly well-suited to run it? Debian, Slackware, SuSE, Fedora...?

Thanks again!

...

Also, if we go with Zimbra, I'm planning on running it on a Linux server (which may actually be a requirement, as I can't recall offhand if there was a Windows version or not). Is there a distro that's particularly well-suited to run it? Debian, Slackware, SuSE, Fedora...?

Thanks again!

Generally, for server work, I would go with something a little less consumer-y. You don't need the latest "packages of the day", and want stability and a proven, tested track record.

Something along the lines of Red Hat (it is popular and built for servers)? Use the free clone of it: CentOS (Y)

Generally, for server work, I would go with something a little less consumer-y. You don't need the latest "packages of the day", and want stability and a proven, tested track record.

Something along the lines of Red Hat (it is popular and built for servers)? Use the free clone of it: CentOS (Y)

I run CentOS 5 on a server here at work. It runs an internal wiki and a Subversion respository. Had no troubles with it. Another option I would suggest is the latest Ubuntu LTS release. What I do like about CentOS is the gui based tools for configuration.

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!