Is my PC really that old?


Recommended Posts

I've been happily getting along with the latest system I built, which I admit has been quite a while ago. However I still considered it a very fast system and was surprised when a friend of mine started making a big deal about how ancient it was and wondering why on earth I hadn't upgraded. So anyway, as I type this I'm running the following:

Intel Celeron 335 (Celeron D)

Prescott core, Socket 478

1GB DDR SDRAM

Geforce X1600

Windows XP SP3

My system is quite snappy and responsive, and everything I run works fine so I'm in no hurry to upgrade. Really though, would a Core 2 Duo really be that much faster, or is it just a pointless upgrade people do so they have the best? Personally I don't think I need it but I was wondering what everyone else thought.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/847830-is-my-pc-really-that-old/
Share on other sites

The hard drive is a Seagate 320GB SATA. Anyway as I said it feels fast enough to me, everything opens instantly and even HD videos play smoothly. When someone says ancient PC I always think of a Pentium Pro or 486. :laugh:

The only difference between the Celeron D 478 and Pentium 4 is the reduced cache, and at the time it was the best price/performance purchase available for me.

A modern Core 2 system is faster, but it's pretty meaningless unless you actually use the extra performance. I take it that you probably do not run many heavy applications or games, which means upgrading would just be a waste of money.

That was my thinking, I'm not so much into games anymore. Plus if I upgrade now it means basically a whole new PC since AGP, DDR1, etc have all been replaced. Too much money for far too little benefit I think. I'll probably add more RAM in the future and maybe even pick up a cheap P4 for a few bucks but for now I'm satisfied with it. :)

That was my thinking, I'm not so much into games anymore. Plus if I upgrade now it means basically a whole new PC since AGP, DDR1, etc have all been replaced. Too much money for far too little benefit I think. I'll probably add more RAM in the future and maybe even pick up a cheap P4 for a few bucks but for now I'm satisfied with it. :)

I think upgrading it would be a bigger waste of money unless you are getting the parts really cheap somewhere because old parts are usually overpriced.

yes, it's old.

Does it matter? Nope

When I was in the computer business I always told the customer that the age didn't matter. It's what you did with the machine that mattered.

It's like having a porche and never taking it out of first gear.

Who cares how fast it is if you don't use it to it's full potential. (which most people wouldn't)

Rule of thumb. If it does what you want it to and you're happy with the way it runs then why worry about it.

People that tell you that you need to upgrade are usually geeks and young kids who haven't lost their virginity yet.

yes, it's old.

Does it matter? Nope

When I was in the computer business I always told the customer that the age didn't matter. It's what you did with the machine that mattered.

It's like having a porche and never taking it out of first gear.

Who cares how fast it is if you don't use it to it's full potential. (which most people wouldn't)

Rule of thumb. If it does what you want it to and you're happy with the way it runs then why worry about it.

People that tell you that you need to upgrade are usually geeks and young kids who haven't lost their virginity yet.

that made me laugh XD

i am young and virgin

if that machine works for you, keep it as-is. no point in upgrading if you don't see any need for it.

i remember my old i845 box. 2.8GHz P4 800FSB running at 2.1GHz 400FSB, a 250GB hard drive, dual 60GB hard drives, (all 3 IDE) a DVD burner, 768MB memory, 128MB PCI video card, and dual 15 inch LCDs. ran XP like a dream at the time (about 11 months ago) but just got to the point where it was becoming sluggish and lacking under my ever-increasing demands. the time was right and i spent $250 on a dual-core TigerDirect kit computer, which became part of my current machine. which is still "low-end", but i like it the way it is :)

and don't let anyone put you down for having such low specs. seriously, if it's performance keeps you happy then thats all that matters!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!