Thermal Paste needed for Slot 1 CPU?


Recommended Posts

I?ve ordered a Pentium 3 550mhz (SL3F7), minus heatsink. I already have a 600mhz (SL3JM) version siting around, that never worked properly, that has attached a large passive heatsink. I had to modify this h/s, cutting off the ends, so that CPU could be seated in the slot (it still only mounted adequately, not 100% securely). Anyway, question is: if I swap that h/s onto the 550, do I need then to use any thermal paste between CPU and sink? There?s a white plastic looking patch on the h/s where it mounts to the CPU.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/847680-thermal-paste-needed-for-slot-1-cpu/
Share on other sites

Most of the people on this board are probably not old enough to remember the P3 :-p

The white plastic thermal pad should be cleaned off and new thermal paste applied between the CPU and the heat sink. I would probably recommend using a fan, as I'm not sure a passive HS is adequate for a P3 550. I had a room with two P3 1 GHz PCs and an Athlon 733 MHz at one point and remember it being quite a hot room.

Sounds like cotton swabs and alcohol is the ideal way to clean the old paste off:

http://www.overclock.net/amd-cpus/335074-b...-paste-off.html

Hope this helps!

Very helpful, cheers! I drew a blank from a local hardware store and chemist, for those cleaners mentioned in that link. I removed the white pad from the h/s using my thumbnail and Auto Glym Engine & Machine Cleaner ?basically a ?powerful water-based biodegradable degreaser?. I?m reluctant to try that on the CPU. I?ll try again for something more appropriate tomorrow, unless you think I can get away with the Auto Glym cleaner?

I?ve got some Arctic Ceramic, that would be okay to use as thermal paste?

Perhaps the 600MHz CPU never worked well because it was using just a passive heat sink.

Incidentally, back in the P3 days, I typically just used contact without any fancy thermal pastes to attach and active heat sink/fan to a slot1 P3.

These days, the thermal paste may cost more than the CPU.

The 600 booted up fine, and I could use various programmes, but FireFox crashed if you visited various web pages. FF had to be used as the browser, so I dumped the 600.

That just sounds to me like it needs a proper heatsink/fan combo. It's designed to be 600/100 but how well does it run at 400MHz (400/66). It should be locked at 6x.

Very helpful, cheers! I drew a blank from a local hardware store and chemist, for those cleaners mentioned in that link. I removed the white pad from the h/s using my thumbnail and Auto Glym Engine & Machine Cleaner ?basically a ?powerful water-based biodegradable degreaser?. I?m reluctant to try that on the CPU. I?ll try again for something more appropriate tomorrow, unless you think I can get away with the Auto Glym cleaner?

Honestly, I would avoid things like that altogether. You want something that is completely pure and that won't leave behind any sort of residue. Ideally something like isopropyl alcohol (but not things like nail-polish remover, because that has additives), although acetone will also work extremely well provided the surfaces are metal. Heat spreaders and sinks usually are, but going from memory I think most of the slot 1 boards expose the processor directly and don't have a heat spreader, and so could potentially be damaged by acetone. Go with isopropyl alcohol, and give the heat sink a going over as well, in case the automotive cleaner left anything behind.

Provided the heat sink and processor physically touch, any HTC compound should be fine. I don't know what that particular Arctic product is, but it'll probably be fine.

Thanks for everyones advice.

That just sounds to me like it needs a proper heatsink/fan combo. It's designed to be 600/100 but how well does it run at 400MHz (400/66). It should be locked at 6x.
But why didn't the whole system crash, if you're suggesting the CPU thermally shut down? It was just FF that crashed and only on certain web pages, always the same pages. I'll see if it runs at 400.

Well the 550 isn?t working either. Just like the 600, it boots fine, and no problem with other programs, and no problem with most sites FireFox visits, apart from a few where ?Doctor Watson for Windows NT? interrupts things with: ?an application error has occurred and an application error log is being generated. FireFox exe.?

It?s not overheating, I aimed a fan at it.

According to this site, these CPU's should work with my P2B rev 1.10:

http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/p2...pgrade_faq.html

I was thinking maybe one last chance and get the 400 version of the Celeron 333, that it?s already running.

Edited by Deisel Weisel

Isopropyl Alcohol works well to clean

Arctic MX-2/3 is great paste.. Its like Arctic silver 5 but without the set in time

Two different processors, but the same problem.... Sounds to me like you're barking up the wrong tree. I would re-think my diagnosis if I were you.

I'm thinking he should run Memtest and test his memory for defects.

Two different processors, but the same problem.... Sounds to me like you're barking up the wrong tree. I would re-think my diagnosis if I were you.

+1

If the only issue you're seeing is Firefox crashing on certain webpages, that would not suggest a processor issue. Sounds more like a software issue, but it's hard to say without getting the full picture (system specs, OS, Firefox version, etc).

I'm thinking he should run Memtest and test his memory for defects.
The current Celeron 333 works fine. Maybe Pentium uses the memory slightly differently. Maybe I'll try that Memtest when I have time. Thanks.
+1

If the only issue you're seeing is Firefox crashing on certain webpages, that would not suggest a processor issue. Sounds more like a software issue, but it's hard to say without getting the full picture (system specs, OS, Firefox version, etc).

Okay, I'll list the spec later.
I'm thinking he should run Memtest and test his memory for defects.

Memtest is a good idea, you should aim for 10 rounds without any errors.

I built a PIII 667 based computer & found that the processor + motherboard + RAM is finicky & originally led to many strange program crashes, etc. In that particular case I figured out that I had to clock down the bus from 133mhz to something like 119mhz in order to not get any memtest errors, which itself was sneaky b/c the memtest errors would only come up on the 6th or 7th round of memtest. System runs stable now.

This has got slightly off-topic, maybe I should start another thread, but re potential RAM probs: Not had a chance to use Memtest yet, but I did try each of the 3 RAM sticks individually and they all got Doc Watson coming up, on those web pages. 2 x Kingston 128mb and 1 x Crucial 64mb. My test makes it far less likely memory probs are the cause of Doc Watson, right? Unless all 3 sticks are faulty.

Aiming a fan at a heatsink isn't the same as a proper heatsink/fan combination. Celeron 333s didn't really need active fan combos but the 550 and 600MHz P3 were designed to use an active heatsink/fan combination.

Okay Fred, thanks.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft Edge 149.0.4022.80 by Razvan Serea Microsoft Edge is a super fast and secure web browser from Microsoft. It works on almost any device, including PCs, iPhones and Androids. It keeps you safe online, protects your privacy, and lets you browse the web quickly. You can even use it on all your devices and keep your browsing history and favorites synced up. Built on the same technology as Chrome, Microsoft Edge has additional built-in features like Startup boost and Sleeping tabs, which boost your browsing experience with world class performance and speed that are optimized to work best with Windows. Microsoft Edge security and privacy features such as Microsoft Defender SmartScreen, Password Monitor, InPrivate search, and Kids Mode help keep you and your loved ones protected and secure online. Microsoft Edge has features to keep both you and your family protected. Enable content filters and access activity reports with your Microsoft Family Safety account and experience a kid-friendly web with Kids Mode. The new Microsoft Edge is now compatible with your favorite extensions, so it’s easy to personalize your browsing experience. Microsoft Edge 149.0.4022.80 changelog: Fixes Fixed an issue that prevented QR code generation from working. Feature updates Intune MAM Protected Downloads. The protected downloads feature for Intune MAM will now save downloaded files to the Documents > Microsoft Edge > Downloads folder in OneDrive. Extensions monitoring in the Edge management service. The Microsoft Edge management service now allows admins to gain visibility into extensions installed across their managed users. From the extensions monitoring page, admins can see which extensions have been installed as well as manage user requests for blocked extensions. For more information, see Microsoft Edge Extensions Monitoring. Validate Edge builds early with enterprise preview. Enterprise preview provides a simpler way for admins to flight pre-release Edge builds to their users. To reduce friction and bolster usage, users will receive pre-release builds directly inside of their Stable Edge application. Admins can allow users to easily opt-out of the preview experience, using built-in rollback to switch between their pre-release and stable channels with ease. Microsoft 365 admin center users can configure the feature, view their flighting population, and receive personalized recommendations all in one place. For more information, see Get started with Enterprise Preview in Microsoft Edge. Download: Microsoft Edge (64-bit) | 193.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Microsoft Edge (32-bit) | 170.0 MB Download: Microsoft Edge (ARM64) | 188.0 MB View: Microsoft Edge Website | Release History Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!