What is the 100mb partition Windows 7 SOMETMES creates on install?


Recommended Posts

Windows 7 sometimes automatically asks to create a 100mb partition for system files on startup.

Can anybody tell me just what exactly this partition is? Whats on it? And why sometimes it creates it, and sometimes it doesn't? I've installed Windows 7 on a few systems now, and it seems to be random, what causes it to install and to NOT install this partition? And whats on it? Would it be better to have this partition or not?

Would upgrading from a previous version of Windows but doing a clean install create this partition?

How about installing on a drive that already has existing partitions?

Windows 7 sometimes automatically asks to create a 100mb partition for system files on startup.

Can anybody tell me just what exactly this partition is? Whats on it? And why sometimes it creates it, and sometimes it doesn't? I've installed Windows 7 on a few systems now, and it seems to be random, what causes it to install and to NOT install this partition? And whats on it? Would it be better to have this partition or not?

Would upgrading from a previous version of Windows but doing a clean install create this partition?

How about installing on a drive that already has existing partitions?

It contains boot files and recovery info & If you delete it you will no longer be able to boot you computer

I think it's only created by Ultimate and Business, and only when you install on a bare unpartitioned drive.

Nope, not at all. It's created for the reasons the others mentioned.

He's part right. It is the default system partition created only on empty drives. It holds the boot loader and BitLocker files (if enabled. because you couldn't boot from an encrypted partition) and clearly separates the system partition (which holds the boot loader) from the boot partition (which holds the OS).

If you already have partitions, it will normally make the first NTFS partition on the disk the system partition instead.

It does not contain any recovery stuff, that is located on the boot volumes of the OSes installed (it is OS-dependent and too large to fit on a 100MB partition).

It places it on completely empty computers. If you have another hard drive with a boot sector and another version of windows installed it does not create it.

My friend's laptop had Vista installed, I was helping him install an upgrade version of Win 7, I told it to delete the Vista partition and use the entire drive, it added the 100mb partition.

I usually delete all the partitions then recreate then (about 80 GB each, during the install). Or if the hdd hasnt been formatted yet, I just create the separate partitions. It probably couldnt create the 100mb, even if it wanted to. Well, I cant see any 100mb partitions on this

My friend's laptop had Vista installed, I was helping him install an upgrade version of Win 7, I told it to delete the Vista partition and use the entire drive, it added the 100mb partition.

Exactly, because when you tell it to use the entire drive, it is dealing with an empty drive that it can do whatever it wants to. If there is something else on it, it can't. If people don't want the partition, the best way to avoid it is to manually create your own partition through the installer and then install to that rather then just clicking next/telling it to use the entire drive.

My friend's laptop had Vista installed, I was helping him install an upgrade version of Win 7, I told it to delete the Vista partition and use the entire drive, it added the 100mb partition.

In this instance you told it to clear the computer and then install Windows 7.

If your Vista install was on another hard drive with a boot sector of its own, and then you told it to install on another drive leaving Vista in its place it would not have created the 100mb partition.

In this instance you told it to clear the computer and then install Windows 7.

If your Vista install was on another hard drive with a boot sector of its own, and then you told it to install on another drive leaving Vista in its place it would not have created the 100mb partition.

I see.

Because both the systems I want to install it on have existing partitions.

My Mac Mini will of course have a MACOS partition, and my laptop already has a Ubuntu and OpenSUSE partition.

So I won't be able to get this 100mb system partition on either of them? I know I can delete the Vista partition on my laptop when I install Windows 7 but im not sure if its ok to delete the Windows partition that Boot Camp makes on my Mac Mini when installing windows.

The correct answer for this is because of:

You have one of a few things enabled or maybee all (not that you, yourself enabled it)

1 ) Computer motherboard chipset is set to AHCI in the bios

2) You have a EFI motherboard which the 100MB will store drivers and other data theoretically, not in use very much yet. Not even on a apple machine. Only x86 hackers have made use of this in mainstream

3) Some manufacturers make a system reserved parition with data which is usally a few gigs, since you said it was 100MB only so this is not correct, just a possible use

4) You bios does not have ACHI enabled but the system manufacturer may have used an image with ACHI enabled while cloning drives and you machine gets it by default which would not effect your system from booting... i think

5) This does not have to do with your MBR, as a GUID disk or a MBR formatted disk both will get the 100MB if AHCI is enabled

it will be answer ONE most likley, you can reformat the drive and delete the partition but if ACHI is enabled in the bios it will put the 100MB back everytime.

I can not tell your exact reason for having it with out the PC in front of me but its ONLY the options above. The reason it exist in GENERAL is because its a 100MB parition to be used as a boot loader. As of now not many companies use.

Apple or Microsoft can make use of them but they dont as of now really.

Recent or future used of the 100MB EFI/SYSTEM partition are

1) OSX86 Drivers that site in the EFI until after OSX loads, then OSX will load all drivers in the EFI parition while leaving the OSX install 100% unmodified. This how the OSX86 people get the software update to work as the OSX install is untouched.

Bootloader use

2) Digital Cable Tuner Hack

Loads the bios and OCUR hack and smooshes together to make a hacked OCUR BIOS that the ATI DCT digital cable card reader can use so you watch Digtal Cable on your PC with out the OEM requirement.

Bootloader use, also Microsoft just released an update to Windows 7 in which you no longer need this "Media Center has a new Digital Cable Advisor" which will eliminate the need for this hack and now sizpack joe can have a Cable Card in his PC as like 2-3 weeks ago.

3) Microsoft I heard will be using this parition for Bitlocker Encryption data

Again yet bootloader use.

You gain nothing be deleting it expect 100MB back, with all the possible REAL uses of it I would advise to leave it esp with how much hard drive space people have now a days. I am all for not wasting hard disk space but this has many reasons to keep it.

Cheers

Edited by 1Way Jonny
I see.

Because both the systems I want to install it on have existing partitions.

My Mac Mini will of course have a MACOS partition, and my laptop already has a Ubuntu and OpenSUSE partition.

So I won't be able to get this 100mb system partition on either of them? I know I can delete the Vista partition on my laptop when I install Windows 7 but im not sure if its ok to delete the Windows partition that Boot Camp makes on my Mac Mini when installing windows.

Your mac is EFI enabled with ACHI by default, you do have a 100MB parition called EFI (if you havent seen it), your Windows parition does not see it as its already there for your OSX install and also that your mac uses a custom boot loader while working with the EFI BIOS to boot your windows setup.

You gain nothing be deleting it expect 100MB back, with all the possible REAL uses of it I would advise to leave it esp with how much hard drive space people have now a days. I am all for not wasting hard disk space but this has many reasons to keep it.

On your average system it serves no real purpose. All it has on it is a few megabytes of boot loader files. If you did delete it, you'd have to install the boot loader on the boot partition instead and set that active. Possible, but not really worth the hassle. If you don't want it, manually partition the drive during installation. It's that simple.

On your average system it serves no real purpose. All it has on it is a few megabytes of boot loader files. If you did delete it, you'd have to install the boot loader on the boot partition instead and set that active. Possible, but not really worth the hassle. If you don't want it, manually partition the drive during installation. It's that simple.

Don't do that. Windows creates a separate boot partition for a reason. Lots of other OSes do the same thing. Don't mess with it.

The correct answer for this is because of:

Err, no. The Windows boot partition has nothing to do with the GPT Protective Partition found on most EFI / GPT systems (like Macs), nor is it related to the EISA or other recovery partitions provided by various OEMs.

It is more comparable to the common "/boot" partition created by some Linux installers.

My Mac always uses a 200mb EFI partition, and the 64bit Windows Vista and 7 are EFI enabled OS's if the hardware supports it anyway

and the windows 7 installer is now notifying us that it is going to do this so "WE" the consumers don't keep asking on forums "Where is the last 100mb of my clean install on this HDD" where as before it did it anyway without you ever knowing it happened

Don't do that. Windows creates a separate boot partition for a reason.

Like I said, I wouldn't bother doing it because it's an irrelevant amount of space. I'm just pointing out that if you really want to save the 100MB, you're better off doing it during the installation. I think you're exaggerating slightly when you say "don't do that" though. Other than make it harder to accidentally delete the boot loader, I don't see what it offers your average PC user.

Lots of other OSes do the same thing. Don't mess with it.

Do they? I can't think of any that do. No Linux distribution that I've tried do, FreeBSD doesn't, and, well, what other OSes are left that have any relevance today. I don't think it's common at all to have the boot loader on a separate partition.

It'd be great if people could cite sources from Microsoft.

I don't have any but from researching last time I thought I found out that it held the recovery data. Not the GBs worths that you find on an OEM computer with the ability to "reformat" and reinstall as was when bought but what you boot in to when your computer doesn't boot that holds the necessary tools to repair a computer such as diskpart, etc.

It could make sense that this only appears in Ultimate as my copy at home has it but my laptop (Professional) doesn't for BitLocker.

I really can't be arsed looking for sources as this is just from memory but it'd be great if people debating would to arrive at a proper conclusion.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!