what does AD means ?


Recommended Posts

Anybody understand calender thingies better ?

What does AD means ?

I guess ..AD = After Death of Christ.

The reason I am asking , I found a text written as..In the Buddhist year of 1974 ( 1421 AD )....

Does 1974 = 1421 AD ...really ? whats the math here ?

A.D. means Anno Domini.

"Refers to the traditionally reckoned year of the conception or birth of Jesus, with AD denoting years after the start of this epoch, and BC denoting years before the start of this epoch. There is no year zero in this scheme, so the year AD 1 immediately follows the year 1 BC." - Wikipedia

So, the Buddhist year of 1974 would be 1421 C.E. (Common Era, or A.D.: Anno Domini), and the 'math' that you are looking for is:

2009-1421 = 588 years.

Therefore, whatever you are reading occurred 588 years before 2009, our current year.

As pointed out by The_Decryptor, not everybody in the world uses the calendar that we are familiar with.

Its still pretty confusing thing.

Ok, let me say what i get .

We have various Calender Systems....Most of the countries in the world uses Gregorian calendar ....but still there are some countries where Buddhist_calendar is used ( Example Thailand).

Now , when we say 1421 AD ..I believe this does not come under the above two Calender ...right ? So, we have to convert it to our familiar Calender ....right ?

If that is so, whats 1421 AD in Gregorian calendar ?

A.D. means Anno Domini.

"Refers to the traditionally reckoned year of the conception or birth of Jesus, with AD denoting years after the start of this epoch, and BC denoting years before the start of this epoch. There is no year zero in this scheme, so the year AD 1 immediately follows the year 1 BC." - Wikipedia

So, the Buddhist year of 1974 would be 1421 C.E. (Common Era, or A.D., Anno Domini), and the 'math' that you are looking for is:

2009-1421 = 588 years.

Therefore, whatever you are reading occurred 588 years before 2009, our current year.

As pointed out by The_Decryptor, not everybody in the world uses the calendar that we are familiar with.

Thanks for the information ... that was a hell lot of nice stuffs !

but still, I am not clear with this AD & BC stuff.

do you means AD 's are counted after the birth of Christ ? So, if I say 5 AD ...does that mean the concerned year we are talking is 5 year after the birth of Christ ? Am i correct now ?

Its still pretty confusing thing.

Ok, let me say what i get .

We have various Calender Systems....Most of the countries in the world uses Gregorian calendar ....but still there are some countries where Buddhist_calendar is used ( Example Thailand).

Now , when we say 1421 AD ..I believe this does not come under the above two Calender ...right ? So, we have to convert it to our familiar Calender ....right ?

If that is so, whats 1421 AD in Gregorian calendar ?

No, 1241 A.D. already denotes that it refers to the year 1241 in the Gregorian calendar.

Thanks for the information ... that was a hell lot of nice stuffs !

but still, I am not clear with this AD & BC stuff.

do you means AD 's are counted after the birth of Christ ? So, if I say 5 AD ...does that mean the concerned year we are talking is 5 year after the birth of Christ ? Am i correct now ?

Yes, that is correct. It is the way it works.

Thanks for the information ... that was a hell lot of nice stuffs !

but still, I am not clear with this AD & BC stuff.

do you means AD 's are counted after the birth of Christ ? So, if I say 5 AD ...does that mean the concerned year we are talking is 5 year after the birth of Christ ? Am i correct now ?

Well, it just denotes 5 years from an epoch that was decided to be the birth of "christ"

An Epoch is just a common point in time, if we define January 1st, 2000 to be an epoch then we could say it's 9 years "AY2K" (After Year 2000)

Ok ...Thats good info .

>>>1241 A.D. already denotes that it refers to the year 1241 in the Gregorian calendar.

So, you mean AD/BC's are refers to the year in the Gregorian calendar.....ok....fine...cool.

If that is also true , then we can write current year 2009 as 2009 A.D ...right ? Can we write this ? any problem ?

Ok ...Thats good info .

>>>1241 A.D. already denotes that it refers to the year 1241 in the Gregorian calendar.

So, you mean AD/BC's are refers to the year in the Gregorian calendar.....ok....fine...cool.

If that is also true , then we can write current year 2009 as 2009 A.D ...right ? Can we write this ? any problem ?

Yes, you can write 2009 A.D., instead of just 2009. :laugh:

A.D. and B.C. are just designations.

Yes, you can write 2009 A.D., instead of just 2009. :laugh:

A.D. and B.C. are just designations.

ahhh....You made me so happy :)

just one more doubt here.

Suppose, If I say the story is of the time of 10 BC ...that means we are talking about a story of approximately (2009 + 10 )= 2019 years ago . // I did addition because BC = before the birth of Christ ...hence more older

Am I correct in this math ?

Yes, some of the confusion in this thread is coming from the fact the some do not like to use Christian references. Hence we're seeing terms like Common Era (CE) instead of Anno Domini (AD) and Before Common Era (BCE) instead of Before Christ (BC).

In a multicultural modern world it is a bit insensitive (not to mention stylistically dated) to use BC/AD. You'll find that most encyclopedias and other scholarly work has switched to using BCE/CE.

ahhh....You made me so happy :)

just one more doubt here.

Suppose, If I say the story is of the time of 10 BC ...that means we are talking about a story of approximately (2009 + 10 )= 2019 years ago . // I did addition because BC = before the birth of Christ ...hence more older

Am I correct in this math ?

Can't see any flaw with it.

You don't really need to use the suffix unless you're referring to a date B.C (or BCE, whatever), nobody's going to think World War 2 started in 1939 BC (for example)

Yes, some of the confusion in this thread is coming from the fact the some do not like to use Christian references. Hence we're seeing terms like Common Era (CE) instead of Anno Domini (AD) and Before Common Era (BCE) instead of Before Christ (BC).

In a multicultural modern world it is a bit insensitive (not to mention stylistically dated) to use BC/AD. You'll find that most encyclopedias and other scholarly work has switched to using BCE/CE.

I don't see a confusion in the thread deriving from the reason that you have stated.

ahhh....You made me so happy :)

just one more doubt here.

Suppose, If I say the story is of the time of 10 BC ...that means we are talking about a story of approximately (2009 + 10 )= 2019 years ago . // I did addition because BC = before the birth of Christ ...hence more older

Am I correct in this math ?

You are correct.

So, what year did Jesus die?

He supposedly died when he was 33.

If you assume that he was born on year 1 then that would mean the year 34. However, most experts dispute the date of Jesus' birth. It would seem that Jesus was most likely born in 4BC or slightly before. Anything from the year 27 to the year 39 is possible.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • As I've been usually saying lately - we all can thank "AI" for this.
    • Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. My Windows11 device on the Preview Channel just got 26220.8728. My guess is this build is a nightly update from 26220.8690.
    • Traffic has a surprisingly unexpected impact on your surroundings by Sayan Sen Image by Radik 2707 via Pexels A collaborative study by researchers from several Israeli institutions found that everyday pollution from traffic and industrial activity measurably changed the atmospheric electric field over the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, providing new evidence of how human activity can influence the lower atmosphere. The research was led by Dr. Roy Yaniv of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Gertner Institute at Sheba Medical Center, Dr. Assaf Hochman of the Fredy & Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences at the Hebrew University, and Prof. Yoav Yair of Reichman University. The study also involved Itay Froomer, a student from Hadera High School and the Israeli Museum of Medicine and Science (Technoda), who carried out the work as part of the Ministry of Education's 5-unit physics research track. The researchers focused on the atmospheric electric field under fair-weather conditions. Even in the absence of storms, a weak electric field naturally exists between Earth's surface and the atmosphere. One of the main ways scientists measure this field is through the Potential Gradient (PG), which is the inverse of the vertical component of the electric field. PG is a key part of the global electric circuit, a planet-wide system of electrical currents maintained by thunderstorms and electrified clouds around the world. Scientists have long known that the atmospheric electric field can be influenced by factors ranging from large-scale atmospheric processes to local weather conditions such as dust, fog and clouds. Human-made pollution is also known to play a role, but understanding exactly how urban emissions affect the electric field close to the ground has remained an area of ongoing research. To investigate this relationship, the team analyzed measurements from a newly installed electric field mill, an instrument used to continuously monitor the strength of the atmospheric electric field. The instrument was installed at the Center for Technological Education (Roter House) in Holon and became operational in August 2024. It was funded by Israel's Ministry of Education and the Holon municipality. The electric field mill forms part of a broader monitoring network that includes nearby meteorological stations and air-quality monitoring sites. This allowed researchers to compare electric field measurements with detailed weather data and pollution records to better understand what was driving changes in the Potential Gradient. The study focused on two major urban pollutants: fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), both commonly produced by vehicle traffic and industrial activity. PM2.5 refers to microscopic airborne particles small enough to remain suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods, while NOx is a group of gases released during fuel combustion. Researchers examined daily, weekly and seasonal patterns in the atmospheric electric field and compared them with changes in pollutant concentrations. Their analysis revealed a clear relationship between NOx levels and changes in the Potential Gradient, particularly during morning and evening rush hours when traffic emissions were at their highest. “What we observe is a direct physical link between emission peaks and electrical variability,” explained Dr. Roy Yaniv. “NOx reduces atmospheric conductivity very quickly, so the electric field responds almost instantaneously during traffic rush hours.” Atmospheric conductivity describes how easily electrical charges move through the air. According to the researchers, nitrogen oxides rapidly alter this conductivity, causing a near-immediate response in the electric field. PM2.5, however, was associated with a delayed response. The researchers attributed this difference to the particles' longer atmospheric residence time, meaning they remain in the atmosphere for longer periods, as well as their different microphysical interactions with surrounding air and atmospheric components. The study also identified a pronounced "weekend effect." In Israel, traffic volumes and some industrial activity decline significantly on Fridays and Saturdays. During these periods, concentrations of both NOx and PM2.5 dropped, and corresponding changes were observed in the atmospheric electric field. “The weekend signal demonstrates just how sensitive the electric field is to changes in human activity,” the researchers noted. “When emissions decline, the electrical environment adjusts at once, providing a high-resolution indicator of urban atmospheric conditions.” The findings showed that pollution levels can influence not only the chemical composition of the atmosphere but also its electrical properties. Researchers said the results strengthened the case for using atmospheric electricity as an additional tool for environmental monitoring, particularly in densely populated urban areas where anthropogenic, or human-caused, influences are most pronounced. The study also pointed to potential public health applications. By combining air-quality measurements with observations of atmospheric electricity, researchers said they could gain a more complete picture of how urban atmospheric conditions change over time. “Integrating air-quality data with electric-field measurements gives us a clearer picture of how the lower atmosphere evolves moment by moment,” the researchers added. “It’s a framework that can support both scientific insight and practical environmental decision-making.” Beyond the scientific findings, the project highlighted a collaboration between universities, public institutions and secondary education. Researchers said the work demonstrated how students could take part in real-world environmental research while contributing to studies of air quality, atmospheric processes and their potential effects on society. Source: Hebrew University, ScienceDirect This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • We aren't even at the all-star game and Microsoft is talking about an update that will most likely be released during the World Series if not after. A lot can happen in the world between now and the 2026 World Series, including the 2026 FIFA Cup. Tell me about it again after the FIFA Cup is concluded. That should allow plenty of time to prepare for it.
    • Great, tell me when I have a "Bad Pool Caller" elsewhere not in Windoze.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!