Recommend me a 22/24" monitor and a powered USB hub


Recommended Posts

At the moment I have a 17" monitor that serves a purpose, but only to a certain extent. I'm looking to spend ?150 - ?200 on a new monitor to hook up to my MacBook and Xbox 360. I want a well built, 1920x1080/1200 monitor with a decent response time. The only reason I'm really asking about this is because I been fairly withdrawn from recent technological updates.

So far I've found a few I like:

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct....510&subcat=

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct....rodid=MO-118-SA

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct....949&subcat=

Really I'm having trouble telling the difference between monitors... is the extra ?40 really worth it to go from the P2250 to the P2350?

On an unrelated note I'm also looking for a new powered USB hub. Currently I have a "trust" 7-port powered hub, but devices (most usually my external HDD) cut out sometimes, which is a pain.

Thanks for any help you can gi:) :)

For those three prices, I only would be looking at 22" or 24".

If you are not in a hurry and can save for the 24" that would be great.

This way, you will end up with a more bigger display for the years to come. As the difference is not that much, you may feel regret about going for the 22". And regret is not good when forking out money for something you bought.

Let us know when you make a decision.

For those three prices, I only would be looking at 22" or 24".

If you are not in a hurry and can save for the 24" that would be great.

This way, you will end up with a more bigger display for the years to come. As the difference is not that much, you may feel regret about going for the 22". And regret is not good when forking out money for something you bought.

Let us know when you make a decision.

I don't mind spending a little over ?200, so 24" is within my range - right now I'm just wondering whether the one inch more on this one makes up for the better response time/contrast ratio of the P2350.

I don't mind spending a little over ?200, so 24" is within my range - right now I'm just wondering whether the one inch more on this one makes up for the better response time/contrast ratio of the P2350.

I think that response times differences between 2 and 5ms are somehow negligible.

If you watch a lot of video in your computer (good or high quality video, not Youtube or music videos) you may consider going to a local store and see the difference between contrast ratios.

My LG 22" has 5000:1 and movies or games look great with very good (although not outstanding) black levels.

That choice is about personal preference but I would go for the bigger one.

http://accessories.euro.dell.com/sna/produ...&sku=193757

23" Dell 2048 x 1152 resolution and 4 port USB hub (I suppose it's powered, but not 100% sure). ?175.20 incl. VAT & shipping.

Wow, that is ridiculously good:DD

Why is it so cheap?!

Thank you very much - I think this is the one for me:))

The HP LP2475w is pretty much the best 24" monitor. It has an S-IPS panel, supports 1080p, usb ports, and ton of other connections.

I've got one and have my PC and PS3 both hooked up to it. Very good monitor.

Looks nice, but sadly it's a tad out of my range.

I think that response times differences between 2 and 5ms are somehow negligible.

If you watch a lot of video in your computer (good or high quality video, not Youtube or music videos) you may consider going to a local store and see the difference between contrast ratios.

My LG 22" has 5000:1 and movies or games look great with very good (although not outstanding) black levels.

That choice is about personal preference but I would go for the bigger one.

Thanks for all the help - I doubt I'd notice 3ms tbh, but the Dell mentioned above has 2ms and is bigger, so I'm quids in :)

Sorry to be so indecisive, but what are people's opinions on getting a 22" Ultrasharp 2209WA (which has the disadvantage of being 1680x1050, but is eIPS/presumably a higher quality monitor, with a height adjustable/pivotable stand) over the SP2039W (the resolution of which is fairly redundant as for the forseeable future I'll be using a MacBook with a max. external display output of 1920x1200). Although the 2209WA is marked as ~?300 on the Dell website, it's available for ?200 elsewhere.

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct....rodid=MO-071-VS

I'm just tossing that one in there in case it might be of some help.

A friend just bought that, and although the panel is good, the stand is flimsy and it feels quite cheap - otherwise it would be ideal :)

I'm just wondering what the differences are (other than resolution) between Samsung's SW and BW ranges. Currently I'm leaning towards the SM2333SW and the P2350. I've had good experiences with Samsung in the past (though this is probably among the worst reasons to go for a monitor) and these two seem to be amongst the best in terms of quality/specifications/price.

I've given up on the SP2309W - its resolution would be fairly redundant for me, and I'm not a fan of its styling.

Ahh I understand why you'd want to avoid the Viewsonic then. I may get it for myself as I need something with a nice, vibrant display but also within a nice, low budget.

I'd recommend the P2350 personally. Higher contrast ratio, better response time (although the difference between 2 and 5ms isn't great, if noticeable). Unless I'm missing other important technical details.

Ahh I understand why you'd want to avoid the Viewsonic then. I may get it for myself as I need something with a nice, vibrant display but also within a nice, low budget.

I'd recommend the P2350 personally. Higher contrast ratio, better response time (although the difference between 2 and 5ms isn't great, if noticeable). Unless I'm missing other important technical details.

Thanks very much :)

Definitely ordering the P2350 :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!