Thermal Paste needed for Slot 1 CPU?


Recommended Posts

I?ve ordered a Pentium 3 550mhz (SL3F7), minus heatsink. I already have a 600mhz (SL3JM) version siting around, that never worked properly, that has attached a large passive heatsink. I had to modify this h/s, cutting off the ends, so that CPU could be seated in the slot (it still only mounted adequately, not 100% securely). Anyway, question is: if I swap that h/s onto the 550, do I need then to use any thermal paste between CPU and sink? There?s a white plastic looking patch on the h/s where it mounts to the CPU.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/847680-thermal-paste-needed-for-slot-1-cpu/
Share on other sites

Most of the people on this board are probably not old enough to remember the P3 :-p

The white plastic thermal pad should be cleaned off and new thermal paste applied between the CPU and the heat sink. I would probably recommend using a fan, as I'm not sure a passive HS is adequate for a P3 550. I had a room with two P3 1 GHz PCs and an Athlon 733 MHz at one point and remember it being quite a hot room.

Sounds like cotton swabs and alcohol is the ideal way to clean the old paste off:

http://www.overclock.net/amd-cpus/335074-b...-paste-off.html

Hope this helps!

Very helpful, cheers! I drew a blank from a local hardware store and chemist, for those cleaners mentioned in that link. I removed the white pad from the h/s using my thumbnail and Auto Glym Engine & Machine Cleaner ?basically a ?powerful water-based biodegradable degreaser?. I?m reluctant to try that on the CPU. I?ll try again for something more appropriate tomorrow, unless you think I can get away with the Auto Glym cleaner?

I?ve got some Arctic Ceramic, that would be okay to use as thermal paste?

Perhaps the 600MHz CPU never worked well because it was using just a passive heat sink.

Incidentally, back in the P3 days, I typically just used contact without any fancy thermal pastes to attach and active heat sink/fan to a slot1 P3.

These days, the thermal paste may cost more than the CPU.

The 600 booted up fine, and I could use various programmes, but FireFox crashed if you visited various web pages. FF had to be used as the browser, so I dumped the 600.

That just sounds to me like it needs a proper heatsink/fan combo. It's designed to be 600/100 but how well does it run at 400MHz (400/66). It should be locked at 6x.

Very helpful, cheers! I drew a blank from a local hardware store and chemist, for those cleaners mentioned in that link. I removed the white pad from the h/s using my thumbnail and Auto Glym Engine & Machine Cleaner ?basically a ?powerful water-based biodegradable degreaser?. I?m reluctant to try that on the CPU. I?ll try again for something more appropriate tomorrow, unless you think I can get away with the Auto Glym cleaner?

Honestly, I would avoid things like that altogether. You want something that is completely pure and that won't leave behind any sort of residue. Ideally something like isopropyl alcohol (but not things like nail-polish remover, because that has additives), although acetone will also work extremely well provided the surfaces are metal. Heat spreaders and sinks usually are, but going from memory I think most of the slot 1 boards expose the processor directly and don't have a heat spreader, and so could potentially be damaged by acetone. Go with isopropyl alcohol, and give the heat sink a going over as well, in case the automotive cleaner left anything behind.

Provided the heat sink and processor physically touch, any HTC compound should be fine. I don't know what that particular Arctic product is, but it'll probably be fine.

Thanks for everyones advice.

That just sounds to me like it needs a proper heatsink/fan combo. It's designed to be 600/100 but how well does it run at 400MHz (400/66). It should be locked at 6x.
But why didn't the whole system crash, if you're suggesting the CPU thermally shut down? It was just FF that crashed and only on certain web pages, always the same pages. I'll see if it runs at 400.

Well the 550 isn?t working either. Just like the 600, it boots fine, and no problem with other programs, and no problem with most sites FireFox visits, apart from a few where ?Doctor Watson for Windows NT? interrupts things with: ?an application error has occurred and an application error log is being generated. FireFox exe.?

It?s not overheating, I aimed a fan at it.

According to this site, these CPU's should work with my P2B rev 1.10:

http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/p2...pgrade_faq.html

I was thinking maybe one last chance and get the 400 version of the Celeron 333, that it?s already running.

Edited by Deisel Weisel

Isopropyl Alcohol works well to clean

Arctic MX-2/3 is great paste.. Its like Arctic silver 5 but without the set in time

Two different processors, but the same problem.... Sounds to me like you're barking up the wrong tree. I would re-think my diagnosis if I were you.

I'm thinking he should run Memtest and test his memory for defects.

Two different processors, but the same problem.... Sounds to me like you're barking up the wrong tree. I would re-think my diagnosis if I were you.

+1

If the only issue you're seeing is Firefox crashing on certain webpages, that would not suggest a processor issue. Sounds more like a software issue, but it's hard to say without getting the full picture (system specs, OS, Firefox version, etc).

I'm thinking he should run Memtest and test his memory for defects.
The current Celeron 333 works fine. Maybe Pentium uses the memory slightly differently. Maybe I'll try that Memtest when I have time. Thanks.
+1

If the only issue you're seeing is Firefox crashing on certain webpages, that would not suggest a processor issue. Sounds more like a software issue, but it's hard to say without getting the full picture (system specs, OS, Firefox version, etc).

Okay, I'll list the spec later.
I'm thinking he should run Memtest and test his memory for defects.

Memtest is a good idea, you should aim for 10 rounds without any errors.

I built a PIII 667 based computer & found that the processor + motherboard + RAM is finicky & originally led to many strange program crashes, etc. In that particular case I figured out that I had to clock down the bus from 133mhz to something like 119mhz in order to not get any memtest errors, which itself was sneaky b/c the memtest errors would only come up on the 6th or 7th round of memtest. System runs stable now.

This has got slightly off-topic, maybe I should start another thread, but re potential RAM probs: Not had a chance to use Memtest yet, but I did try each of the 3 RAM sticks individually and they all got Doc Watson coming up, on those web pages. 2 x Kingston 128mb and 1 x Crucial 64mb. My test makes it far less likely memory probs are the cause of Doc Watson, right? Unless all 3 sticks are faulty.

Aiming a fan at a heatsink isn't the same as a proper heatsink/fan combination. Celeron 333s didn't really need active fan combos but the 550 and 600MHz P3 were designed to use an active heatsink/fan combination.

Okay Fred, thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Chrome 149.0.7827.156 (offline installer) by Razvan Serea The web browser is arguably the most important piece of software on your computer. You spend much of your time online inside a browser: when you search, chat, email, shop, bank, read the news, and watch videos online, you often do all this using a browser. Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology to make the web faster, safer, and easier. Use one box for everything--type in the address bar and get suggestions for both search and Web pages. Thumbnails of your top sites let you access your favorite pages instantly with lightning speed from any new tab. Desktop shortcuts allow you to launch your favorite Web apps straight from your desktop. Chrome has many useful features built in, including automatic full-page translation and access to thousands of apps, extensions, and themes from the Chrome Web Store. Google Chrome is one of the best solutions for Internet browsing giving you high level of security, speed and great features. This update includes 33 security fixes. [N/A][516496659] Critical CVE-2026-12437: Use after free in WebShare. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516947912] Critical CVE-2026-12438: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][519728275] Critical CVE-2026-12439: Use after free in Digital Credentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][519731619] Critical CVE-2026-12440: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520157118] Critical CVE-2026-12441: Use after free in File Input. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521950423] Critical CVE-2026-12442: Use after free in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 [N/A][522566295] Critical CVE-2026-12443: Use after free in Web Authentication. Reported by Google on 2026-06-11 [N/A][513160088] High CVE-2026-12444: Out of bounds read in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513199795] High CVE-2026-12445: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513313107] High CVE-2026-12446: Insufficient data validation in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-14 [N/A][513405023] High CVE-2026-12447: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513458233] High CVE-2026-12448: Inappropriate implementation in WebView. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][513480539] High CVE-2026-12449: Use after free in Chromoting. Reported by Google on 2026-05-15 [N/A][514531776] High CVE-2026-12450: Inappropriate implementation in Media. Reported by Zhixin Tu on 2026-05-19 [N/A][514741076] High CVE-2026-12451: Use after free in DigitalCredentials. Reported by Google on 2026-05-19 [N/A][515462244] High CVE-2026-12452: Use after free in Downloads. Reported by Google on 2026-05-21 [N/A][516448843] High CVE-2026-12453: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Input. Reported by Google on 2026-05-25 [N/A][516926968] High CVE-2026-12454: Race in Safe Browsing. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517069848] High CVE-2026-12455: Use after free in Tab Strip. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517124587] High CVE-2026-12456: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517153117] High CVE-2026-12457: Insufficient data validation in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517258337] High CVE-2026-12458: Incorrect security UI in Passwords. Reported by Google on 2026-05-27 [N/A][517406035] High CVE-2026-12459: Inappropriate implementation in Serial. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517484284] High CVE-2026-12460: Insufficient policy enforcement in File System Access. Reported by Google on 2026-05-28 [N/A][517727318] High CVE-2026-12461: Out of bounds read in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][517916024] High CVE-2026-12462: Use after free in Media. Reported by Google on 2026-05-29 [N/A][518042749] High CVE-2026-12463: Inappropriate implementation in Views. Reported by Google on 2026-05-30 [N/A][519358344] High CVE-2026-12464: Use after free in Browser. Reported by Google on 2026-06-03 [N/A][520189702] High CVE-2026-12465: Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Metrics. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520199394] High CVE-2026-12466: Heap buffer overflow in WebRTC. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][520202726] High CVE-2026-12467: Use after free in Extensions. Reported by Google on 2026-06-05 [N/A][521485244] High CVE-2026-12468: Inappropriate implementation in Updater. Reported by Google on 2026-06-08 [N/A][521618871] High CVE-2026-12469: Uninitialized Use in GPU. Reported by Google on 2026-06-09 Important to know! The offline installer links do not include the automatic update feature. Download web installer: Google Chrome Web 32-bit | Google Chrome 64-bit | Freeware Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 64-bit | Direct Link | 131.0 MB Download: Google Chrome Offline Installer 32-bit | Direct Link | 119.0 MB Download page: Google Chrome Portable Download: Chrome ARM64 | Direct Link View: Chrome Website | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • they couldnt do W11 LTSC so the support lasts longer....
    • The fact that the pref is not enabled by default tells you that what you see is what you get...for now. Hopefully the final version will have all the quirks ironed out.
    • It's enterprise, not consumer. And "...affected scenarios involve third-party software..." Would be good to know that in headline, not way down in the article. Instead, you lead with Windows update, which is not very helpful and misleading, IMHO. Just saying.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!