Naked coke can concept


Recommended Posts

Found this really interesting story plus concept over at Gizmodo, and thought I'd share it..

500x_ecocan01.jpg

It doesn't only look beautiful and it will make Jon Ive and Steve Jobs wet, but this naked Coca-Cola can would help save energy while reducing air and water pollution. Would it really make a difference? Let's do some math:

I assume the consumption only increases through time, but let's take the daily 2007 numbers from Global INForM Cases Sales database, the total number of Coca-Cola cans sold per worldwide is 67,873,309. Diet Coke and Coke Zero sold 35,387,241, while My Coke sold 103,260,550. Yes, that's all per day.

So taking only the classic Coca-Cola, that's 24,773,757,785 every year. Twenty-four billion cans. That is indeed a lot of paint and paint removal products. Because this doesn't only affect the production. It also affects the recycling, which will eliminate a step:

The naked can help to reduce air and water pollution occurred in its coloring process. It also reduces energy and effort to separate toxic color paint from aluminum in recycling process. Huge amount of energy and paint required to manufacture colored cans will be saved. Instead of toxic paint, manufacturers process aluminum with a pressing machine that indicates brand identity on surface.

Sounds good to me, and it even looks better if you take into account all kinds of Coke. That brings up the number to 75,380,201,500 cans. I don't know how much paint that represents, but I'm guessing quite a few thousand tons.

Source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/847326-naked-coke-can-concept/
Share on other sites

Now...if they had sold this during the Terminator 2 era...

It indeed looks like something that could be popular in the younger market. However, you do have a lot of older folks that will only stick with what they know and the familiar packaging.

I could see Coke doing these as a test run in select markets and if it proved popular, then it might be a 25% saturation for the rest of the world/country.

Another place I could see this would be in some sort of sci-fi movie.

Of course, being a sucker for this type of design, I probably would buy at least 1 12 pack just for holiday parties when bringing goodies. :)

The problem with this design concept is that the technology to make the embossed cans like that would require major modifications to the production line, if it is even possible with current technology. There's a reason you don't see embossed cans like this: the machinery needed would be outrageously complex.

edit: people in the thread there also bring up another valid point. It would be nearly impossible to use this technique for the legally required nutrition information on the cans.

Edited by bluedragon1971
edit: people in the thread there also bring up another valid point. It would be nearly impossible to use this technique for the legally required nutrition information on the cans.

Maybe there would still have to be some printing on it then, even if that was the only thing printed, it would still reduce waste & energy by a considerable amount.

You've also got a problem, that if Coke switch to naked cans... every supermarket would jump on it and change there packaging to the old coke packaging to try and seduce the customers :p

That's not a problem...it's called ingenious marketing. Vendors will be buying up the product in record numbers. Just like when coke changed its recipe. People thought it was a failure. It ended up being an incredible, profitable marketing scheme...especially when the original recipe was brought back into production.

I'm sure they could use the naked cans in those multipack boxes by printing the information on the box?

Many shops buy those multipack boxes so they could sell the cans as a full individual item. Many shops here do this. That is why I still see Nutuional info on EACH packet/can that has food in it even if sold as a pack.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!