what does AD means ?


Recommended Posts

Anybody understand calender thingies better ?

What does AD means ?

I guess ..AD = After Death of Christ.

The reason I am asking , I found a text written as..In the Buddhist year of 1974 ( 1421 AD )....

Does 1974 = 1421 AD ...really ? whats the math here ?

A.D. means Anno Domini.

"Refers to the traditionally reckoned year of the conception or birth of Jesus, with AD denoting years after the start of this epoch, and BC denoting years before the start of this epoch. There is no year zero in this scheme, so the year AD 1 immediately follows the year 1 BC." - Wikipedia

So, the Buddhist year of 1974 would be 1421 C.E. (Common Era, or A.D.: Anno Domini), and the 'math' that you are looking for is:

2009-1421 = 588 years.

Therefore, whatever you are reading occurred 588 years before 2009, our current year.

As pointed out by The_Decryptor, not everybody in the world uses the calendar that we are familiar with.

Its still pretty confusing thing.

Ok, let me say what i get .

We have various Calender Systems....Most of the countries in the world uses Gregorian calendar ....but still there are some countries where Buddhist_calendar is used ( Example Thailand).

Now , when we say 1421 AD ..I believe this does not come under the above two Calender ...right ? So, we have to convert it to our familiar Calender ....right ?

If that is so, whats 1421 AD in Gregorian calendar ?

A.D. means Anno Domini.

"Refers to the traditionally reckoned year of the conception or birth of Jesus, with AD denoting years after the start of this epoch, and BC denoting years before the start of this epoch. There is no year zero in this scheme, so the year AD 1 immediately follows the year 1 BC." - Wikipedia

So, the Buddhist year of 1974 would be 1421 C.E. (Common Era, or A.D., Anno Domini), and the 'math' that you are looking for is:

2009-1421 = 588 years.

Therefore, whatever you are reading occurred 588 years before 2009, our current year.

As pointed out by The_Decryptor, not everybody in the world uses the calendar that we are familiar with.

Thanks for the information ... that was a hell lot of nice stuffs !

but still, I am not clear with this AD & BC stuff.

do you means AD 's are counted after the birth of Christ ? So, if I say 5 AD ...does that mean the concerned year we are talking is 5 year after the birth of Christ ? Am i correct now ?

Its still pretty confusing thing.

Ok, let me say what i get .

We have various Calender Systems....Most of the countries in the world uses Gregorian calendar ....but still there are some countries where Buddhist_calendar is used ( Example Thailand).

Now , when we say 1421 AD ..I believe this does not come under the above two Calender ...right ? So, we have to convert it to our familiar Calender ....right ?

If that is so, whats 1421 AD in Gregorian calendar ?

No, 1241 A.D. already denotes that it refers to the year 1241 in the Gregorian calendar.

Thanks for the information ... that was a hell lot of nice stuffs !

but still, I am not clear with this AD & BC stuff.

do you means AD 's are counted after the birth of Christ ? So, if I say 5 AD ...does that mean the concerned year we are talking is 5 year after the birth of Christ ? Am i correct now ?

Yes, that is correct. It is the way it works.

Thanks for the information ... that was a hell lot of nice stuffs !

but still, I am not clear with this AD & BC stuff.

do you means AD 's are counted after the birth of Christ ? So, if I say 5 AD ...does that mean the concerned year we are talking is 5 year after the birth of Christ ? Am i correct now ?

Well, it just denotes 5 years from an epoch that was decided to be the birth of "christ"

An Epoch is just a common point in time, if we define January 1st, 2000 to be an epoch then we could say it's 9 years "AY2K" (After Year 2000)

Ok ...Thats good info .

>>>1241 A.D. already denotes that it refers to the year 1241 in the Gregorian calendar.

So, you mean AD/BC's are refers to the year in the Gregorian calendar.....ok....fine...cool.

If that is also true , then we can write current year 2009 as 2009 A.D ...right ? Can we write this ? any problem ?

Ok ...Thats good info .

>>>1241 A.D. already denotes that it refers to the year 1241 in the Gregorian calendar.

So, you mean AD/BC's are refers to the year in the Gregorian calendar.....ok....fine...cool.

If that is also true , then we can write current year 2009 as 2009 A.D ...right ? Can we write this ? any problem ?

Yes, you can write 2009 A.D., instead of just 2009. :laugh:

A.D. and B.C. are just designations.

Yes, you can write 2009 A.D., instead of just 2009. :laugh:

A.D. and B.C. are just designations.

ahhh....You made me so happy :)

just one more doubt here.

Suppose, If I say the story is of the time of 10 BC ...that means we are talking about a story of approximately (2009 + 10 )= 2019 years ago . // I did addition because BC = before the birth of Christ ...hence more older

Am I correct in this math ?

Yes, some of the confusion in this thread is coming from the fact the some do not like to use Christian references. Hence we're seeing terms like Common Era (CE) instead of Anno Domini (AD) and Before Common Era (BCE) instead of Before Christ (BC).

In a multicultural modern world it is a bit insensitive (not to mention stylistically dated) to use BC/AD. You'll find that most encyclopedias and other scholarly work has switched to using BCE/CE.

ahhh....You made me so happy :)

just one more doubt here.

Suppose, If I say the story is of the time of 10 BC ...that means we are talking about a story of approximately (2009 + 10 )= 2019 years ago . // I did addition because BC = before the birth of Christ ...hence more older

Am I correct in this math ?

Can't see any flaw with it.

You don't really need to use the suffix unless you're referring to a date B.C (or BCE, whatever), nobody's going to think World War 2 started in 1939 BC (for example)

Yes, some of the confusion in this thread is coming from the fact the some do not like to use Christian references. Hence we're seeing terms like Common Era (CE) instead of Anno Domini (AD) and Before Common Era (BCE) instead of Before Christ (BC).

In a multicultural modern world it is a bit insensitive (not to mention stylistically dated) to use BC/AD. You'll find that most encyclopedias and other scholarly work has switched to using BCE/CE.

I don't see a confusion in the thread deriving from the reason that you have stated.

ahhh....You made me so happy :)

just one more doubt here.

Suppose, If I say the story is of the time of 10 BC ...that means we are talking about a story of approximately (2009 + 10 )= 2019 years ago . // I did addition because BC = before the birth of Christ ...hence more older

Am I correct in this math ?

You are correct.

So, what year did Jesus die?

He supposedly died when he was 33.

If you assume that he was born on year 1 then that would mean the year 34. However, most experts dispute the date of Jesus' birth. It would seem that Jesus was most likely born in 4BC or slightly before. Anything from the year 27 to the year 39 is possible.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary in AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update but that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
    • ALL versions or ALL SUPPORTED versions? Neowin does it again.
    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!