• 0

The Power of Word 2010


Question

Hi guys,

I downloaded Word 2010 this morning and so far it's great; a lot quicker and more stable than the Technical Preview. How about your experiences?

I just wanted to share the below example with you. This Word document was made from a blank document in 20 minutes using just Word 2010 for all the image editing (background removal, hand drawn effect, reflection, glow etc.). There's some OpenType and other features used too.

I know it's far from perfect, but being able to get professional results using only Word is really great.

4116967956_6a6cdd6c64_b.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/847150-the-power-of-word-2010/
Share on other sites

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

With Word and PowerPoint even, you are able to create presentations far beyond professional. It seems more futuristic than professional by what I mean. I would love to see a similar design on the drive-thru starbucks we have in some parts of California.

  • 0
With Word and PowerPoint even, you are able to create presentations far beyond professional. It seems more futuristic than professional by what I mean. I would love to see a similar design on the drive-thru starbucks we have in some parts of California.

That's true! Now PowerPoint 2010 uses DirectX, the animations and transitions are really slick. It's a shame a lot of people and businesses are still using older versions of Office (my company still has Office XP installed on some fairly powerful systems @@).

  • 0
That's true! Now PowerPoint 2010 uses DirectX, the animations and transitions are really slick. It's a shame a lot of people and businesses are still using older versions of Office (my company still has Office XP installed on some fairly powerful systems @@).

DirectX use is good for some older machines with decent graphics cards too if it uses DX9 because my old machine lags on animations so I need to use the laptop. My 7600GT feels like a very big wimp :(

  • 0

Office 2010 is awesome. Started using the first Technical Preview and am using the beta now. The speed as mentioned is great on 64 bit systems and I love how everything seems way more efficient (auto-hide ribbon functionality, being able to collapse non-essential areas, etc..) I love it :)

  • 0
Thanks Anaron (and sorry about posting in the wrong forum; I'm still new :blushing: )

As for the beta, so far it's a lot more stable that the technical preview, and I believe it's free until next October.

You're welcome. That's alright, you know better now. ;)

Next October? I figured Office 2010 would be out by next summer. According to Wikipedia, the purported release date is Spring 2010.

  • 0

I agree, guys, beta software always gets me hooked, then it's hard to go back :( In the case of Office, I use it every day for work and play, so it's a big part of my computer use.

Compared with the big changes in Office 2007, 2010 feels like a nice revision and polishing, just as Windows 7 feels compared with Vista. Things like being able to customize the ribbon, a smoother workflow with more professional results, advanced image tools (like searchable OCR for images!) are all nice improvements.

As for the release date, Microsoft says the first half of 2010 in their FAQ, so I guess they'll be an RC early next year then RTM in Spring, but that's just a guess. I suppose the October expiry is just like Windows 7 RTM's long expiry period; to give people plenty of time to play without feeling rushed.

About the example, the original is on flickr (either that or you're saying it's not a good example, haha, which is okay since it was done so quickly).

P.S. Just for your reference, the official FAQ (regarding the expiry and everything else) is at: http://www.microsoft.com/office/2010/en/fa...aspx#5zzf104020

  • 0
I did this in Word 2007 too.

I don't have the same fonts etc... and I dunno how to change the shadow color (is it even possible?)

Hi EddiePwnsYou,

The title font in mine is Gabriola, which ships with Windows 7, if you have that. However, to get all the swirls, it needs OpenType support, which only comes with Office 2010.

As for the shadow color, just right-click on the object, choose 'Format Shape' and there should be a 'Shadow' option (I think this was the case in Word 2007, anyway). In there you can change the shadow color, depth, angle etc. You can also edit the 3D settings from the same dialog box).

I hope this helps :)

  • 0
@Just Jonty: Could you upload *.docx file?

Sure, please find the file attached (just rename it *.docx).

Please note I have no rights to the Starbucks logo, it's being used only for educational purposes, so don't do anything with it you shouldn't ^^

Also, because of the time limit, some of the techniques used here are 'quick and dirty'. Anyway, have a look and you're welcome to ask any questions if anything's unclear.

Starbucks.txt

  • 0
Sure, please find the file attached (just rename it *.docx).

Please note I have no rights to the Starbucks logo, it's being used only for educational purposes, so don't do anything with it you shouldn't ^^

Also, because of the time limit, some of the techniques used here are 'quick and dirty'. Anyway, have a look and you're welcome to ask any questions if anything's unclear.

No worry for legal right, i just wanted to see how its done :)

Thanks :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!