Why are some people cheap when it comes to buying movies?


Recommended Posts

Sorry if this thread is kinda stupid, but I need to wrap my head around this logic. I apologize if this question offends anyone. But I have a few friends all of which own a PS3. They have about 4 or 5 PS3 games which they play and shockingly they only have like 3-4 titles on Blu-ray. I ask them, why only 3-4 movies? They?re like: because they?re too expensive.

Long story short, I try to prove them wrong. A few movies they like are: The Dark Knight, Cars, Requiem for a Dream, and V For Vendetta. Respectably, at Amazon, they currently cost $16.99, $15.49, $9.49, and $9.99. They still say ?no? despite the fact that they're cheap and they love those movies. I mean, what?s so expensive about that? These are movies you like and can own on HD FOREVER. All for less than $20 a pop! But no, they rather spend it on drinking, partying, etc, all of which cost more and are only temporary.

Again, I really do apologize if this post is offensive to anyone. But hopefully it won?t be since this is a Home Theater thread. Does anyone understand why many people seem to be real cheapskates when it comes to buying movies? I mean, come on! Only $10 for a movie you like in HD? Far be it for me to tell anyone how to spend their money, but I?m far from rich and I consider $10-15 for a BD a giveaway. I don?t understand why some think it?s a lot of money.

I think people are starting to realize that buying movies (dvd or even bluray) is pointless to some. I think a good % of people only end up watching a movie they purchased once. So they could have just rented it at a fraction of the price. Now this obviously does not apply to everyone so I can only speak for a few people that I know. A few years ago I stopped buying DVDs because a quick glance at my library I realized that I did not watch half of them. I promised myself I would not do that with Blurays but it seems I already started. Luckily this time around I only buy Blurays when its a great deal and most of the time its not a movie I have already seen (thus forcing me to watch it at least once). I have yet to come across a DVD that I owned that I watched more then TWO times. With the economy the way it is... Netflix has been working out just fine for me.

I think it comes down to viewing habits. I have some great movies on DVD that I never watch. I end up watching something new on TV or I play a game. Some of it comes down to ease and laziness. Some of it is watching something new.

A specific example I can think of is Braveheart. I bought it on DVD when it came out. Since then, I've maybe watched it 3 times. But, when it's on TV, I'll stop to watch it (it has to be unedited on a premium channel).

There are so many different things to watch that it comes down to what I feel in the mood for. I'd rather see something that I haven't seen than pop even a great movie into a player.

I see now. With my DVDs, it was like that. Most movies were only watched once. But with Blu-ray, watching movies is a whole new experience for me now. So, I have about 35 movies, all of which have been watched about 3-5 times, with the exception of a couple which I just bought last week. I don't know about anyone else, but I always enjoy rewatching my Blu-ray collection. The picture is so amazing that you just can't get enough of it. But that's just me.

Thanks for the replies.

I currently own 38 bluray movies and 29 PS3 games. I don't buy every movie that I would want to as it can work out expensive purchasing a few in a month. But I certainly get those that I feel the HD quality will be shown through on.

The only point of owning a collection of movies is to entertain family or visits when they're over (some younger kids might get bored with the "adult talk" etc...), otherwise netflix is awesome (shame there is no netflix in Mexico, not even live streaming) since, as most have said, you really don't watch most movies more than once or twice.

First off most people don't need to own any movies, renting or borrowing them is a much more economical choice so you can rightly spend your money on drinking and carousing.

Second, the quality bump for BluRay compared to an upconverted DVD, which the PS3 does a good job of for the most part, simply isn't worth the cost unless its new and on sale. Most BluRay movies are about $30-40 so for a little more I could buy a game that would give me more entertainment dollar/hour.

Third, *******s like Lucas keep trumping up old IP with new super versions, it kinda leaves a bad taste after awhile.

DVD is still alive and well. People often bring movies to their friends home, etc. and not everyone has a HD player, but most everyone has a DVD player, or god forbid, a computer connected to a 20" monitor to watch the movie off of. Some people just don't care about the increase in quality nor have a big enough screen to appreciate the HD glory, so they'll save a few bucks whenever they can. And let's not forget these are college students. Most of us are poor.

Some people, including myself, don't really care about blu-ray, or need the higher quality for the extra price.

Alot of people only tend to watch DVDs two or three times anyway, so they might as well spend it on partying or even drinks + snack to watch the DVD with.

Very good question.

I've never seen the intelligence in stock piling dvd's, vhs's, etc.

When my wife joined the dvd club a few years ago, after HAVING to have a home theater system for Christmas, she started ordering dvd's. I think she bought about 20 of them before finally quitting the club. 14 of those movies are setting on the bottom shelf still unopened and unwatched even once!

Setting in front of the boob tube does nothing for me except put me to sleep.

I'd much rather have the short lived fun of a party over falling asleep watching some dumb rerun of a movie any day myself!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • OpenClaw now has native mobile apps on iOS and Android by Karthik Mudaliar OpenClaw, the viral open-source personal AI agent, now has its own mobile app, available on both Android and iOS. Users can pair the app with an existing OpenClaw gateway and can start using new mobile-native features that are now available on the app. The app supports all the existing features you'd already have seen on OpenClaw's TUI, as well as some more, such as real-time and background Talk mode, action approvals, sharing from iOS, and optional access to device capabilities such as camera, screen, location, photos, contacts, calendar, and reminders. These features are available on both the Android and iOS versions of the app. What's important with these apps is that they don't run OpenClaw on your phone, but are actually just companion apps that require a running OpenClaw Gateway on an existing device, on macOS, Linux, or Windows via WSL2. To pair the app with your existing OpenClaw gateway, users need to run the command "/pair qr" on the TUI or existing chat interface, which brings up a QR code. Users can then scan this QR code to pair it up with the mobile app. There's also an option to manually pair the app by entering the host and a port. Previously, OpenClaw had been available on phones via WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Matrix, and others. Now, with a native mobile app, the interface is much cleaner and more focused on just the OpenClaw, of course, with the added support for camera, screen, location, and more. It's important to note that OpenClaw comes with its own security warnings. There's always a chance of prompt injection with these tools, so users are recommended to double-check authentication, tool policy, sandboxing, and execution approvals rather than prompts alone. For users well-versed with the AI harness, a native mobile app makes it easier to approve an automation, share a link, use voice, or let an agent react to phone-side context.
    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.5 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.5 changelog: Fixed an intermittent crash when using Area Capture Improved stability for Area Capture and screen recording Resolved a capture issue that could occur right after startup Download: Kalmuri 4.2.5 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.5 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • They have lots of info on me, I have a facebook account and have done so for years, it was the thing to have then. My phone number is not on it. I don't have the Facebook app on my phone these days, just the messenger part, and only for a couple of people to contact me, most will text me via SMS or phone. I agree, Meta, like others, even without an account will know something about me. Just have to try and keep some things private Also, never saw the need for Whatsapp, people used to ask for me to join it, but as I said to them, I have SMS and a phone, use that, or email
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      100
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!