Is my PC really that old?


Recommended Posts

I've been happily getting along with the latest system I built, which I admit has been quite a while ago. However I still considered it a very fast system and was surprised when a friend of mine started making a big deal about how ancient it was and wondering why on earth I hadn't upgraded. So anyway, as I type this I'm running the following:

Intel Celeron 335 (Celeron D)

Prescott core, Socket 478

1GB DDR SDRAM

Geforce X1600

Windows XP SP3

My system is quite snappy and responsive, and everything I run works fine so I'm in no hurry to upgrade. Really though, would a Core 2 Duo really be that much faster, or is it just a pointless upgrade people do so they have the best? Personally I don't think I need it but I was wondering what everyone else thought.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/847830-is-my-pc-really-that-old/
Share on other sites

The hard drive is a Seagate 320GB SATA. Anyway as I said it feels fast enough to me, everything opens instantly and even HD videos play smoothly. When someone says ancient PC I always think of a Pentium Pro or 486. :laugh:

The only difference between the Celeron D 478 and Pentium 4 is the reduced cache, and at the time it was the best price/performance purchase available for me.

A modern Core 2 system is faster, but it's pretty meaningless unless you actually use the extra performance. I take it that you probably do not run many heavy applications or games, which means upgrading would just be a waste of money.

That was my thinking, I'm not so much into games anymore. Plus if I upgrade now it means basically a whole new PC since AGP, DDR1, etc have all been replaced. Too much money for far too little benefit I think. I'll probably add more RAM in the future and maybe even pick up a cheap P4 for a few bucks but for now I'm satisfied with it. :)

That was my thinking, I'm not so much into games anymore. Plus if I upgrade now it means basically a whole new PC since AGP, DDR1, etc have all been replaced. Too much money for far too little benefit I think. I'll probably add more RAM in the future and maybe even pick up a cheap P4 for a few bucks but for now I'm satisfied with it. :)

I think upgrading it would be a bigger waste of money unless you are getting the parts really cheap somewhere because old parts are usually overpriced.

yes, it's old.

Does it matter? Nope

When I was in the computer business I always told the customer that the age didn't matter. It's what you did with the machine that mattered.

It's like having a porche and never taking it out of first gear.

Who cares how fast it is if you don't use it to it's full potential. (which most people wouldn't)

Rule of thumb. If it does what you want it to and you're happy with the way it runs then why worry about it.

People that tell you that you need to upgrade are usually geeks and young kids who haven't lost their virginity yet.

yes, it's old.

Does it matter? Nope

When I was in the computer business I always told the customer that the age didn't matter. It's what you did with the machine that mattered.

It's like having a porche and never taking it out of first gear.

Who cares how fast it is if you don't use it to it's full potential. (which most people wouldn't)

Rule of thumb. If it does what you want it to and you're happy with the way it runs then why worry about it.

People that tell you that you need to upgrade are usually geeks and young kids who haven't lost their virginity yet.

that made me laugh XD

i am young and virgin

if that machine works for you, keep it as-is. no point in upgrading if you don't see any need for it.

i remember my old i845 box. 2.8GHz P4 800FSB running at 2.1GHz 400FSB, a 250GB hard drive, dual 60GB hard drives, (all 3 IDE) a DVD burner, 768MB memory, 128MB PCI video card, and dual 15 inch LCDs. ran XP like a dream at the time (about 11 months ago) but just got to the point where it was becoming sluggish and lacking under my ever-increasing demands. the time was right and i spent $250 on a dual-core TigerDirect kit computer, which became part of my current machine. which is still "low-end", but i like it the way it is :)

and don't let anyone put you down for having such low specs. seriously, if it's performance keeps you happy then thats all that matters!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, While ~104 GB of space may seem generous (at least compared to other e-readers which have 8-32GB), I feel at this price point the device should have a Micro SDXC card slot for expansion, particularly if it allows audio books to be installed and played. I hope to see more reviews of 6" phone-sized e-readers on Neowin in the future. It will be interesting to see how they compare. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 by Razvan Serea Run programs in a sandbox to prevent malware from making permanent changes to your PC. Sandboxie allows you to run your browser, or any other program, so that all changes that result from the usage are kept in a sandbox environment, which can then be deleted later. Sandboxie is a sandbox-based isolation software for 32- and 64-bit Windows NT-based operating systems. It is being developed by David Xanatos since it became open source, before that it was developed by Sophos (which acquired it from Invincea, which acquired it earlier from the original author Ronen Tzur). It creates a sandbox-like isolated operating environment in which applications can be run or installed without permanently modifying the local or mapped drive. An isolated virtual environment allows controlled testing of untrusted programs and web surfing. Sandboxie is available in two flavors Plus and Classic. Both have the same core components, this means they have the same level of security and compatibility. What's different is the user interface the Plus build has a modern Qt based UI which supports all new features that have been added since the project went open source. The Classic build has the old no longer developed MFC based UI, hence it lacks support for modern features, these features can however still be used when manually configured in the Sandboxie.ini. Sandboxie Plus 1.17.8 / Classic 5.72.8 release notes: Added added DisableCustomTitleOpt=[process,][y|n] to allow [#] sandboxie title markers on custom-titlebar windows (Delphi VCL, Qt, Electron) that were previously skipped to prevent DWM repaint CPU loops #5387 Changed updated bundled ImDisk driver to 3.0.2 #5419 Fixed fix Suppress logs for expected non-user SIDs #5422 SbieSvc.exe: SBIE2218/2219 error when run program as administrator #5417 fixed explorer.exe crashes in Application Compartment when Huorong Security is installed #5423 Download: Sandboxie Plus (64-bit) | 23.5 MB (Open Source) Download: Sandboxie Classic (64-bit) | 3.0 MB Links: Sandboxie Website | GitHub | ARM64 | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hello, Christian Maas' XVI32 is a nice (and very small) hex editor. Speaking of hex editors, many years ago a colleague and I who both worked at Tribal Voice managed to edit a copy of the company's PowWow instant messaging client to make it behave better now that all of its lookup servers and other server-side tech was gone.  The program didn't support NAT (RFC-3022 was introduced in January 2001, the same time Tribal Voice was shuttered), but it still worked okay if you manually set up port-forwarding on your router.  The server at http://powwow.jazy.net/ hosts a copy (usual warnings about downloading and running untrusted code from random internet servers apply). I occasionally use some tools like Funduc Software's Search and Replace and Application Mover when I need to make mass-edits to text-based files or move programs with a hard-coded installation directories, respectively.  When I need to figure out the exact LCD panel inside of a laptop, EnTech Taiwan's Monitor Asset Manager is my go-to tool for that purpose. JD Design's website (now hosted on github.io) has a number of interesting freeware and shareware utilities.  I used to use their TouchPro utility to set the file timestamps on software I was mastering to match its version number (e.g., version 3.00 of a program had all of its files dates set to 3:00AM, and so forth). Karenware has a number of interesting freeware utilities, too. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • I still use HexChat! Not really as ancient as the 1994 AutoCAD above my post, but I have never found anything better to replace it. Yes we still operate an IRC server https://www.neowin.net/irc/ 😛 
    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!